| Literature DB >> 26312194 |
André V Scatigna1, Fernanda A Oliveira2, Camila C Mantello2, Patrícia M Francisco2, Anete P Souza3, André O Simões1.
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Microsatellite markers were developed for the critically endangered carnivorous species Philcoxia minensis (Plantaginaceae) for further population genetic studies aiming at its conservation. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Espinhaço Range; Gratioleae; Philcoxia minensis; Plantaginaceae; conservation genetics; simple sequence repeat (SSR)
Year: 2015 PMID: 26312194 PMCID: PMC4542941 DOI: 10.3732/apps.1500035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Plant Sci ISSN: 2168-0450 Impact factor: 1.936
Characteristics of 17 microsatellite loci that successfully amplified in Philcoxia minensis samples.
| Locus | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Repeat motif | Allele size (bp) | GenBank accession no. | |
| Pm01* | F: CCAACAGAAAAGCCCTAACG | (GA)17 | 234 | 60 | KR019066 |
| R: GCCCACAGTCCCTTGAGTAT | |||||
| Pm02 | F: AAGACGTTTGCCAGCCTTA | (TAG)4(TGTA)3 | 173 | 60 | KR019067 |
| R: TGCATTTATCCCCACAGACA | |||||
| Pm03 | F: CCCAGCTTCACCTCACTCTC | (TCC)5 | 161 | 60 | KR019068 |
| R: CGTTAGGGCTTTTCTGTTGG | |||||
| Pm04 | F: AGTTGCCTTCCATCATCGTT | (GT)5(CT)8 | 156 | 60 | KR019069 |
| R: TGGCTGAGAATCACTGACAAA | |||||
| Pm08* | F: TGAAAACCCCAATCCCATAA | (GT)8 | 232 | 60 | KR019070 |
| R: CACAGGCGTATCAAGGAAGA | |||||
| Pm09 | F: TTGCTTTCCTCTCGGTGTTT | (CT)19 | 214 | 60 | KR019071 |
| R: CATTACTGCACCAAGCCTGA | |||||
| Pm10 | F: TGGCCCTTCTCAGATCTTTC | (AC)9 | 239 | 60 | KR019072 |
| R: ACATAGACCATTCGGGGAGA | |||||
| Pm11 | F: CATTTTTCGTTGTTCCCACA | (CA)11(TC)7 | 183 | 55 | KR019073 |
| R: TACATGCGTTCCAAGCCTAA | |||||
| Pm13 | F: GCGTTCCTTTTTCGATCTGT | (CA)10 | 213 | 60 | KR019074 |
| R: AGCCATGGATATGTTCTCACC | |||||
| Pm15 | F: TCCTAATTGCTTCACGAGCAT | (AC)5(GA)5 | 216 | 60 | KR019075 |
| R: AGCTTTGTCAGGCAGCTCA | |||||
| Pm16 | F: CCAAAGCTACACACCCAACA | (AC)5(ACAAA)3 | 244 | 60 | KR019076 |
| R: TCATATGCTGGGCATACCTG | |||||
| Pm18* | F: AGTCACTGCTTTCAGCCTGTC | (AG)26 | 161 | 60 | KR019077 |
| R: ATGAGATTGCTGAGCCTCGT | |||||
| Pm20 | F: ACTCATAGAGGACACACACAC | (AG)10(AC)10 | 199 | 60 | KR019078 |
| R: TTATTTAGGGGACGGAGAG | |||||
| Pm21 | F: ATCGCTTCCTCCTCCTCTTC | (CA)10 | 181 | 60 | KR019079 |
| R: AACAAAGCTCGCTCGTTCTC | |||||
| Pm22* | F: TGATCGACTTCATGGACACC | (TC)10(CA)9 | 181 | 60 | KR019080 |
| R: CGGGATTCTCTTGCTTAACG | |||||
| Pm26* | F: CTGGCGCTATCCTTCTCAAT | (AC)10 | 246 | 60 | KR019081 |
| R: TGGAGGATGTCTGTTTGTCG | |||||
| Pm27 | F: TTTTTCCAAGAGTCTCTGCAC | (CAAGC)4 | 225 | 60 | KR019082 |
| R: GAGTGAAAGGGTGGTTTGTGA |
Note: Ta = specific annealing temperature.
*Monomorphic loci.
Results of initial polymorphic microsatellite marker screening in the population of Philcoxia minensis (N = 30).
| Locus | Allele size range (bp) | PIC | |||||
| Pm02 | 3 | 163–181 | 0.3 | 0.264 | 0.233 | −0.14 | −0.08 |
| Pm03 | 2 | 163–165 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.032 | 0 | 0 |
| Pm04 | 4 | 146–166 | 0.5 | 0.417 | 0.379 | −0.2 | −0.13 |
| Pm09 | 4 | 192–220 | 0.64 | 0.634 | 0.552 | −0.01 | −0.02 |
| Pm10 | 4 | 239–269 | 0.067 | 0.098 | 0.095 | 0.33* | 0.30 |
| Pm11 | 3 | 177–185 | 0.448 | 0.402 | 0.361 | −0.12 | −0.06 |
| Pm13 | 4 | 109–215 | 0.367 | 0.434 | 0.389 | 0.16** | 0.15 |
| Pm15 | 4 | 214–220 | 0.364 | 0.518 | 0.418 | 0.30** | 0.17 |
| Pm16 | 2 | 242–244 | 0 | 0.089 | 0.083 | 1.00* | 0.71 |
| Pm20 | 4 | 189–201 | 0.552 | 0.591 | 0.527 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| Pm21 | 5 | 155–185 | 0.773 | 0.655 | 0.577 | −0.18* | −0.12 |
| Pm27 | 3 | 221–227 | 0.455 | 0.502 | 0.391 | 0.1 | 0.05 |
Note: A = number of alleles sampled; FIS = inbreeding coefficient index; FNULL = occurrence of null alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; PIC = polymorphism information content.
Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.
Markers with the probability of occurrence of null alleles.