Literature DB >> 26313299

The Reliability and Reproducibility of Corneal Confocal Microscopy in Children.

Danièle Pacaud1, Kenneth G Romanchuk2, Mitra Tavakoli3, Claire Gougeon1, Heidi Virtanen1, Maryam Ferdousi3, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre1, Jean K Mah1, Rayaz A Malik4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the image and patient level interrater agreement and repeatability within 1 month for corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) measured using in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCCM) in children.
METHODS: Seventy-one subjects (mean [SD] age 14.3 [2.6] years, range 8-18 years; 44 with type 1 diabetes and 27 controls; 36 males and 35 females) were included. 547 images (∼6 images per subject) were analyzed manually by two independent and masked observers. One-month repeat visit images were analyzed by a single masked observer in 21 patients. Automated image analysis was then performed using a specialized computerized software (ACCMetrics).
RESULTS: For CNFL, the ICC (95% CI) were 0.94 (0.93-0.95) for image-level, 0.86 (0.78-0.91) for patient-level, and 0.88 (0.72-0.95) for the 1-month repeat assessment, and the Bland-Altman plots showed minimal bias between observers. Although there was excellent agreement between manual and automated analysis according to an ICC 0.89 (0.82-0.93), the Bland-Altman plot showed a consistent bias with manual measurements providing higher readings.
CONCLUSIONS: In vivo corneal confocal microscopy image analysis shows good reproducibility with excellent intraindividual and interindividual variability in pediatric subjects. Since the image-level reproducibility is stronger than the patient-level reproducibility, refinement of the method for image selection will likely further increase the robustness of this novel, rapid, and noninvasive approach to detect early neuropathy in children with diabetes. Further studies on the use of IVCCM to identify early subclinical neuropathy in children are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26313299     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-16995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  9 in total

1.  Rapid Corneal Nerve Fiber Loss: A Marker of Diabetic Neuropathy Onset and Progression.

Authors:  Evan J H Lewis; Leif E Lovblom; Maryam Ferdousi; Elise M Halpern; Maria Jeziorska; Daniele Pacaud; Nicola Pritchard; Cirous Dehghani; Katie Edwards; Sangeetha Srinivasan; Roni Mintz Shtein; Nathan Efron; Mitra Tavakoli; Vera Bril; Rayaz Ahmed Malik; Bruce A Perkins
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Corneal confocal microscopy is a rapid reproducible ophthalmic technique for quantifying corneal nerve abnormalities.

Authors:  Alise Kalteniece; Maryam Ferdousi; Safwaan Adam; Jonathan Schofield; Shazli Azmi; Ioannis Petropoulos; Handrean Soran; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Early corneal nerve fibre damage and increased Langerhans cell density in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Maryam Ferdousi; Kenneth Romanchuk; Jean K Mah; Heidi Virtanen; Christine Millar; Rayaz A Malik; Danièle Pacaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Corneal confocal microscopy compared with quantitative sensory testing and nerve conduction for diagnosing and stratifying the severity of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Maryam Ferdousi; Alise Kalteniece; Shazli Azmi; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Anne Worthington; Luca D'Onofrio; Shaishav Dhage; Georgios Ponirakis; Uazman Alam; Andrew Marshall; Catharina G Faber; Giuseppe Lauria; Handrean Soran; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-12

Review 5.  Corneal Confocal Microscopy as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review.

Authors:  Eleonora Cosmo; Giulia Midena; Luisa Frizziero; Marisa Bruno; Michela Cecere; Edoardo Midena
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreements of the Detection of Demodex Infestation by in Vivo Confocal Microscopy.

Authors:  Ayse Yildiz Tas; Burak Mergen; Erdost Yildiz; Betul N Bayraktutar; Ekrem Celik; Afsun Sahin; Ceyhun Arici
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 7.  A Review of Imaging Biomarkers of the Ocular Surface.

Authors:  William W Binotti; Betul Bayraktutar; M Cuneyt Ozmen; Stephanie M Cox; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.152

8.  Corneal Confocal Microscopy Predicts the Development of Diabetic Neuropathy: A Longitudinal Diagnostic Multinational Consortium Study.

Authors:  Bruce A Perkins; Leif Erik Lovblom; Evan J H Lewis; Vera Bril; Maryam Ferdousi; Andrej Orszag; Katie Edwards; Nicola Pritchard; Anthony Russell; Cirous Dehghani; Danièle Pacaud; Kenneth Romanchuk; Jean K Mah; Maria Jeziorska; Andrew Marshall; Roni M Shtein; Rodica Pop-Busui; Stephen I Lentz; Mitra Tavakoli; Andrew J M Boulton; Nathan Efron; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 17.152

9.  In vivo confocal microscopy study of corneal nerve alterations in children and youths with Type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Tiziano Cozzini; Claudia Piona; Giorgio Marchini; Tommaso Merz; Tommaso Brighenti; Jacopo Bonetto; Marco Marigliano; Francesca Olivieri; Claudio Maffeis; Emilio Pedrotti
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.866

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.