Filippo Mariano1, Maurizio Morselli2, Zsuzsanna Holló1, Fulvio Agostini3, Maurizio Stella4, Luigi Biancone5. 1. Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto U, Dipartimento di Medicina Generale e Specialistica, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Ospedale CTO, Torino, Italy. 2. Biochimica Clinica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Laboratorio, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Ospedale CTO, Torino, Italy. 3. Anestesia e Rianimazione 5, Dipartimento di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Ospedale CTO, Torino, Italy. 4. Chirurgia Plastica Grandi Ustionati, Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialistica, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Ospedale CTO, Torino, Italy. 5. Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto U, Dipartimento di Medicina Generale e Specialistica, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Ospedale CTO, Torino, Italy Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto U, Dipartimento di Medicina Generale e Specialistica, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Universita' Degli Studi di Torino, Ospedale CTO, Torino, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The heparin requirement for coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) is usually high. Heparin administration often cannot be adherent to prescription, leading to a premature clotting of circuit and an insufficient volume of treated plasma. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) could be an attractive alternative; however, no data are available on citrate pharmacokinetics at high levels of circuit citratemia. METHODS: Fifteen septic shock patients with acute kidney injury undergoing CPFA with RCA at target circuit citratemia of 6 mmol/L were treated with CPFA-haemofiltration in pure predilution (CPFA-HF predilution group, n = 5 patients), or predilution haemodiafiltration (CPFA-HDF predilution group, n = 5 patients) or pre- and postdilution haemofiltration (CPFA-HF pre/postdilution group, n = 5 patients). Citrate pharmacokinetics was carried out through its determination in systemic and circuit blood, and effluent at time 0, 0.2, 1, 3, 6 and 9 h. RESULTS: The systemic concentrations of citrate in the CPFA-HF predilution group significantly increased over the sessions (from basal level of 0.21 to 0.76 mmol/L at 3 h), whereas they did not change in CPFA-HDF predilution and CPFA-HF pre/postdilution groups. Circuit plasma citrate concentrations (from 3 to 8 mmol/L) correlated strongly with circuit iCa++ levels (Spearman R = -0.7022, P < 0.01). Sieving coefficients of citrate were near the unit in all three groups and unrelated to blood and infusion flow rates in predilution. However, the amount of citrate removed by effluent was ∼40% for the CPFA-HF predilution group and reached 60% for both the CPFA-HDF predilution and CPFA-HF pre/postdilution groups (P < 0.05). As for the efficiency of plasmafiltration, the plasmafiltrate volume (from 17 to 20 mL/kg/day) was not significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that in refractory septic shock patients on CPFA at circuit citratemia of 6 mmol/L both HDF predilution and HF pre/postdilution were the best dialysis modalities to maintain a normal systemic citratemia through a high rate of citrate loss in the effluent.
BACKGROUND: The heparin requirement for coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) is usually high. Heparin administration often cannot be adherent to prescription, leading to a premature clotting of circuit and an insufficient volume of treated plasma. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) could be an attractive alternative; however, no data are available on citrate pharmacokinetics at high levels of circuit citratemia. METHODS: Fifteen septic shockpatients with acute kidney injury undergoing CPFA with RCA at target circuit citratemia of 6 mmol/L were treated with CPFA-haemofiltration in pure predilution (CPFA-HF predilution group, n = 5 patients), or predilution haemodiafiltration (CPFA-HDF predilution group, n = 5 patients) or pre- and postdilution haemofiltration (CPFA-HF pre/postdilution group, n = 5 patients). Citrate pharmacokinetics was carried out through its determination in systemic and circuit blood, and effluent at time 0, 0.2, 1, 3, 6 and 9 h. RESULTS: The systemic concentrations of citrate in the CPFA-HF predilution group significantly increased over the sessions (from basal level of 0.21 to 0.76 mmol/L at 3 h), whereas they did not change in CPFA-HDF predilution and CPFA-HF pre/postdilution groups. Circuit plasma citrate concentrations (from 3 to 8 mmol/L) correlated strongly with circuit iCa++ levels (Spearman R = -0.7022, P < 0.01). Sieving coefficients of citrate were near the unit in all three groups and unrelated to blood and infusion flow rates in predilution. However, the amount of citrate removed by effluent was ∼40% for the CPFA-HF predilution group and reached 60% for both the CPFA-HDF predilution and CPFA-HF pre/postdilution groups (P < 0.05). As for the efficiency of plasmafiltration, the plasmafiltrate volume (from 17 to 20 mL/kg/day) was not significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that in refractory septic shockpatients on CPFA at circuit citratemia of 6 mmol/L both HDF predilution and HF pre/postdilution were the best dialysis modalities to maintain a normal systemic citratemia through a high rate of citrate loss in the effluent.