J Röther1, M Tröbs2, J Ludwig2, S Achenbach2, C Schlundt2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine 2, University of Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: jens.roether@uk-erlangen.de. 2. Department of Internal Medicine 2, University of Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the success rate and outcome of coronary artery perforation treatment using a dual guiding catheter technique. BACKGROUND: Coronary artery perforation is a rare but severe complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with high mortality. The use of a second guiding catheter is a helpful technique to minimize hemorrhage through the perforation during interventional repair. METHODS: We screened all patients between March 2004 and December 2014 who underwent PCI in our department for the occurrence of peri-interventional coronary perforation that was treated using a dual catheter technique. Patient and lesion characteristics as well as outcome were determined. RESULTS: We identified 8 patients who experienced coronary artery perforations (Ellis grade III) during coronary intervention and were treated using a dual guiding catheter approach. The procedure was technically successful (placement of covered stent and sealing of perforation) in 6 patients. Pericardiocentesis was required in 3 patients (38%). Total mortality was 12% (n=1). No coronary or peripheral vascular access complication occurred due to the use of a second guiding catheter. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the dual guiding catheter technique is a useful and alternative approach to treat severe Ellis grade III coronary artery perforations that occur in the context of percutaneous coronary interventions.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the success rate and outcome of coronary artery perforation treatment using a dual guiding catheter technique. BACKGROUND: Coronary artery perforation is a rare but severe complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with high mortality. The use of a second guiding catheter is a helpful technique to minimize hemorrhage through the perforation during interventional repair. METHODS: We screened all patients between March 2004 and December 2014 who underwent PCI in our department for the occurrence of peri-interventional coronary perforation that was treated using a dual catheter technique. Patient and lesion characteristics as well as outcome were determined. RESULTS: We identified 8 patients who experienced coronary artery perforations (Ellis grade III) during coronary intervention and were treated using a dual guiding catheter approach. The procedure was technically successful (placement of covered stent and sealing of perforation) in 6 patients. Pericardiocentesis was required in 3 patients (38%). Total mortality was 12% (n=1). No coronary or peripheral vascular access complication occurred due to the use of a second guiding catheter. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the dual guiding catheter technique is a useful and alternative approach to treat severe Ellis grade III coronary artery perforations that occur in the context of percutaneous coronary interventions.