| Literature DB >> 26313665 |
K Oguejiofor1,2, J Hall3, C Slater4, G Betts5, G Hall5, N Slevin2, S Dovedi6, P L Stern7, C M L West1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) have a better prognosis than those with HPV-negative tumours. There is interest in de-escalating their treatment but strategies are needed for risk stratification to identify subsets with a poor prognosis. This study investigated tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in relation to HPV tumour status and patient survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26313665 PMCID: PMC4578081 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Illustration of the method for image analysis of the multiplex immunohistochemically stained sections. The steps involved: image acquisition and processing to obtain the actual multiplex stained image (A); composite imaging of stromal (green), tumour (red) and blank (blue) spaces (B); superimposing A and B (C); enumeration of cells using haematoxylin (D); classification of the quantified cells based on the spectral properties and multiplex staining for tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (E); and quantification of the different T-cell populations in the different compartments as CD3+ (red), CD3+CD4+ (yellow), CD4+ (green) or negative for both markers (blue, F).
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier plots. Overall survival (A) and locoregional control (B) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer stratified by HPV status (74 HPV positive and 65 HPV negative).
The mean cell density of different T-cell populations per region of interest
| HPV positive∼ | 7.9 × 103 | 3.5 × 103 | 4.2 × 103 |
| HPV negative | 3.2 × 103 | 1.5 × 103 | 1.6 × 103 |
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.1 | |
| HPV positive | 1.8 × 103 | 0.5 × 103 | 1.3 × 103 |
| HPV negative | 0.4 × 103 | 0.25 × 103 | 0.14 × 103 |
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| HPV positive | 5.1 × 103 | 2.3 × 103 | 2.4 × 103 |
| HPV negative | 1.6 × 103 | 0.8 × 103 | 0.9 × 103 |
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.001 | |
| HPV positive | 0.1 × 103 | 0.006 × 103 | 0.005 × 103 |
| HPV negative | 0.09 × 103 | 0.003 × 103 | 0.004 × 103 |
| 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.09 | |
Abbreviartions: HPV=human papillomavirus; OPSCC=oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; ROI=region of interest.
Mean of 60 ROIs, each 3.5 × 105 nm2 (30 in stroma and 30 in tumour areas), ∼74 HPV-positive and 65 HPV-negative OPSCC.
Figure 3Scatter plots showing the differential infiltration of the T-cell subsets in HPV-positive ( CD3+ (A), CD3+CD8+ (B) and CD3+CD4+ (C) had significantly higher infiltration of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in HPV-positive cancers. There was no difference in CD4+FoxP3+ cells (D).
Figure 4Scatter plots of the differential infiltration of T-cell subsets in the various compartments (tumour and stroma) stratified according to HPV status. CD3+ (A), CD3+CD8+ (B) and CD3+CD4+ (C) T cells showed a consistent significantly higher infiltration in the tumour and stromal compartments of HPV-positive tumours. CD4+FoxP3+ (D) showed no difference in T-cell infiltration in the different compartments according to HPV status.
Figure 5Kaplan–Meier plots of OS of 139 OPSCC in relation to T-cell infiltration and tumour microenvironment compartment. The panels show low vs high CD3+ T-cell infiltration in all 139 (A), 74 HPV-positive (B) and 65 HPV-negative (C) tumours. (D and E) Survival of HPV-positive patients by CD3+ T-cell infiltration in the tumour and stromal compartments, respectively. (F and G) Survival of HPV-positive patients in relation to infiltration of CD3+CD8+ and CD3+CD4+ T cells, respectively, and the significantly better survival seen with higher CD3+CD8 T-cell infiltration (P=0.05). (H and I) Survival of patients with HPV-positive tumours with infiltration of CD3+CD8+ T cells in tumour and stromal compartments, respectively. Stromal infiltration but not tumour infiltration was associated with significantly better survival (P=0.02).