OBJECTIVES: to analyse the knowledge, beliefs and perception of the professional role that nursing students have, about exerted violence against women in relationships. METHOD: a descriptive qualitative study following the ecological model through 16 focus groups realized with 112 students from four nursing courses of four Spanish universities. RESULTS: the analytical categories were: knowledge, professional role, and beliefs about ones behaviour before the victim and the abuser. Students are unfamiliar with the characteristics of abuse, guidelines, protocols and screening questions and demand patterns for specific intervention. They do not identify their own professional role, be it delegated or specialized. Beliefs regarding their behaviour with the victim, not guided by professional criteria, perceive violence as a specific situation and disassociate the prevention of health care. They perceive the abuser as mentally ill, justifying the tolerance or delegation of performances. CONCLUSIONS: students define preconceived ideas about couples' violence. Speeches reproduce and reinforce stereotypical myths, values indicative of inadequate training for nursing studies which raises the need to fortify the competencies in relation to intimate couples' violence in the curriculum.
OBJECTIVES: to analyse the knowledge, beliefs and perception of the professional role that nursing students have, about exerted violence against women in relationships. METHOD: a descriptive qualitative study following the ecological model through 16 focus groups realized with 112 students from four nursing courses of four Spanish universities. RESULTS: the analytical categories were: knowledge, professional role, and beliefs about ones behaviour before the victim and the abuser. Students are unfamiliar with the characteristics of abuse, guidelines, protocols and screening questions and demand patterns for specific intervention. They do not identify their own professional role, be it delegated or specialized. Beliefs regarding their behaviour with the victim, not guided by professional criteria, perceive violence as a specific situation and disassociate the prevention of health care. They perceive the abuser as mentally ill, justifying the tolerance or delegation of performances. CONCLUSIONS: students define preconceived ideas about couples' violence. Speeches reproduce and reinforce stereotypical myths, values indicative of inadequate training for nursing studies which raises the need to fortify the competencies in relation to intimate couples' violence in the curriculum.
Couples' violence (La violencia de pareja VP) affects women of all social, cultural and
economic status, given the current alarming proportions it has become an important
public health problem(
1
), associated with high morbidity, mortality and health care
costs(
2
).The National Center for Injury Prevention and Control National(
3
) defines couples' violence as that which occurs between two people in an
intimate relationship (including spouses, partners and ex-partner) over time, from a
single episode to continuous episodes of violence, including four types of behaviours:
physical violence, sexual violence, threats of physical or sexual violence and emotional
abuse.The usual field of VP is the family environment where, a situation of the male dominance
is created over the woman and a reiteration of violent acts with harmful
intentions.(
4
) Globally, it is reported that up to 38% of the murders committed against
women, are carried out by their partners(
1
).The latest data from the European study of 2014 on violence against women, held between
woman of the age of 18 and 74 member countries of the European Union, indicate that
almost 62 million European women had suffered gender violence. 22% of the female
participants reported having experienced physical and / or sexual violence by their
partner or ex-partner(
5
).Equally, the research conducted by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) said that
violence against women inflicted by their intimate companion is widespread in all the
countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. In the 12 countries where the study was
conducted, although figures varied depending on the environment, women reported having
experienced a few times act of violence by an intimate partner(
6
).In the Spanish state the number of complaints registered in the first quarter of 2013
reached 29,487 cases, with an average of 327 daily reports(
7
), although violence against women has been identified as a determinant of
poor health, the health sector has not committed itself enough to eradicate it.
