Literature DB >> 26315506

A quantitative method for evaluating numerical simulation accuracy of time-transient Lamb wave propagation with its applications to selecting appropriate element size and time step.

Xiang Wan1, Guanghua Xu2, Qing Zhang3, Peter W Tse4, Haihui Tan5.   

Abstract

Lamb wave technique has been widely used in non-destructive evaluation (NDE) and structural health monitoring (SHM). However, due to the multi-mode characteristics and dispersive nature, Lamb wave propagation behavior is much more complex than that of bulk waves. Numerous numerical simulations on Lamb wave propagation have been conducted to study its physical principles. However, few quantitative studies on evaluating the accuracy of these numerical simulations were reported. In this paper, a method based on cross correlation analysis for quantitatively evaluating the simulation accuracy of time-transient Lamb waves propagation is proposed. Two kinds of error, affecting the position and shape accuracies are firstly identified. Consequently, two quantitative indices, i.e., the GVE (group velocity error) and MACCC (maximum absolute value of cross correlation coefficient) derived from cross correlation analysis between a simulated signal and a reference waveform, are proposed to assess the position and shape errors of the simulated signal. In this way, the simulation accuracy on the position and shape is quantitatively evaluated. In order to apply this proposed method to select appropriate element size and time step, a specialized 2D-FEM program combined with the proposed method is developed. Then, the proper element size considering different element types and time step considering different time integration schemes are selected. These results proved that the proposed method is feasible and effective, and can be used as an efficient tool for quantitatively evaluating and verifying the simulation accuracy of time-transient Lamb wave propagation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cross correlation analysis; GVE (group velocity error); MACCC (maximum absolute value of cross correlation coefficient); Quantitative method; Simulation accuracy evaluation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26315506     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  3 in total

1.  Sparse and Dispersion-Based Matching Pursuit for Minimizing the Dispersion Effect Occurring when Using Guided Wave for Pipe Inspection.

Authors:  Javad Rostami; Peter W T Tse; Zhou Fang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  A Signal Processing Approach with a Smooth Empirical Mode Decomposition to Reveal Hidden Trace of Corrosion in Highly Contaminated Guided Wave Signals for Concrete-Covered Pipes.

Authors:  Javad Rostami; Jingming Chen; Peter W Tse
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Numerical Study on Ultrasonic Guided Waves for the Inspection of Polygonal Drill Pipes.

Authors:  Xiang Wan; Xuhui Zhang; Hongwei Fan; Peter W Tse; Ming Dong; Hongwei Ma
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.