Literature DB >> 26313895

Initial Experience of a Patient Navigation Model for Head and Neck Cancer.

Jason F Ohlstein1, Sabrina Brody-Camp1, Starr Friedman1, Joshua M Levy1, Joseph F Buell2, Paul Friedlander1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Specific temporal goals for treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) are common in Europe but not in the United States. We implemented a patient-centric navigation model with an aspirational goal that all patients will receive treatment recommendations within 2 weeks of presentation as a means to improve outcomes in our patients with HNC.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the temporal impact of using an aspirational goal in a patient-centric navigation system on the time from presentation to formulation of treatment planning for patients with HNC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck at a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2014. Patients were assessed to determine the efficiency of a patient-centric navigational model in delivering cancer treatment recommendations. This model was designed with an aspirational goal of providing treatment recommendations within a 2-week period. EXPOSURE: Starting in 2011, patient-centric navigation model including the assignment of a nurse who acts as a patient navigator. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The time interval between presentation to clinic and definitive treatment recommendations, as well as factors associated with delay.
RESULTS: Of the 93 patients who met inclusion requirements, most were white (81 [87%]) males (74 [80%]) with a mean (SD) age of 63.4 (10.8) years insured by Medicare or Medicaid (64 [69%]). Forty-seven (51%) received treatment recommendations within the 2-week period, with median and mode values of 15 and 14 days, respectively. The mean (SD) interval was 18.8 (18.6) days. Outliers included 2 patients with synchronous lung nodules (72 and 85 days) and 2 patients with psychosocial barriers (107 and 86 days). There were no significant differences seen for the mean (SD) time interval with respect to patient race (blacks, 17.6 [15.7] vs whites, 22.5 [30.0]; P = .20), sex (males, 18.3 [18.1] vs females, 20.4 [19.7]; P = .13), insurance status (insured, 16.3 [10.2] vs uninsured, 19.8 [21.0]; P = .24), and stage at presentation (stage I, 14.4 [17.0] vs stage II, 11.0 [5.3] vs stage III, 14.7 [8.6] vs stage IV, 21.2 [20.2]; P = .40). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The goal of treatment recommendations for HNC within 2 weeks was shown to be reasonable and attainable. Further research should address the delays encountered by patients with psychosocial barriers and those with synchronous lung nodules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26313895     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.1467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  2 in total

1.  Influence of time interval from diagnosis to treatment on survival for oral cavity cancer: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Wen-Chen Tsai; Pei-Tseng Kung; Yueh-Hsin Wang; Kuang-Hua Huang; Shih-An Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Factors Influencing the Implementation of Patient Navigation Programs for Adults with Complex Needs: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kristina M Kokorelias; Jessica E Shiers-Hanley; Jorge Rios; Amanda Knoepfli; Sander L Hitzig
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2021-07-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.