Literature DB >> 26312863

Emergency department attendance by patients with cancer in the last month of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lesley Henson1, Wei Gao2, Irene Higginson2, Melinda Smith2, Joanna Davies2, Clare Ellis-Smith2, Barbara Daveson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency department visits towards the end of life by people with cancer are increasing over time. This increase has occurred despite evidence of an association with poor patient outcomes, the majority of patients preferring home-based care, and significant overcrowding and capacity concerns for many emergency departments. We aimed to explore factors associated with emergency department attendance by cancer patients in the last month of life.
METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February, 2014, for studies investigating emergency department attendances by adult cancer patients (≥18 years) towards the end of life. No time or language limitations were applied. We performed meta-analysis of factors using a random-effects model, with results expressed as odds ratios (OR) for emergency department attendance. Sensitivity analysis explored heterogeneity.
FINDINGS: 30 studies were identified, reporting three demographic, five clinical, and 13 environmental factors; they included data from five countries and 1 181 842 patients. An increased likelihood of emergency department attendance was found for men versus women (OR 1·24, 95% CI 1·19-1·29), black versus white race (1·45, 1·40-1·50), patients with lung cancer versus other cancers (1·17, 1·10-1·23), and those of lowest versus highest socioeconomic status (1·15, 1·10-1·19). Patients receiving palliative care were less likely than those not receiving palliative care to attend the emergency department in the last month of life (OR 0·43, 95% CI 0·36-0·51).
INTERPRETATION: We have identified demographic (men, black race), clinical (lung cancer), and environmental (low socioeconomic status, no palliative care) factors associated with an increased risk of emergency department attendance. These findings could be used to develop screening interventions and assist policy makers in directing limited resources. Future studies should also investigate previously neglected areas of research, including psychosocial factors, and the emergency care preferences of patients and caregivers. FUNDING: LH is a PhD clinical training fellow and funded through project BuildCARE which is supported by Cicely Saunders International and The Atlantic Philanthropies, and led by King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, UK.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26312863     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60356-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  9 in total

1.  Preparing Oncology Advanced Practice RNs as Generalists in Palliative Care.

Authors:  Betty Ferrell; Pamela Malloy; Rose Virani; Denice Economou; Polly Mazanec
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  Acute care hospitalization near the end of life for cancer patients who die in hospital in Canada.

Authors:  K DeCaria; D Dudgeon; E Green; R Shaw Moxam; R Rahal; J Niu; H Bryant
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  mHealth Technologies for Palliative Care Patients at the Interface of In-Patient to Outpatient Care: Protocol of Feasibility Study Aiming to Early Predict Deterioration of Patient's Health Status.

Authors:  Gudrun Theile; Vanessa Klaas; Gerhard Tröster; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-08-16

4.  Does special education in palliative medicine make a difference in end-of-life decision-making?

Authors:  Reetta P Piili; Juho T Lehto; Tiina Luukkaala; Heikki Hinkka; Pirkko-Liisa I Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  An online international comparison of thresholds for triggering a negative response to the "Surprise Question": a study protocol.

Authors:  Nicola White; Linda Oostendorp; Victoria Vickerstaff; Christina Gerlach; Yvonne Engels; Maud Maessen; Christopher Tomlinson; Johan Wens; Bert Leysen; Guido Biasco; Sofia Zambrano; Steffen Eychmüller; Christina Avgerinou; Rabih Chattat; Giovanni Ottoboni; Carel Veldhoven; Patrick Stone
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Lung cancer and end-of-life care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of aggressive inpatient care.

Authors:  Olivier Bylicki; Morgane Didier; Frederic Riviere; Jacques Margery; Frederic Grassin; Christos Chouaid
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.568

7.  An online international comparison of palliative care identification in primary care using the Surprise Question.

Authors:  Nicola White; Linda Jm Oostendorp; Victoria Vickerstaff; Christina Gerlach; Yvonne Engels; Maud Maessen; Christopher Tomlinson; Johan Wens; Bert Leysen; Guido Biasco; Sofia Zambrano; Steffen Eychmüller; Christina Avgerinou; Rabih Chattat; Giovanni Ottoboni; Carel Veldhoven; Patrick Stone
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Is palliative care support associated with better quality end-of-life care indicators for patients with advanced cancer? A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lucy E Ziegler; Cheryl L Craigs; Robert M West; Paul Carder; Adam Hurlow; Pablo Millares-Martin; Geoff Hall; Michael I Bennett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.

Authors:  Marius Goldkuhle; Vikram M Narayan; Aaron Weigl; Philipp Dahm; Nicole Skoetz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.