Literature DB >> 26314876

Prognostic Performance of Current Stage III Oral Cancer Patients After Curative Intent Resection: Evidence to Support a Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System.

M Amit1,2, T C Yen3, C T Liao3, P Chaturvedi4, J P Agarwal4, L P Kowalski5, Hugo F Kohler5, A Ebrahimi6,7, J R Clark6, C R Cernea8, S J Brandao8, M Kreppel9, J Zöller9, M D Fliss10, G Bachar11, T Shpitzer11, V A Bolzoni12, P R Patel13, S Jonnalagadda14, K T Robbins14, N G Iyer15, T Skanthakumar15, J P Shah16, S G Patel16, Z Gil17,18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III classification of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) represents a heterogeneous group of patients with early local disease with regional metastases (T1N1 and T2N1) and advanced local disease with or without regional metastasis (T3N0 and T3N1).
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic heterogeneity in the stage III category. METHODS AND PATIENTS: An international retrospective multicenter study of 1815 patients who were treated for OCSCC from 2003 to 2011.
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate models of stage III patients revealed better overall survival (OS; HR 2.12, 95 % CI 1.03-4.15; p = 0.01) and disease-specific survival (DSS; HR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.16-4.12; p = 0.04) rates for patients with T1-2N1/T3N0 disease than for patients with T3N1 disease. The outcomes of patients with T3N1 and stage IVa disease were similar (p = 0.89 and p = 0.78 for OS and DSS, respectively). Modifying stage classification by transferring the T3N1 category to the stage VIa group resulted in a better prognostic performance [Harrell's concordance index, C index 0.76; Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) 4131.6] compared with the AJCC 7th edition staging system (C index 0.65; AIC 4144.9) for OS. When DSS was assessed, the suggested staging system remained the best performing model (C index 0.71; AIC 1061.3) compared with the current AJCC 7th edition staging (C index 0.64; AIC 1066.2).
CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of T3N1 and stage IVa disease are similar in OCSCC, suggesting that these categories could be combined in future revisions of the nodal staging system to enhance prognostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26314876      PMCID: PMC4941785          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4842-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of published head and neck stage groupings in carcinomas of the oral cavity.

Authors:  P A Groome; K Schulze; M Boysen; S F Hall; W J Mackillop
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 2.  Consensus statement on the classification and terminology of neck dissection.

Authors:  K Thomas Robbins; Ashok R Shaha; Jesus E Medina; Joseph A Califano; Gregory T Wolf; Alfio Ferlito; Peter M Som; Terry A Day
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-05

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Detection of cervical metastasis. A meta-analysis comparing computed tomography with physical examination.

Authors:  R M Merritt; M F Williams; T H James; E S Porubsky
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-02

5.  Identification of a high-risk subgroup of patients with resected pT3 oral cavity cancer in need of postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Chun-Ta Liao; Chien-Yu Lin; Kang-Hsing Fan; Shiang-Fu Huang; I-How Chen; Chung-Jan Kang; Hung-Ming Wang; Shu-Hang Ng; Chuen Hsueh; Li-Yu Lee; Chih-Hung Lin; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501).

Authors:  Jacques Bernier; Jay S Cooper; T F Pajak; M van Glabbeke; J Bourhis; Arlene Forastiere; Esat Mahmut Ozsahin; John R Jacobs; J Jassem; Kie-Kian Ang; J L Lefèbvre
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Postoperative radiotherapy in patients with positive nodes after functional neck dissection.

Authors:  J Gavilán; M P Prim; J I De Diego; D Hardisson; A Pozuelo
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 8.  Current concepts in management of oral cancer--surgery.

Authors:  Jatin P Shah; Ziv Gil
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 9.  Challenges for the future modifications of the TNM staging system for head and neck cancer: case for a new computational model?

Authors:  Kapila Manikantan; Suhail I Sayed; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Peter Rhys-Evans; Chris M Nutting; Kevin J Harrington; Rehan Kazi
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  Does pathologic node status affect local control in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy?

Authors:  M S Rudoltz; A Benammar; M Mohiuddin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Human Papillomavirus Infections are Common and Predict Mortality in a Retrospective Cohort Study of Taiwanese Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer.

Authors:  Li-Ang Lee; Chung-Guei Huang; Kuo-Chien Tsao; Chun-Ta Liao; Chung-Jan Kang; Kai-Ping Chang; Shiang-Fu Huang; I-How Chen; Tuan-Jen Fang; Hsueh-Yu Li; Shu-Li Yang; Li-Yu Lee; Chuen Hsueh; Chien-Yu Lin; Kang-Hsing Fan; Tung-Chieh Chang; Hung-Ming Wang; Shu-Hang Ng; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.