| Literature DB >> 26312183 |
Simon Kennedy1, Pasquale Maffia2,3,1, Junxi Wu4, Gianluca Grassia2,3, Helen Cambrook2, Armando Ialenti3, Neil MacRitchie2, Jaclyn Carberry1, Roger M Wadsworth4, Catherine Lawrence4.
Abstract
Objective. Emerging evidence suggests an important role for mast cells in vein graft failure. This study addressed the hypothesis that perivascular mast cells regulate in situ vascular inflammatory and proliferative responses and subsequent vein graft neointimal lesion formation, using an optimized local mast cell reconstitution method. Methods and Results. Neointimal hyperplasia was induced by insertion of a vein graft into the right carotid artery in wild type and mast cell deficient Kit(W-sh/W-sh) mice. In some experiments, mast cells were reconstituted systemically (tail vein injection of bone marrow-derived mast cells) or locally (directly into the right neck area) prior to vein grafting. Vein graft neointimal lesion formation was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in Kit(W-sh/W-sh) mice. Mast cell deficiency reduced the number of proliferating cells, and inhibited L-selectin, CCL2, M-CSF and MIP-3α expression in the vein grafts. Local but not systemic mast cell reconstitution restored a perivascular mast cell population that subsequently promoted neointimal formation in mast cell deficient mice. Conclusion. Our data demonstrate that perivascular mast cells play a key role in promoting neointima formation by inducing local acute inflammatory and proliferative responses. These results suggest that ex vivo intraoperative targeting of mast cells may have therapeutic potential for the prevention of pathological vein graft remodeling.Entities:
Keywords: Mast cells; Neointima; Vein graft
Year: 2015 PMID: 26312183 PMCID: PMC4548472 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Perivascular accumulation of MCs in vein graft correlates with neointima formation.
MC anatomical distribution in vein grafts was assessed using (A) Texas Red-Avidin staining (arrows indicate mast cells; Bar = 100 µm) or (B) Toluidine Blue staining, showing perivascular MC accumulation in WT vein grafts 28 days following surgery. (C) MC number increased in vein grafts and correlated with neointima formation up to 4 weeks (n = 4–9). Y axis on the left represents mast cell density, ∗P < 0.05 vs. day 1–3; +P < 0.05 vs. day 7. Y axis on the right represents neointima area: $P < 0.05 vs. day 1–3. Error bars show the standard error of the mean. Data are analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 2Reconstitution of WT mast cells to KitW−sh/W−sh mice.
(A) WT BMMCs were cultured and characterized by flow cytometry with anti-FcεRI and anti-c-Kit antibodies. 90% of the living cells were positive for both FcεRI and c-Kit. (B) Systemic administration of BMMCs via tail vein achieved multiple organ reconstitution (skin shown in figure), however, no MCs were detected in the vascular wall of the aorta or in the vein graft 28 days after surgery (Solid bar in left panels = 100 µm; dashed bar in right panels = 200 µm). (C) Local reconstitution restored mast cells in KitW−sh/W−sh vein grafts (Bar = 100 µm). No mast cells were found in any other organ or tissue. Data corresponds to twelve mice per group (WT) and six mice per group (KitW−sh/W−sh+lcMC). Error bars show the standard error of the mean. No statistical difference was detected between groups by Student’s t-test. (D) MCs increase neointimal formation in vein grafts. Upper panel: the neointimal area of 28-day-old vein grafts from wild type (WT) mice, KitW−sh/W−sh mice with or without systemic (KitW−sh/W−sh +sysMC) or local (KitW−sh/W−sh +lcMC) MC reconstitution. Individual data points represent average value per mouse; horizontal bars denote mean. ∗P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Lower panel: representative pictures (H&E) of cross sections of vein graft middle portion from respective groups. The dashed circle indicates the border of neointima. (Bar = 500 µm).
Figure 3MCs increase vascular inflammatory and proliferative response.
Cytokine expression profile in vein graft protein extracts (A) and serum (B) at day 7. ND, Not detectable. Error bars show the standard error of the mean. ∗P < 0.05 by unpaired Student’s t-test (n = 5 for vein graft samples and n = 9–10 for serum samples). (C) Proliferating cells in vein grafts at day 7 were identified by anti-PCNA staining. Sections incubated with the secondary antibody alone were used as negative control (NC). (Bar = 100 µm). (D) The percentage of proliferating cells was quantified and data presented as mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05 by unpaired Student’s t-test. (E) The total leukocytes (CD45) as well as the subsets of B cells (B220), T cells (CD3), CD11b+ve, and CD11c+ve cells in the WT and KitW−sh/W−sh vein grafts were quantified by flow cytometry at 28 days. Data correspond to five mice per group. Error bars show the standard error of the mean. No statistical difference was detected between groups by Student’s t-test.