Seung-Ju Yi1, Jin-Seop Kim2. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Andong Science College, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Sunmoon University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to present aerobic exercise that can be performed together with respiratory muscle strength training and examine whether the vital capacity of individuals can be enhanced when respiratory muscle strength training is conducted together with aerobic exercise. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 10 male students and 8 female students. The sling exercise method was used to conduct three types of training to strengthen the muscles around the shoulder joints. A maximal respiratory quotient measurement device was used to measure the vital capacity of the subjects five times. [Results] There was a significant difference in each respiratory training time point compared with before the performance of respiratory training. [Conclusion] This study presented respiratory muscle strength training using a sling as a training method for respiratory training.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to present aerobic exercise that can be performed together with respiratory muscle strength training and examine whether the vital capacity of individuals can be enhanced when respiratory muscle strength training is conducted together with aerobic exercise. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 10 male students and 8 female students. The sling exercise method was used to conduct three types of training to strengthen the muscles around the shoulder joints. A maximal respiratory quotient measurement device was used to measure the vital capacity of the subjects five times. [Results] There was a significant difference in each respiratory training time point compared with before the performance of respiratory training. [Conclusion] This study presented respiratory muscle strength training using a sling as a training method for respiratory training.
Ventilation between air and blood occurs through neurological control of the respiratory
muscles1). Muscles related to respiration
may be divided into inspiratory and expiratory muscles. Major muscles engaging in
inspiration include the diaphragm and external intercostal muscle, and minor muscles
engaging in inspiration encompass the sternocleidomastoid muscle, scalene muscle, trapezius
muscle, pectoralis major muscle, pectoralis minor muscle, and serratus anterior muscle.
These muscles act during forced expiration. Expiratory muscles that do not act in normal
respiration but do act in strong respiration include the rectus abdominis muscle, musculus
transversus abdominis, external/internal oblique abdominal muscle, and internal intercostal
muscle. Weakening of the respiratory system muscles is a risk factor for cardiovascular
disease, and these muscles play a role in reducing the pressure of the lower abdomen during
respiration2, 3). Therefore, it has been reported that respiratory muscle strength
training not only improves motor ability but also decreases dyspnea and nocturnal
desaturation4). For such a reason, in the
clinical field, medical devices are used as interventions to improve the respiratory muscles
of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, spinal cord injury, and
muscle disease. To improve respiration and prevent respiratory diseases, devices such as
high-frequency chest wall oscillations devices, flutters, positive-pressure masks, and
resistance breathing devices are used. Respiratory muscle training conducted with assistive
devices for respiration has brought about improvements in respiratory muscles5, 6).
According to recent research, inspiratory muscle training using inspiratory resistance
devices strengthens inspiratory muscles7),
and respiratory training and the strengthening of inspiratory muscles has been shown to
improve the quality of life of stroke patients8). Researchers have also reported that assistive devices like balloons
may improve the vital capacity of smokers9). However, previous researchers mostly conducted respiratory muscle
training using assistive devices, and physical training to strengthen respiratory muscles
has been lacking. In actuality, when aerobic exercise was conducted together with breathing
exercise, respiratory muscles and pulmonary functions were enhanced10, 11). Therefore, the
purpose of this study was to present aerobic exercise that can be performed together with
respiratory muscle strength training and examine whether the vital capacity of individuals
can be enhanced when respiratory muscle strength training is conducted together with aerobic
exercise.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
This study was conducted from May 27 to July 26, 2013, and involved 18 undergraduates
living in Andong City, Republic of Korea. The subjects who participated in this study
voluntarily participated, and consent to take part in this study was obtained from them.
