Literature DB >> 26310591

Children's self reported discomforts as participants in clinical research.

Mira S Staphorst1, Joke A M Hunfeld2, Suzanne van de Vathorst3, Jan Passchier4, Johannes B van Goudoever5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is little empirical evidence on children's subjective experiences of discomfort during clinical research procedures. Therefore, Institutional Review Boards have limited empirical information to guide their decision-making on discomforts for children in clinical research. To get more insight into what children's discomforts are during clinical research procedures, we interviewed a group of children on this topic and also asked for suggestions to reduce possible discomforts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six children (aged 6-18) participating in clinical research studies (including needle-related procedures, food provocation tests, MRI scans, pulmonary function tests, questionnaires) were interviewed about their experiences during the research procedures. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews.
RESULTS: The discomforts of the interviewed children could be divided into two main groups: physical and mental discomforts. The majority experienced physical discomforts during the research procedures: pain, shortness of breath, nausea, itchiness, and feeling hungry, which were often caused by needle procedures, some pulmonary procedures, and food provocation tests. Mental discomforts included anxiousness because of anticipated pain and not knowing what to expect from a research procedure, boredom and tiredness during lengthy research procedures and waiting, and embarrassment during Tanner staging. Children's suggestions to reduce the discomforts of the research procedures were providing distraction (e.g. watching a movie or listening to music), providing age-appropriate information and shortening the duration of lengthy procedures. DISCUSSION: Our study shows that children can experience various discomforts during research procedures, and it provides information about how these discomforts can be reduced according to them. Further research is needed with larger samples to study the number of children that experience these mentioned discomforts during research procedures in a quantitative way.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Child; Clinical research procedures; Discomfort; Ethics; Experience; Self-report

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26310591     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

1.  The development of the DISCO-RC for measuring children's discomfort during research procedures.

Authors:  Mira S Staphorst; Reinier Timman; Jan Passchier; Jan J V Busschbach; Johannes B van Goudoever; Joke A M Hunfeld
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 2.  Association of diabetes mellitus and structural changes in the central nervous system in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ata Pourabbasi; Mehdi Tehrani-Doost; Soqra Ebrahimi Qavam; Seyed Masoud Arzaghi; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2017-03-03

3.  A comparison study of anxiety in children undergoing brain MRI vs adults undergoing brain MRI vs children undergoing an electroencephalogram.

Authors:  Charlotte Jaite; Viola Kappel; Adriane Napp; Marcus Sommer; Gerd Diederichs; Bernhard Weschke; Birgit Spors; Arpad von Moers; Ulrike Lehmkuhl; Christian J Bachmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Consent to research participation: understanding and motivation among German pupils.

Authors:  Jana Reetz; Gesine Richter; Christoph Borzikowsky; Christine Glinicke; Stephanie Darabaneanu; Alena Buyx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  The child's perspective on discomfort during medical research procedures: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Mira S Staphorst; Marc A Benninga; Margriet Bisschoff; Irma Bon; Jan J V Busschbach; Kay Diederen; Johannes B van Goudoever; Eric G Haarman; Joke A M Hunfeld; Vincent V W Jaddoe; Karin J M de Jong; Johan C de Jongste; Angelika Kindermann; Marsh Königs; Jaap Oosterlaan; Jan Passchier; Mariëlle W Pijnenburg; Liesbeth Reneman; Lissy de Ridder; Hyke G Tamminga; Henning W Tiemeier; Reinier Timman; Suzanne van de Vathorst
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.