According to several authors(
8
), women victims of VP attend health services more than others and have
poorer health. However, there is an infra-detection(
9
) and this is a concerning motive for the consequences for women and their
health (physical and mental), as well as their quality of life.The importance of screening and intervention from the health sector is obvious,
therefore the World Health Organization (WHO)(
1
) recommends that all professionals in the health department, are to be
trained to understand and act appropriately. Despite these recommendations, detection
difficulties persist among health professionals due to among other reasons, insufficient
training(
10
), attitudes and beliefs of professionals(
11
-
12
).Also, it has been observed that in some Latin American countries in the health field,
violence is still an emerging issue that needs to be analysed by professionals; it is
also necessary to develop help strategies to detect early situations of violence and
intersectoral actions(
13
).These evidences suggest the need for nursing students to acquire during their training,
knowledge and appropriate skills. Several authors corroborate the need to include
training in VP in the nursing curriculum(
14
), with the goal of developing consistent practices and give visibility to
this type of violence(
10
) given the existing evidence regarding curricular deficiencies on the care
nurses need to give in health services(
15
). However, health professionals, particularly nurses are in a privileged
position to identify and help female victims of VP because they are often the first
contact within the health system be it in an emergency, community care or specialized
services(
9
). This position can enable them to offer help and support women in the
search for alternatives. Even so, studies in this area indicate that nurses do not
always feel prepared to intervene in the detection of abuse, keep track of process or
give the necessary support when making a decision (16). The lack of knowledge and skills
can favour nurses to focus solely on the physical care and forget providing
comprehensive care(
11
).Beliefs and myths in terms of those involved in the VP can influence the care health
professionals provide. For what concerns the justification of abuse against women,
professionals and students of Health Sciences highlight the mental disorders as a
characteristic behaviour of aggressors(
17
). There are several myths, like the romantic love that justifies
renunciation and sacrifice of women in many aspects of their lives(
18
).The present study aims to analyse nursing students from different Spanish universities
(Barcelona, Tarragona and Girona), with the following concepts: knowledge, understood
as the use of the theory for nursing practice and research(
19
); beliefs, defined as social representations that arise in everyday social
interaction(
20
) and the perception of the professional role defining the professional role,
according to the International Council of Nurses, as the key nursing roles in promoting
health, preventing illness, restoring health and alleviating suffering(
21
). Thus, the purpose of the study is to identify the obstacles and
difficulties that may affect students in the subsequent exercise of the profession.
Method
Descriptive qualitative study realized during the academic year 2012-2013, in the
Spanish universities of Barcelona (University of Barcelona and the Autonomous University
of Barcelona), Tarragona (Rovira i Virgili University) and Girona (University of
Girona). We chose this type of study because qualitative methodology incorporates
perceptions and beliefs of the participants. On the other hand, the use of qualitative
methodology and to stimulate reflection, allows for more comprehensive access to the
representations that students have about the actions, beliefs and health practices
towards the VP.The framework of this research being part of the review of scientific literature is to
promote awareness of the data and the comparison process. It began with different models
for comprehension and action towards the VP: from gender theories, definitions and
approaches of the OMS about VG(
1
) until the ecological model of Bronfenbrenner(
22
).In the sample study showed 112 students, men and women between 19-35 years old. The aim
was to have a wide variety of students from the most representative of Catalonia (Spain)
public universities, considering that in each academic year an average of 400 students
only enrol at the University of Barcelona, and 90-100 in other universities.Data collection was conducted through focus groups with an average of 11 people per
group from a pre-designed script. Questions were realized regarding knowledge and
beliefs about the definition of violence against women, its causes were conducted,
characteristics of the victim and the aggressor, attitudes towards the victim and the
aggressor and the role and skills of the nurse towards the victims of VP. Homogeneous
groups were formed to achieve maximum integration and interaction among
participants.The 16 focus groups represented one focus group for each university per academic year.
This way at the University of Barcelona 27 students participated, in the Autonomous
University of Barcelona 31, at the University of Girona 30 and at the University Rovira
and Virgili 24.Researchers actively participated in moderating discussion groups, raised the interview
questions in the same order and without influencing the responses and discussion of
participants; They showed neither agree nor disagree in the speech of participants, or
the verbal language or nonverbal. Before each session of a focus group and after each
sessions of analysis and monitoring of activities with the research team in order to
analyse and resolve the doubts, problems or conflicts that may have performed emerged.
In each session the consent of all those who participated in the study was
requested.The selection of participants was made by convenience sampling and students participated
voluntarily. We contacted them in September 2013, when the academic year started. After
being informed about the study, they signed a consent document and were told that their
responses would be confidential, receiving a code to preserve their identity.
