| Literature DB >> 26312065 |
Min-Ho Joe1, Ji-Youn Kim2, Sangyong Lim2, Dong-Ho Kim2, Suk Bai3, Hyun Park4, Sung Gu Lee4, Se Jong Han4, Jong-Il Choi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lignocellulosic biomass has long been recognized as a potential sustainable source of sugars for biofuels. However, many physicochemical structural and compositional factors inhibit the enzymatic digestibility of the lignocellulosic biomass. In this study, efficient pretreatment method of rice straw (RS) was developed and the RS hydrolysate was applied in the cultivation of microalgae for lipid production.Entities:
Keywords: Gamma ray irradiation; Lipid; Microalgae; Pretreatment; Rice straw
Year: 2015 PMID: 26312065 PMCID: PMC4549949 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0308-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Effect of pretreatments of rice straw on its main components
| Pretreatment conditions | Composition analysis of rice straw (w/w, %)a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose | Xylan | Klason lignin | Water-soluble extractives | Water content | |
| Untreated | 37.5 | 10.5 | 18.4 | 9.3 | 9.7 |
| 25 kGy | 37.1 | 10.8 | 18.2 | 9.2 | 9.6 |
| 50 kGy | 37.4 | 10.6 | 18.3 | 9.5 | 9.3 |
| 75 kGy | 37.3 | 10.3 | 18.2 | 9.4 | 9.1 |
| 100 kGy | 37.9 | 10.6 | 18.5 | 9.4 | 9.1 |
| NaOH | 52.7 | 6.0 | 14.1 | 8.3 | 5.4 |
| 25 kGy + NaOH | 52.7 | 5.9 | 13.6 | 8.1 | 5.5 |
| 50 kGy + NaOH | 54.2 | 5.8 | 12.5 | 8.1 | 4.3 |
| 75 kGy + NaOH | 56.9 | 4.4 | 11.5 | 7.2 | 4.3 |
| 100 kGy + NaOH | 60.0 | 3.8 | 11.0 | 6.3 | 4.0 |
aResults are expressed as an average percentage of the components obtained from triplicate assays
Elemental composition before and after the combined pretreatment
| Elements (mg/Kg) | Untreated | 100 kGy + NaOH |
|---|---|---|
| Al | 156.83 ± 8.12 | 58.29 ± 5.65 |
| As | 1.21 ± 0.03 | NDa |
| Ca | 1605.93 ± 21.30 | 2805.35 ± 123.53 |
| Cd | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
| Cr | 30.44 ± 1.43 | 14.30 ± 0.36 |
| Cu | 2.71 ± 0.06 | 6.46 ± 0.41 |
| Fe | 185.21 ± 6.36 | 215.27 ± 15.74 |
| K | 3743.71 ± 0.32 | 169.11 ± 12.96 |
| Mg | 629.97 ± 7.06 | 1016.06 ± 46.19 |
| Mn | 304.73 ± 12.51 | 515.47 ± 48.62 |
| Mo | 0.33 ± 0.01 | NDa |
| Na | 98.70 ± 0.95 | 383.19 ± 17.76 |
| Ni | 2.84 ± 0.19 | 2.01 ± 0.1 |
| Phosphate | 356.86 ± 5.83 | 73.55 ± 4.95 |
| Pb | 3.22 ± 0.02 | 5.12 ± 1.48 |
| Sulfate | 304.12 ± 1.09 | 277.20 ± 12.93 |
| Zn | 38.06 ± 0.43 | 55.49 ± 3.51 |
Data are expressed as means of triplicate measurements ± standard deviations
aBelow the detection limit
Fig. 1Effect of gamma irradiation on the pretreatment of rice straw with NaOH. a glucose saccharification yield based on the theoretical maximum and b xylose saccharification yield
Fig. 2Effect of Cellic CTec2 loading on the hydrolysis of pretreated rice straw and glucose concentration in hydrolysate
Fig. 3Growth and lipid content of C. protothecoides from glucose and rice straw hydrolysate. Open and closed circles the residual glucose concentration and cell concentration in glucose, respectively. Open and closed triangles the residual glucose concentration and cell concentration in the rice straw hydrolysate, respectively. a heterotrophic culture condition with an equivalent glucose concentration of 10 g/L and b mixotrophic culture condition with an equivalent glucose concentration of 10 g/L
Fatty acid composition of lipid extracts of C. protothecoides in different carbon sources
| Components | Relative FAME content (%)a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heterotrophic cultivation | Mixotrophic cultivation | |||
| Glucose | RSH | Glucose | RSH | |
| 7,10-Hexadecadienoic acid, methyl ester | 2.13 | 2.30 | 9.02 | 1.64 |
| 7,10,13-Hexadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester | 3.11 | 3.91 | 4.17 | 5.90 |
| Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 15.38 | 16.26 | 20.40 | 20.56 |
| Heptadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.48 |
| 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester | 16.91 | 17.10 | 10.52 | 11.59 |
| 9-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 51.37 | 47.57 | 31.81 | 34.77 |
| 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester | 9.57 | 10.93 | 21.76 | 23.14 |
| Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 1.05 | 1.32 | 1.74 | 1.92 |
| Total lipid/cell dry weight (%) | 55.77 | 54.97 | 56.37 | 55.10 |
| Total fatty acid/cell dry weight (%) | 45.62 | 45.37 | 40.95 | 40.04 |
| Total fatty acid/total lipid (%) | 81.80 | 82.54 | 72.65 | 72.66 |
| Total fatty acid yield (g/L) | 4.00 | 2.95 | 2.63 | 1.57 |
aFAME composition is reported as weight percent of all FAMEs