Literature DB >> 26312806

Improving Pediatric Temperature Measurement in the ED.

Beth Hurwitz1, Joanne Brown, Gerry Altmiller.   

Abstract

OVERVIEW: ED care providers have long debated which of the various methods of temperature measurement of pediatric patients is best. While the efficacy and accuracy of temporal artery, tympanic membrane, axillary, and infrared temperature measurement have been studied, the gold standard has been rectal temperature measurement. But despite its accuracy, this method causes children with noninfectious complaints and their families unnecessary distress and adds significant time to the triage process. In response, a group of ED staff nurses at a multihospital health system conducted an evidence-based quality improvement project to determine the best practice for accurate temperature measurement in children younger than five years who presented to the ED. The project included an exhaustive literature search, a review of relevant studies, the development of a table of evidence, a presentation of the findings, and recommendations for practice change. This article describes the project and the adoption of temporal artery thermometry, a painless, noninvasive screening method that provided consistently accurate temperature measurement as well as increased patient and nurse satisfaction and a shorter triage process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26312806     DOI: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000471249.69068.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nurs        ISSN: 0002-936X            Impact factor:   2.220


  2 in total

1.  Effectiveness of thermal screening in detection of COVID-19 among truck drivers at Mutukula Land Point of Entry, Uganda.

Authors:  Andrew Nsawotebba; Ivan Ibanda; Isaac Ssewanyana; Patrick Ogwok; Francis Ocen; Christopher Okiira; Atek Kagirita; Dennis Mujuni; Didas Tugumisirize; Joel Kabugo; Abdunoor Nyombi; Robert Kaos Majwala; Bernard Ssentalo Bagaya; Simeon Kalyesubula-Kibuuka; Willy Ssengooba; Susan Nabadda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Forehead or ear temperature measurement cannot replace rectal measurements, except for screening purposes.

Authors:  Christian Backer Mogensen; Lena Wittenhoff; Gitte Fruerhøj; Stephen Hansen
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.125

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.