Literature DB >> 26311181

A positive feedback at the cellular level promotes robustness and modulation at the circuit level.

Julie Dethier1, Guillaume Drion2, Alessio Franci3, Rodolphe Sepulchre4.   

Abstract

This article highlights the role of a positive feedback gating mechanism at the cellular level in the robustness and modulation properties of rhythmic activities at the circuit level. The results are presented in the context of half-center oscillators, which are simple rhythmic circuits composed of two reciprocally connected inhibitory neuronal populations. Specifically, we focus on rhythms that rely on a particular excitability property, the postinhibitory rebound, an intrinsic cellular property that elicits transient membrane depolarization when released from hyperpolarization. Two distinct ionic currents can evoke this transient depolarization: a hyperpolarization-activated cation current and a low-threshold T-type calcium current. The presence of a slow activation is specific to the T-type calcium current and provides a slow positive feedback at the cellular level that is absent in the cation current. We show that this slow positive feedback is required to endow the network rhythm with physiological modulation and robustness properties. This study thereby identifies an essential cellular property to be retained at the network level in modeling network robustness and modulation.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central pattern generators; modulation; networks; postinhibitory rebound; robustness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26311181      PMCID: PMC4620135          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00471.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  52 in total

Review 1.  Cellular, synaptic and network effects of neuromodulation.

Authors:  Eve Marder; Vatsala Thirumalai
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul

2.  Analytic expressions for rate and CV of a type I neuron driven by white gaussian noise.

Authors:  Benjamin Lindner; André Longtin; Adi Bulsara
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 3.  Motor-pattern-generating networks in invertebrates: modeling our way toward understanding.

Authors:  R L Calabrese; E De Schutter
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  A database of computational models of a half-center oscillator for analyzing how neuronal parameters influence network activity.

Authors:  Anca Doloc-Mihu; Ronald L Calabrese
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 5.  Modulation of neural networks for behavior.

Authors:  R M Harris-Warrick; E Marder
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Reciprocal inhibition and postinhibitory rebound produce reverberation in a locomotor pattern generator.

Authors:  R A Satterlie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Propagating activity patterns in large-scale inhibitory neuronal networks.

Authors:  J Rinzel; D Terman; X Wang; B Ermentrout
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Computational models of neuromodulation.

Authors:  J M Fellous; C Linster
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Phase response properties of half-center oscillators.

Authors:  Calvin Zhang; Timothy J Lewis
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 10.  Neuromodulation of neuronal circuits: back to the future.

Authors:  Eve Marder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  10 in total

1.  Rebound from Inhibition: Self-Correction against Neurodegeneration?

Authors:  Shobhana Sivaramakrishnan; William P Lynch
Journal:  J Clin Cell Immunol       Date:  2017-03-13

2.  Robust and tunable bursting requires slow positive feedback.

Authors:  Alessio Franci; Guillaume Drion; Rodolphe Sepulchre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The central pattern generator underlying swimming in Dendronotus iris: a simple half-center network oscillator with a twist.

Authors:  Akira Sakurai; Paul S Katz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Computational implications of biophysical diversity and multiple timescales in neurons and synapses for circuit performance.

Authors:  Julijana Gjorgjieva; Guillaume Drion; Eve Marder
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Circuit Robustness to Temperature Perturbation Is Altered by Neuromodulators.

Authors:  Sara A Haddad; Eve Marder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Bursting emerges from the complementary roles of neurons in a four-cell network.

Authors:  Akira Sakurai; Paul S Katz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A Consistent Definition of Phase Resetting Using Hilbert Transform.

Authors:  Sorinel A Oprisan
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2017-05-03

8.  Analysis of Family Structures Reveals Robustness or Sensitivity of Bursting Activity to Parameter Variations in a Half-Center Oscillator (HCO) Model.

Authors:  Anca Doloc-Mihu; Ronald L Calabrese
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-08-30

9.  Switchable slow cellular conductances determine robustness and tunability of network states.

Authors:  Guillaume Drion; Julie Dethier; Alessio Franci; Rodolphe Sepulchre
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Circuit Stability to Perturbations Reveals Hidden Variability in the Balance of Intrinsic and Synaptic Conductances.

Authors:  Sebastian Onasch; Julijana Gjorgjieva
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.