Shannon M O'Connor1, Kelly L Klump1, Jessica L VanHuysse2, Matt McGue3, William Iacono3. 1. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. 2. Department of Behavioral Medicine, Genesys Regional Medical Center, Consortium for Advanced Psychology Training, Michigan State University Flint Area Medical Education, Flint, Michigan. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous research suggests that parental divorce moderates genetic influences on body dissatisfaction. Specifically, the heritability of body dissatisfaction is higher in children of divorced versus intact families, suggesting possible gene-environment interaction effects. However, prior research is limited to a single, self-reported measure of body dissatisfaction. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether these findings extend to a different dimension of body dissatisfaction: body image perceptions. METHOD: Participants were 1,534 female twins from the Minnesota Twin Family Study, aged 16-20 years. The Body Rating Scale (BRS) was used to assess body image perceptions. RESULTS: Although BRS scores were heritable in twins from divorced and intact families, the heritability estimates in the divorced group were not significantly greater than estimates in the intact group. However, there were differences in nonshared environmental effects, where the magnitude of these environmental influences was larger in the divorced as compared with the intact families. DISCUSSION: Different dimensions of body dissatisfaction (i.e., negative self-evaluation versus body image perceptions) may interact with environmental risk, such as parental divorce, in discrete ways. Future research should examine this possibility and explore differential gene-environment interactions using diverse measures.
OBJECTIVE: Previous research suggests that parental divorce moderates genetic influences on body dissatisfaction. Specifically, the heritability of body dissatisfaction is higher in children of divorced versus intact families, suggesting possible gene-environment interaction effects. However, prior research is limited to a single, self-reported measure of body dissatisfaction. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether these findings extend to a different dimension of body dissatisfaction: body image perceptions. METHOD:Participants were 1,534 female twins from the Minnesota Twin Family Study, aged 16-20 years. The Body Rating Scale (BRS) was used to assess body image perceptions. RESULTS: Although BRS scores were heritable in twins from divorced and intact families, the heritability estimates in the divorced group were not significantly greater than estimates in the intact group. However, there were differences in nonshared environmental effects, where the magnitude of these environmental influences was larger in the divorced as compared with the intact families. DISCUSSION: Different dimensions of body dissatisfaction (i.e., negative self-evaluation versus body image perceptions) may interact with environmental risk, such as parental divorce, in discrete ways. Future research should examine this possibility and explore differential gene-environment interactions using diverse measures.
Authors: Jessica L Suisman; S Alexandra Burt; Matt McGue; William G Iacono; Kelly L Klump Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Joshua I Hrabosky; Thomas F Cash; David Veale; Fugen Neziroglu; Elizabeth A Soll; David M Garner; Melissa Strachan-Kinser; Bette Bakke; Laura J Clauss; Katharine A Phillips Journal: Body Image Date: 2009-05-01