Literature DB >> 26315733

Comparative Analysis of Sequential Proximal Optimizing Technique Versus Kissing Balloon Inflation Technique in Provisional Bifurcation Stenting: Fractal Coronary Bifurcation Bench Test.

Gérard Finet1, François Derimay2, Pascal Motreff3, Patrice Guerin4, Paul Pilet4, Jacques Ohayon5, Olivier Darremont6, Gilles Rioufol2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study used a fractal bifurcation bench model to compare 6 optimization sequences for coronary bifurcation provisional stenting, including 1 novel sequence without kissing balloon inflation (KBI), comprising initial proximal optimizing technique (POT) + side-branch inflation (SBI) + final POT, called "re-POT."
BACKGROUND: In provisional bifurcation stenting, KBI fails to improve the rate of major adverse cardiac events. Proximal geometric deformation increases the rate of in-stent restenosis and target lesion revascularization.
METHODS: A bifurcation bench model was used to compare KBI alone, KBI after POT, KBI with asymmetric inflation pressure after POT, and 2 sequences without KBI: initial POT plus SBI, and initial POT plus SBI with final POT (called "re-POT"). For each protocol, 5 stents were tested using 2 different drug-eluting stent designs: that is, a total of 60 tests.
RESULTS: Compared with the classic KBI-only sequence and those associating POT with modified KBI, the re-POT sequence gave significantly (p < 0.05) better geometric results: it reduced SB ostium stent-strut obstruction from 23.2 ± 6.0% to 5.6 ± 8.3%, provided perfect proximal stent apposition with almost perfect circularity (ellipticity index reduced from 1.23 ± 0.02 to 1.04 ± 0.01), reduced proximal area overstretch from 24.2 ± 7.6% to 8.0 ± 0.4%, and reduced global strut malapposition from 40 ± 6.2% to 2.6 ± 1.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with 5 other techniques, the re-POT sequence significantly optimized the final result of provisional coronary bifurcation stenting, maintaining circular geometry while significantly reducing SB ostium strut obstruction and global strut malapposition. These experimental findings confirm that provisional stenting may be optimized more effectively without KBI using re-POT.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bifurcation bench model; coronary bifurcation; kissing balloon inflation; stent design

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26315733     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  20 in total

1.  Coronary bifurcation lesions: is less more?

Authors:  Johan Bennett; Christophe Dubois
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The Proximal Optimisation Technique for Intervention of Coronary Bifurcations.

Authors:  Angela Hoye
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

3.  Practice Patterns in the Interventional Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Global Survey.

Authors:  Ilias Nikolakopoulos; Evangelia Vemmou; Judit Karacsonyi; Lorenzo Azzalini; Brian A Bergmark; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Allison B Hall; Jason Wollmuth; Kevin Croce; Hani Jneid; Bavana V Rangan; M Nicholas Burke; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.022

4.  Procedural findings and early healing response after implantation of a self-apposing bioresorbable scaffold in coronary bifurcation lesions.

Authors:  Emil Nielsen Holck; Camilla Fox-Maule; Trine Ørhøj Barkholt; Lars Jakobsen; Shengxian Tu; Michael Maeng; Jouke Dijkstra; Evald Høj Christiansen; Niels Ramsing Holm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions).

Authors:  Shao-Liang Chen; Teguh Santoso; Jun-Jie Zhang; Fei Ye; Ya-Wei Xu; Qiang Fu; Jing Kan; Feng-Fu Zhang; Yong Zhou; Du-Jiang Xie; Tak W Kwan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.546

6.  Visualizing polymeric bioresorbable scaffolds with three-dimensional image reconstruction using contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Sheng Tu; Fudong Hu; Wei Cai; Liyan Xiao; Linlin Zhang; Hong Zheng; Qiong Jiang; Lianglong Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Understanding the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.

Authors:  Hyeon Cheol Gwon
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Comparative Computed Flow Dynamic Analysis of Different Optimization Techniques in Left Main Either Provisional or Culotte Stenting.

Authors:  Gianluca Rigatelli; Fabio Dell'Avvocata; Marco Zuin; Sara Giatti; Khanh Duong; Trung Pham; Nguyen Si Tuan; Dobrin Vassiliev; Ramesh Daggubati; Thach Nguyen
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2017-12-29

9.  12-month intravascular ultrasound observations from BiOSS® first-in-man studies.

Authors:  Robert J Gil; Jacek Bil; Ricardo A Costa; Katarzyna E Gil; Dobrin Vassiliev
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Critical aspects of balloon position during final proximal optimization technique (POT) in coronary bifurcation stenting.

Authors:  Lene N Andreasen; Niels R Holm; Bruce Webber; John A Ormiston
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.