Literature DB >> 26313103

Prioritisation of surgery in the National Health Strategic Plans of Africa: a systematic review.

Isabelle Citron1, Linda Chokotho2, Chris Lavy3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disease amenable to surgical intervention accounts for 11-15% of world disability and there is increasing interest in surgery as a global public health issue. National Health Strategic Plans (NHSPs) have been established in most countries and reflect their long-term health priorities, plans, and targets. To assess surgery's perceived importance in Africa, we reviewed its place in all such available plans.
METHODS: We analysed all 43 of the 55 independent countries in Africa that had NHSPs available in the public domain in March, 2014, in English or French. We searched for policies electronically with the search terms "surg*", "ortho*", "trauma", "cancer", "appendic*", "laparotomy", "HIV", "tuberculosis", and "malaria" and included those from 2002 to 2030. We then searched manually for disease prevalence, targets, and human resources.
FINDINGS: Eight (19%)of 43 NHSPs had no mention of surgery or surgical conditions. 28 (65%) of 43 had five or less mentions of surgery. HIV and malaria had 3801 mentions across all the policies compared with surgery with only 379 mentions. Trauma had 243 mentions, while the common surgical conditions of appendicitis, laparotomy, and hernia had no mentions at all. More than 95% (41 of 43) of NHSPs specifically mentioned the prevalences of HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, infant mortality, and maternal mortality. The most commonly mentioned surgical condition for which a prevalence was given was trauma, in only 47% (23 of 43) of policies. All NHSPs had plans and measurable targets for the reduction of HIV and tuberculosis and all but one had targets for malaria, maternal mortality, and child mortality. Of the 4232 health targets across 43 NHSPs, only 96 (2·3%) were related to surgical conditions or surgical care. 14 (33%) of 43 policies had no surgical targets.
INTERPRETATION: NHSPs are the best available measure of health service and planning priorities. It is clear from our findings that surgery is poorly represented and that surgical conditions and surgical treatment are not widely recognised as a public health priority. A paradigm shift is required if surgery is to be considered a public health concern, which should include greater prioritisation in national health strategic policies. FUNDING: None.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26313103     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60848-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  4 in total

Review 1.  Beyond a Moral Obligation: A Legal Framework for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care and Anesthesia.

Authors:  Kashmira S Chawla; Lainie Rutkow; Kent Garber; Adam L Kushner; Barclay T Stewart
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  International pediatric surgery partnerships in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping literature review.

Authors:  Alison Woods; Charles Shofner; Bethany Hodge
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2022-12-31       Impact factor: 2.996

3.  Funding allocation to surgery in low and middle-income countries: a retrospective analysis of contributions from the USA.

Authors:  Lily Gutnik; Joseph Dieleman; Anna J Dare; Margarita S Ramos; Robert Riviello; John G Meara; Gavin Yamey; Mark G Shrime
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Globalization of national surgical, obstetric and anesthesia plans: the critical link between health policy and action in global surgery.

Authors:  Paul Truché; Haitham Shoman; Ché L Reddy; Desmond T Jumbam; Joanna Ashby; Adelina Mazhiqi; Taylor Wurdeman; Emmanuel A Ameh; Martin Smith; Edwin Lugazia; Emmanuel Makasa; Kee B Park; John G Meara
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.185

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.