Literature DB >> 26311716

Surveillance endoscopy is associated with improved outcomes of oesophageal adenocarcinoma detected in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.

Hashem B El-Serag1, Aanand D Naik1, Zhigang Duan1, Mohammad Shakhatreh1, Ashley Helm1, Amita Pathak1, Marilyn Hinojosa-Lindsey1, Jason Hou1, Theresa Nguyen1, John Chen2, Jennifer R Kramer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of surveillance endoscopy in patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BE) for reducing oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)-related mortality in patients with BE is unclear.
METHODS: This is a cohort study of patients with BE diagnosed in the National Veterans Affairs hospitals during 2004-2009 excluding those with conditions that affect overall survival. We identified those diagnosed with EAC after BE diagnosis through 2011 and conducted chart reviews to identify BE surveillance programme, and indication for EAC diagnosis, verify diagnosis, stage, therapy and cause of death. We examined the association between surveillance indication for EAC diagnosis with or without surveillance programme and EAC stage and treatment receipt in logistic regression models, and with time to death or cancer-related death using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: Among 29 536 patients with BE, 424 patients developed EAC during a mean follow-up of 5.0 years. A total of 209 (49.3%) patients with EAC were in BE surveillance programme and were diagnosed as a result of surveillance endoscopy. These patients were more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage (stage 0 or 1: 74.7% vs 56.2, p<0.001), survived longer (median 3.2 vs 2.3 years; p<0.001) and have lower cancer-related mortality (34.0% vs 54.0%, p<0.0001) and had a trend to receive oesophagectomy (51.2% vs 42.3%; p=0.07) than 215 patients diagnosed by non-BE surveillance endoscopy (17.2% of whom were BE surveillance failure). BE surveillance endoscopy was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-related death (HR 0.47, 0.35 to 0.64), which was largely explained by the early stage of EAC at the time of diagnosis. Similarly, the adjusted mortality for patients with cancer in a prior surveillance programme for overall death was 0.63 (0.47 to 0.84) compared with patients with cancer not in a surveillance programme.
CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance endoscopy among patients with BE is associated with significantly better EAC outcomes including cancer-related mortality compared with other non-surveillance endoscopy. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  DECISION ANALYSIS; HEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26311716     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  44 in total

Review 1.  Magnitude of Missed Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kavel Visrodia; Siddharth Singh; Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; David A Ahlquist; Kenneth K Wang; Prasad G Iyer; David A Katzka
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  The Annual Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Does Not Decrease Over Time in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Theresa Nguyen; Aaron P Thrift; Xiaoying Yu; Zhigang Duan; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Barrett's esophagus: best practices for treatment and post-treatment surveillance.

Authors:  Nabil M Mansour; Hashem B El-Serag; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

4.  Regional Variability of Repeat Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Use in the National Veteran Population.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Garrett Cole; Nan Hu; William K Thompson; John Fang; Matthew Samore
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Editorial: Best Practices in Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Srinivas Gaddam
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Fouad Otaki; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett's oesophagus in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Mimi C Tan; Nabil Mansour; Donna L White; Amy Sisson; Hashem B El-Serag; Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 8.  Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: How Common Are They Really?

Authors:  Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Endoscopic surveillance or ablation for Barrett's esophagus?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Nina Saxena
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-12-06

10.  Rates and predictors of progression to esophageal carcinoma in a large population-based Barrett's esophagus cohort.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Bijan Borah; Herbert Heien; Ananya Das; Amitabh Chak; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.