Among the subjects, there were 10 male students and 8 female students. Their average age,
height, and weight were 21.5 years old, 168.5 cm, and 63 kg, respectively. The rate of
smokers was 44.44%, and the average duration of smoking was 3.5 years. A maximal respiratory
quotient measurement device (Personal Best full range flow meter, Philips Respironice,
Parsippany, NJ, USA) was used to measure the vital capacity of the subjects five times—prior
to the exercise, two weeks after the exercise, four weeks after the exercise, six weeks
after the exercise, and eight weeks after the exercise. The subjects sat in a chair, spread
their shoulders, and grabbed the measurement device. Three measured values under the maximal
expiratory condition were averaged. The sling exercise method was used to conduct three
types of training to strengthen the muscles around the shoulder joints. The subjects
conducted shoulder internal rotation, shoulder external rotation, and push-ups. Figure 1 shows a subject engaging in shoulder internal rotation. As a starting posture, the
subjects spread their legs shoulder-width apart and looked straight forward in a neutral
position. They then put on a wide sling band around their abdomen with their shoulders
spread at 90 degrees and their elbows spread at 90 degrees, conducted external rotation of
the shoulders while tilting their bodies forward, and conducted inspiration. Then again in
the starting posture, the subjects conducted internal rotation of the shoulders and
expiration. Figure 2 shows external rotation of the shoulder joints. As a starting posture, the subjects
stood on a reference line facing backward with their legs shoulder-width apart and looked
straight forward in a neutral position. They then put a wide band around their abdomen and
put down the red line to the location of acromion, maintained shoulder abduction at 90
degrees and elbow flexion at 90 degrees, and tilted their body backward. While internally
rotating their shoulders, they pulled their body forward and breathed in, and at a starting
posture again, they externally rotated their shoulders and breathed out. Figure 3 displays a subject doing a push-up. As a starting posture, the subjects spread their
legs shoulder-width apart on a reference line and looked straight forward in a neutral
position. They then put a broad band around their chest, and pulled down the red line to
their finger joints, maintained shoulder flexion at 90 degrees and full elbow extension,
spread their shoulders, and tilted their body forward and breathed in. At the starting
posture again, they adducted their shoulders and breathed out. Three sets of the main
exercise, with 10 repetitions per set, were conducted three times a week for eight weeks.
The subjects rested for one minute between each set. Time required to perform all the
exercises was 30 minutes. SPSS 18.0 version was used for statistical analysis in this study.
In order to verify the normality of this study results, the Shapiro-Wilk test was conducted;
the results were found to be normally distributed. Descriptive statistics were used to
measure the general characteristics of the subjects. Repeated-measured analysis of variance
was used to measure the effects of the muscle strengthening exercise; changes in vital
capacity at each time point of measurement were measured. A paired comparison was conducted
to look at differences in measurement time points. The significance level was set at
0.05.
The results of this study revealed that there were significant differences among each of
the respiratory training time points compared with before the performance of respiratory
training (p<0.05). The paired comparison results showed that the eight weeks of
respiratory training led to significant improvements compared with before the training and
two weeks after the training (p<0.05). When respiratory training was conducted for six
weeks, there were significant improvements compared with before the training (p<0.05).
The results of the respiratory training according to whether the subjects smoked or not
revealed that there was no significant interaction (p>0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1.
The result of the respiratory muscle strengthening exercise (n=18)
0 weeks(M±SD)
2 weeks(M±SD)
4 weeks(M±SD)
6 weeks(M±SD)
8 weeks(M±SD)
f
Duration × smoker
Nonsmoker(ml)
419.0(71.4)
444.0(78.6)
464.0(71.0)
468.0(66.0)
510.0(63.6)
10.4*
0.4
Smoker(ml)
375.0(51.6)
398.8(35.6)
400.0(56.1)
411.3(74.3)
412.5(61.8)
*p<0.05, M±SD: mean ± standard deviation
*p<0.05, M±SD: mean ± standard deviation
DISCUSSION
This study was conducted to examine the effects of respiratory muscle strengthening and
aerobic exercises for eight weeks using a sling on the vital capacity of individuals and to
present an effective exercise method. According to the results, aerobic exercise combined
with respiratory muscle strengthening exercise for at least six weeks improved the vital
capacity of the subjects. Walker et al.12)
who obtained results similar to those of the present study, used an upper limb ergometer to
measure the effect of exercise to improve muscle strength and enhance respiratory functions
of spinal cord injurypatients. HajGhanbari et al.13) reported that diverse muscle strengthening and endurance training
for respiratory muslces improved the motor and respiration abilities of sports athletes.