Previously, the study was approved by the Commission for Bioethics at the University of
Barcelona, who led the research "Multi centric study on the perception of couples'
violence in nursing students"; authorization has also been requested to the other
participating. The researchers agreed in returning the results to the university, once
the study was done and published.The meeting took place in a classrooms in each of the universities, from October to
December 2013 and January-February 2014. The interviews lasted around an hour and were
recorded on a tape recorder for later transcription. Information was collected until
data saturation.The results were triangulated with the bibliography of information. Analyses were
performed by two different researchers from the focus groups. The obtained results were
organized in codes and categories. Analytical categories were: knowledge, professional
role, and beliefs about the proceedings before the victim and to the aggressor.
Results
Knowledge
For the knowledge category the identified codes were: performance strategies,
standard guidance and unawareness on VP.In regards of strategies of performance in relation to the process of VP, predominant
concern for guidance standards and students demanded patterns of specific and
targeted interventions: I wonder if there is a protocol in nursing we should
know in the event of a possible suspect of gender violence (GBV)
(E14).Unawareness was reflected in some statements that were made by students, focusing on
the detection of the most common symptoms that may present the victims, regardless of
the risk factors that allow early detection and preventing the problem. Know
the warning signs, and know when you might come across a situation where a person
has suffered from physical and psychological (E2).The students were unaware that female victims of VP, attended health care more than
others and have poorer health, with high levels of stress and psychological problems.
Also, many times unaware that their symptoms appeared masked with other symptoms:
repeated consultations for trivial symptoms, somatization, nonspecific psychological
distress and increased use of antidepressants.
Professional role
For the professional role category, it coded: biomedical vision, not assuming the
proper role, nursing skills, delegated care and social role.Regarding the professional role a clinical and biomedical vision persisted of
violence against females was limited to physical damage and excluded health problems
arising from psychological abuse. From this reductionist view, the students eluded
aspects such as social isolation, creating feelings of worthlessness and
helplessness, or continuous personal control by the spouse that impede identifying
the full range of psychological and behavioural symptoms, prior to physical abuse,
causing serious health consequences which they suffered from and often go
unnoticed: Know the signs and symptoms of the abused person
(E3).The students did not assume an own profession attention to violence, ignoring the
holistic and ecological vision: It can be very difficult for an abused woman
to trust a nurse (E4). They considered that the assumption of this
professional responsibility was outside of their jurisdiction and meant neglecting
the welfare work. In addition, they associated resource scarcity and lack of
preparation to the difficulty of providing comprehensive care to women victims of VP:
It would mean neglecting the welfare work (...) we do not have sufficient
resources (E8). What the nurse can do is note it down and refer
to another professional, but we lack preparation for working with women
(E24).One of the reasons justifying the delegation was the lack of competence assumption:
The nurse does not have a prominent role, who must intervene here is a
social worker or a psychologist (E19), or the identification of a
specialized role: It must be a nurse specifically dedicated to all issues of
couples' violence (E29). Nevertheless, they considered their professional
role important from a social perspective: Nursing has a very important role
in society, you're a person close to the people, who can tell you what they feel
... in this case we can detect problems early (E30).
