BACKGROUND: Uniquely, alloantigen is recognised by two pathways: as intact antigen on the surface of donor antigen-presenting cells (direct) and as self-restricted processed allopeptide (indirect). The indirect pathway is believed to be longlasting, and is generally considered to be a single entity. Here we address how indirect responses against different alloantigens differ in their strength and longevity, and how this knowledge could be used to direct immunoregulatory therapy with antigen-specific regulatory T cells (Tregs). METHODS: A murine model of cardiac transplantation was used (bm12.Kd.IE to C57BL/6). Indirect CD4 T-cell allorecognition of mismatched donor MHC class I and II, and of H-Y minor histocompatibility antigen was assessed by quantifying proliferation of adoptively transferred monoclonal T-cell receptor transgenic T cells (TCR75, Tea, Mar). Antigen presentation by dendritic cells and B cells was assessed by selective depletion with diphtheria toxin or depleting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Tregs were generated by in-vitro culture. FINDINGS: Indirect pathway responses were heterogeneous. Whereas the indirect response against class I alloantigen was longlasting and persistently strong, the response against class II alloantigen decayed within 2 weeks. Leucocyte depletion studies confirmed that this difference was due to rapid destruction of MHC class II expressing donor B cells and dendritic cells in the recipient, whereas anti-class I responses were generated by continual processing of graft parenchymal cells; recognition of donor haemopoietic fraction was not required. Notably, transfer of MHC class I specific Tregs at transplant or 3 weeks later abrogated germinal centre alloantibody responses and blocked development of allograft vasculopathy, whereas class II specific Tregs were ineffective when transferred at the late timepoint. INTERPRETATION: Although indirect allorecognition is considered to be a single entity, our results show that it consists of a number of responses that vary in duration and strength according to target alloantigen. The ability of class I allopeptide specific Tregs, but not class II specific Tregs, to prevent rejection when transferred at a late timepoint suggests that antigen-specific targeting of dominant and longlasting pathways might be particularly effective at preventing chronic rejection. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Training Fellowship.
BACKGROUND: Uniquely, alloantigen is recognised by two pathways: as intact antigen on the surface of donor antigen-presenting cells (direct) and as self-restricted processed allopeptide (indirect). The indirect pathway is believed to be longlasting, and is generally considered to be a single entity. Here we address how indirect responses against different alloantigens differ in their strength and longevity, and how this knowledge could be used to direct immunoregulatory therapy with antigen-specific regulatory T cells (Tregs). METHODS: A murine model of cardiac transplantation was used (bm12.Kd.IE to C57BL/6). Indirect CD4 T-cell allorecognition of mismatched donor MHC class I and II, and of H-Y minor histocompatibility antigen was assessed by quantifying proliferation of adoptively transferred monoclonal T-cell receptor transgenic T cells (TCR75, Tea, Mar). Antigen presentation by dendritic cells and B cells was assessed by selective depletion with diphtheria toxin or depleting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Tregs were generated by in-vitro culture. FINDINGS: Indirect pathway responses were heterogeneous. Whereas the indirect response against class I alloantigen was longlasting and persistently strong, the response against class II alloantigen decayed within 2 weeks. Leucocyte depletion studies confirmed that this difference was due to rapid destruction of MHC class II expressing donor B cells and dendritic cells in the recipient, whereas anti-class I responses were generated by continual processing of graft parenchymal cells; recognition of donor haemopoietic fraction was not required. Notably, transfer of MHC class I specific Tregs at transplant or 3 weeks later abrogated germinal centre alloantibody responses and blocked development of allograft vasculopathy, whereas class II specific Tregs were ineffective when transferred at the late timepoint. INTERPRETATION: Although indirect allorecognition is considered to be a single entity, our results show that it consists of a number of responses that vary in duration and strength according to target alloantigen. The ability of class I allopeptide specific Tregs, but not class II specific Tregs, to prevent rejection when transferred at a late timepoint suggests that antigen-specific targeting of dominant and longlasting pathways might be particularly effective at preventing chronic rejection. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Training Fellowship.