Therefore, it is considered that the vital capacity of the subjects in the present study
also improved because of enhancement of the strength and endurance of respiratory peripheral
muscles using a sling. In the present study, respiratory training was conducted together
with muscle strength training, and the motions of breathing in and out strengthened
inspiratory muscles as well as expiratory muscles. Likewise, Kim and Lee9) reported that when expiratory muscles were
strengthened with a balloon, the respiratory function of the subjects was improved. Sutbeyaz
et al.8) reported that when inspiratory
muscle training was conducted for six weeks, the respiratory function of strokepatients
improved. This is due to the fact that respiratory function efficiency can be explained by
the organic relationship between inspiration and expiration, and strengthening of the
expiratory muscles has a close mutual relationship with inspiratory ability14). In the present study, there was a
significant difference between the time before the training and after six weeks of training.
The changes in respiratory capabilities by the sixth week likely occurred because training
two to three times per week for at least six weeks may change muscle strength15). Increased muscle strength improves the
maximal oxygen intake amount as well as muscle endurance. In a similar study, Fiser et
al.16) achieved results similar to those
of the present study: rapid response training such as walking increased the maximal oxygen
intake amount and muscle strength of elderly people. Bossers et al.17) reported that when muscle strengthening exercise was
conducted together with aerobic exercise, there was a physical advantage, which was similar
to the findings of the present study showing that combined with strengthening of respiratory
peripheral muscles improved vital capacity. In the present study, the subjects showed
changes in their amount of respiration by the sixth week of the intervention. However, Kim
et al.7) reported that training using an
assistive device for four weeks improved pulmonary functions. Sutbeyaz et al.8) noted that respiratory function improved
when respiratory training was conducted for at least six weeks. Kim and Lee9) reported that blowing balloons for eight
weeks resulted in improved respiratory ability. There are various views on exercise period,
and therefore further research is considered necessary. The reason for the diverse results
is because of differences in subjects and interventions. With regard to changes in the
amount of respiration of the subjects according to whether they smoked or not, there was no
interaction in the present study. Unlike the present study, Nowak et al.18) reported that subjects who smoked for a
long time would have an obvious negative effect due to excessive stress on their lungs. On
the contrary, the subjects who participated in the present study were young healthy adults,
and therefore, there was probably no interaction between exercise and whether they smoked or
not. Similar to the findings of the present study, Taito et al.19) reported that after smokers and nonsmokers received
training of moderate intensity, there was no interaction between their oxygen consumption
amount and whether they were smokers or not. The present study has several limitations.
First, the participants were ordinary people. Second, there was no direct comparison of
respiratory muscle strength training programs with and without assistive devices. Therefore,
future research should be conducted in which the number of subjects is larger and
respiratory muscle strength training programs with and without assistive devices are
compared. In conclusion, this study presented respiratory muscle strength training using a
sling as a training method for respiratory training because such training may improve the
amount of respiration of individual.
Authors: Luci F Teixeira-Salmela; Verônica F Parreira; Raquel R Britto; Tereza C Brant; Erika P Inácio; Thais O Alcântara; Ivana F Carvalho Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: J van der Palen; T D Rea; T A Manolio; T Lumley; A B Newman; R P Tracy; P L Enright; B M Psaty Journal: Thorax Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Willem J R Bossers; Erik J A Scherder; Froukje Boersma; Tibor Hortobágyi; Lucas H V van der Woude; Marieke J G van Heuvelen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anthony F DiMarco; Robert T Geertman; Kutaiba Tabbaa; Gregory A Nemunaitis; Krzysztof E Kowalski Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 1.985