| Literature DB >> 26310927 |
Lotta Herling1,2,3, Jonas Johnson4, Kjerstin Ferm-Widlund5, Peter Lindgren6, Ganesh Acharya7,8,9, Magnus Westgren10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) can be used to assess fetal cardiac function and it has been shown to detect changes associated with hypoxia in animal models. However, the analysis is cumbersome and time consuming. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a new algorithm developed for the automated analysis of color TDI velocity recordings of the fetal myocardium. Furthermore, we wanted to assess the effect of different sizes of region of interests (ROI) on the measurement of cardiac cycle time intervals and myocardial velocities at different gestations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26310927 PMCID: PMC4549943 DOI: 10.1186/s12947-015-0034-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Fig. 1The position of region of interest (ROI). The left panel indicates position of the eight different ROI sizes in gestational age group III in the left ventricular wall. Different colors indicate different ROI sizes (height × width). Yellow (2 × 2 mm), turquoise (3 × 3 mm), red (4 × 3 mm), green (4 × 4 mm), orange (6 × 3 mm), pink (6 × 4 mm), grey (8 × 3 mm) and blue (8 × 4 mm). The right panel shows the velocity traces produced. Sm = peak systolic myocardial velocity. Em = peak early diastolic myocardial velocity. Am = peak myocardial velocity during atrial contraction
Fig. 2Definition of cardiac cycle time intervals. The different cardiac cycle time intervals are displayed at the top. a A myocardial velocity trace analyzed with the automated algorithm. b A myocardial velocity trace analyzed manually. c An acceleration trace where shifts have been identified manually in order to define cardiac cycle time intervals. d Estimated opening and closure of mitral valve (MO/MC) and aortic valve (AO/AC). e Estimated ECG reading indicating the likely position of P, Q, R and T wave
Fig. 3Typical acceleration traces. The left panel shows a trace with an acceleration score of 1, the middle panel with an acceleration score of 2 and the right panel with an acceleration score of 3
Region of Interest (ROI) sizes
| Gestational age group | ROI size (mm) | Acceleration score 3 traces (n) | Length of the septum (mm) | ROI length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA I (18–24 weeks) | 2 × 2 | 6 | 13 % | |
| 3 × 2 | 6 | 15.6 ± 2.3 | 19 % | |
| 4 × 2 | 5 | 26 % | ||
| GA II (25–32 weeks) | 2 × 2 | 5 | 9 % | |
| 3 × 3 | 8 | 23.3 ± 2.6 | 13 % | |
| 4 × 3 | 10 | 17 % | ||
| 6 × 3 | 11 | 26 % | ||
| GA III (33–41 weeks) | 2 × 2 | 4 | 6 % | |
| 3 × 3 | 5 | 9 % | ||
| 4 × 3 | 5 | 12 % | ||
| 4 × 4 | 7 | 32.5 ± 2.0 | 12 % | |
| 6 × 3 | 9 | 18 % | ||
| 6 × 4 | 9 | 18 % | ||
| 8 × 3 | 11 | 25 % | ||
| 8 × 4 | 12 | 25 % |
ROI size is presented as height × width, length of the septum as mean ± SD and ROI length as % of septal length
Difference in peak myocardial velocities between different ROI lengths according to gestational age (GA) group
| ROI length (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | |
| Δ Sm (%) | ||||
| GA I | −3.49 (14) | −9.27 (19) | ||
| GA II | −1.57 (7) | −1.04 (11) | −8.19 (16) | |
| GA III | −2.86 (9) | −4.60 (17) | −9.24 (16) | −15.79 (16) |
| Δ Em (%) | ||||
| GA I | −1.18 (9) | −6.27 (10) | ||
| GA II | −0.11 (7) | −0.70 (11) | −1.93 (20) | |
| GA III | −3.16 (14) | −5.98 (18) | −8.46 (27) | −13.49 (31) |
| Δ Am (%) | ||||
| GA I | −2.34 (6) | −8.62 (9) | ||
| GA II | −4.78 (8) | −8.71 (16) | −13.66 (16) | |
| GA III | −2.11 (6) | −5.22 (6) | −7.74 (14) | −9.52 (20) |
Data are presented as median difference (Δ) % (interquartile range) compared to the reference ROI of 2×2 mm. ROI = region of interest. Sm = peak systolic myocardial velocity. Em = peak early diastolic myocardial velocity. Am = peak myocardial velocity during atrial contraction. GA I – gestational age group I. GA II – gestational age group II. GA III – gestational age group III
Fig. 4Difference in peak myocardial velocities between different ROI sizes. Sm = peak systolic myocardial velocity. Em = peak early diastolic myocardial velocity. Am = peak myocardial velocity during atrial contraction. ROI – region of interest
Difference in percentage for time intervals between different ROI lengths compared to the reference ROI
| ROI length (mm) | Atrial contraction | Pre-ejection | Ventricular ejection | Post-ejection | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA I | 3 | −1.04 (5) | 0.92 (5) | 0.00 (2) | 1.94 (7) |
| 4 | −3.18 (5) | 0.59 (9) | 0.00 (3) | 1.55 (7) | |
| GA II | 3 | 0.00 (6) | 0.00 (4) | 0.00 (2) | 0.88 (7) |
| 4 | 1.13 (8) | 1.25 (4) | 0.26 (2) | 0.54 (8) | |
| 6 | −1.43 (7) | 0.97 (6) | −0.30 (2) | 1.97 (9) | |
| GA III | 3 | −1.75 (7) | 1.09 (8) | −0.02 (4) | 1.69 (4) |
| 4 | −0.06 (6) | −0.21 (9) | 0.10 (4) | 1.83 (6) | |
| 6 | 0.07 (11) | 0.67 (10) | 0.14 (4) | 2.59 (8) | |
| 8 | −1.09 (9) | 0.71 (13) | 0.20 (3) | 2.57 (6) |
Data are presented as median difference (Δ) % (interquartile range) compared to the reference ROI of 2×2 mm. ROI = region of interest. GA I – gestational age group I, GA II – gestational age group II, GA III – gestational age group III