Literature DB >> 26315879

Long-term outcome of endoscopic and surgical resection for foregut neuroendocrine tumors.

Hee Jae Jung1, Su Jin Hong1, Jae Pil Han1, Hyun Su Kim1, Gui-Ae Jeong2, Gyu-Seok Cho2, Hee Kyoung Kim3, Bong Min Ko1, Moon Sung Lee1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic resection (ER) of foregut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is increasingly performed instead of surgery. This study aimed to compare the long-term therapeutic outcomes of ER and surgical resection (SR) for foregut NETs.
METHODS: From 2002 to 2012, a total of 49 patients with histologically confirmed foregut NETs were treated by ER (n = 33) and SR (n = 16). The clinicopathological characteristics and therapeutic outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the 33 patients who underwent ER [endoscopic mucosal resection (n = 26), endoscopic mucosal dissection (n = 7)], 32 were diagnosed as NET-G1 and NET-G2, and the other as neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Of the 16 patients who underwent SR, 10 were diagnosed as NET-G1, 2 as NET-G2 and 4 as NEC. The median tumor size was significantly smaller in the ER group compared with the SR group (7 mm vs 19 mm, P = 0.001). In almost all patients treated with ER (32/33), NET invasion was limited to the mucosa and submucosa. Non-curative resections were observed in 24.2% of the patients in the ER group (8/33) and 25.0% in the SR group (4/16). No recurrence occurred in NET cases with positive resection margins by ER. However, all cases of non-curative resection with lymphatic invasion (one in the ER group and four in the SR group) developed liver metastasis during the follow-up despite complete resection, and all these five patients has histologically confirmed NECs.
CONCLUSION: NET patients treated by ER may have a good prognosis if the tumor size is small and histologically low grade without lymphatic invasion.
© 2015 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic resection; foregut; long-term outcome; neoplasm metastasis; neuroendocrine tumors; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26315879     DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dig Dis        ISSN: 1751-2972            Impact factor:   2.325


  5 in total

1.  Survival effects of primary and metastatic surgical treatment in metastatic small intestinal tumors: A propensity score-matching study.

Authors:  Zhongyi Zhou; Heming Ge; Yuqiang Li; Dan Wang; Cenap Güngör
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: A retrospective, single-center study.

Authors:  Sang Gyu Park; Bong Eun Lee; Gwang Ha Kim; Joon Woo Park; Moon Won Lee; Su Jin Kim; Cheol Woong Choi; Sojeong Lee; Do Youn Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Risk factors for metastasis and survival of patients with T1 gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma treated with endoscopic therapy versus surgical resection.

Authors:  Hua Ye; Yuan Yuan; Ping Chen; Qi Zheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Surgical treatment and prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Chaoyong Shen; Huijiao Chen; Haining Chen; Yuan Yin; Luyin Han; Jiaju Chen; Sumin Tang; Xiaonan Yin; Zongguang Zhou; Bo Zhang; Zhixin Chen
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Development of predictive prognostic nomogram for NECs of rectum on population-based exploration.

Authors:  Yang Lv; Ning Pu; Weilin Mao; Wenqi Chen; Huanyu Wang; Xu Han; Yuan Ji; Lei Zhang; Dayong Jin; Wenhui Lou; Xuefeng Xu
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.335

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.