Proceedings towards the victim
Regarding beliefs about the performance with the victim, emerging categories were:
personal ethical standards, training activities, receptive attitude, information,
dangerous attitudes, secondary victimization, prevention and detection.Some students were based on personal ethical standards without considering the need
to abide by professional standards, in which the ethical perspective is conferred
duties and giving information on how to act in certain situations: Acting as
our ethics, notify a psychologist (E7).They did not either consider that control and isolation strategies were part of the
abuse, and presented entertainment to reduce stress and increase well-being. This
action could generate feelings of guilt on the victim, because it aggravates the
problem without offering appropriate solutions: Even if it is not physically,
doing activities to relax, questions, do activities outside your home
environment (E5).Although identified the need to show a receptive attitude that facilitates
verbalization of the problem and to establish a relationship of trust, the students
did not consider the difficulty that many of the female victims of violence have, and
to recognize and denounce attacks since the start. They also limited the professional
behaviour of information, as if the fact of reporting was sufficient to produce
changes in such a complex process: Sensitivity too, (...) empathy (...),
active listening. Create a framework of trust and that person only tells you once
and after recognizing, you inform. Give information and from now on, the decision
is up to the patient.(E65).Some of the students responses also showed dangerous attitudes of unawareness toward
the VP cycle and saw it as something specific: Reassure the victim that the
partner will not re-do it (E45). You can give the phone number
for when the abuse happens (E101).This draws attention to some of the answers of secondary victimization, blames women
themselves from a rehabilitation perspective; Re-educate this person so that
it does not happen again (E98).Although some students mentioned the importance of prevention: (...) I
believe that the nurse has a role in prevention, campaigning and consulting the
CAP (E41), generally they do not integrate to primary health care (she /
it will refer to the CAP as Primary Care Centre), downplaying the health system,
which to some extent justified the lack of involvement of nurses in the prevention
and detection: Talking in institutes, and at schools (E45).
Proceedings before the aggressor
For beliefs category about attitudes towards the aggressor codes were identified:
popular imagination, mental disorders, psychological problems and romantic love.The speech of the participants reflected beliefs that are part of the popular
imagination, that legitimate and minimize the problem and contradict the findings
produced by research. An example of this would be that one of the causes of the VP is
that the offender has a mental illness, a psychological disorder, or an addiction.
From this assumption, the configuration profile offenders as subjects in need of
understanding and healing: As a nurse you have to let the other person
reinsert itself in society, always when this person is curable. (...) Man! Of
course! All offenders have a problem (E97).The belief that the abuser has psychological problems, justified tolerance and
limitation of actions. The students did not take into account the fact that having a
mental disorder does not mean not knowing how to take responsibility, because at some
point this could be an aggravating factor, it is not the cause that justifies the
abuse, because people with mental disorder does not mean they have to be abusers:
As nurses, we have to understand and help these people. If the abuser
comes to tell you that they have a problem, they are already being healed
(E66). Talk with a professional because there is a pathology, you
may need therapy and nurses do not have enough knowledge. (E70).The students also showed instinctive attitudes, more related to the imaginary itself
than with a professional performance: The man who is violent, deserves to be
punished (E22).Romantic love is another myth that appeared in discussions. The cultural model of
love proposes self-renunciation and sacrificing the existence of independence in
order to make the other person the centre of one's life. Individuality, ideas,
projects and goals cease to be the main thing in a woman life in order for someone
else to take the place. This leads to losing her personality and the emergence of a
huge dependence; we live by and thanks to the other. The woman learns to give up, to
give pleasure and not receive the same from her partner: And the way the
person is, I don't know, might even be in love (...) little by little, by being
mistreated, they fully lower themselves (E49).Misconceptions of love and relationships with certain behaviours, authority,
jealousy, control, being obvious that when men use violence what they are aiming for
is to perpetuate submission. From this perspective, affection aggression is separated
and it is seen as a personal control that is justified in terms of other
qualities: controlling and if needed, see it as a sick person, try to
help, provide that psychologists, welcome with open hands with everything we have,
so that the person can or intends to change (E101).
Discussion
Regarding the category knowledge it is relevant to mention that most students
interviewed said to not having acquired the needed knowledge of the VP, nor symptoms
that women can present(
23
). Despite feeling sensitized, they believe they are not prepared to end
their career. The proposed intervention strategies agreed more with the popular
knowledge than with specific training, that was projected in attitudes both to the
victim and to the aggressor, which may aggravate the situation of violence and where
prevention was absent(
24
). This fact reveals the lack of content during their training, both
theoretical and practical, in contradiction with the guidelines of international and
national agencies(1.25).Some authors suggest that nurses, after completing their studies, are poorly prepared to
provide care for female victims of VP and nurses who are trained do so, the majority
(48%), by own initiative(
15
). Professionals are aware that the VP is a significant prejudice to the
health of women and recognize their limitations in knowledge, they feel the need for a
better preparation in order to provide better care, proposing actions to improve their
study through training, sessions, discussions in multidisciplinary teams, providing
activities in health centres and even through agreements with the University(
10
). Some research finds that, students who have received VP training before
graduation, perceive greater knowledge and skills to professionally manage VP
cases(
14
). In this situation, the professionals suggest the possibility of including
the VP theme in the current graduation curriculum, through practices and clinical
experience(
15
).Regarding the professional role, discourse analysis indicates, in part, a lack of
knowledge of this, even though they interviewed seniors who has realized the practices
in the previous key point. This shows that they had not internalized the concept of what
the professional role is, or did not receive any training / information nor by the
tutors or professional assistance, even though the primary health care and the
professionals constituted a key environment as a detection and integrated approach, both
for its accessibility, such as the possibilities of relationship with the patient. This
lack of transmission of skills, in relation to the VP, shows that Spanish Law on
Integral Protection Measures against Gender Violence of 2004 is known for a small
percentage of professionals(
25
).The students do not understand that the care and support of victims should be one of the
responsibilities of nursing, and therefore do not take ownership of the profession's
attention to violence, ignoring the holistic and ecological vision(
24
).Insufficient training / information that could not have been given to the students by
tutors or professionals in primary care centres in Spain, shows that, there may be also
a lack of care coordination. In addition, the students associated the scarcity of
resources and lack of preparation to the difficulty of providing comprehensive services
to female victims of violence care, consistent with some of the studies in the Spanish
state(
24
).The beliefs and stereotypes persist in relation to women, like the vision of romantic
love(
18
) or the attribution of mental disorders aggressors(
17
), leads to erroneous actions.Through speeches we can say that the students conceive violence against women as a
social problem. Such violence is rooted in gender relations based on inequality, from
sexual dimorphism structure social relations, giving meaning and content to what is
being man and woman in society. For this social construct, it is attributed to male
supremacy and therefore the legitimacy to exercise power over the female, thus omitting
a view from complex ecological models that facilitate care from the health sector. These
beliefs impede the detection of abuse in the ED, an example of this are the results from
a qualitative study in the US revealing that in assessing nurses towards VP victims in
an emergency, premium perception in relation to the potential victim before the protocol
suggested by the organization(
11
).In this vein, several authors stress that insufficient knowledge, misconceptions about
the role nurses in detection and intervention as well as the myths related to
socioeconomic status, ethnicity, nationality or culture of the perpetrators and victims
of violence, act as barriers to professional appropriate intervention in cases of
VP(
12
). Hence the importance of focusing on nursing studies efforts to train
future professionals and educators in this area.
Conclusion
The interviewed nursing students have a lack of training on the phenomenon of the VP,
unaware of interview guidelines and protocols which does not include the prevention,
detection and intervention as part of the professional role from a holistic and
ecological perspective.The perception of the VP as "social" health problem transcends competition, avoids
involvement and therefore identify the professional role. The ignorance of the
phenomenon of VP is reflected in popular beliefs and attitudes that scientific,
sometimes dangerous for the victim and the aggressor tolerant.This raises the need for specific and transversal contents on violence against women in
the curricula of the Degree of Nursing, and a joint working between care and teaching,
and the training of health professionals is the main route for early detection of
violence against women, assistance and referral.
Authors: Isabel Montero; Isabel Ruiz-Perez; David Martín-Baena; Marta Talavera; Vicenta Escribà-Agüir; Carmen Vives-Cases Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2011-07-02
Authors: Dora Mariela Salcedo-Barrientos; Paula Orchiucci Miura; Vanessa Dias Macedo; Emiko Yoshikawa Egry Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2014 May-Jun
Authors: Diana Jiménez-Rodríguez; Oscar Arrogante; Maravillas Giménez-Fernández; Magdalena Gómez-Díaz; Nery Guerrero Mojica; Isabel Morales-Moreno Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 3.390