| Literature DB >> 26310526 |
Shin-Ae Park1, Eun-Kyung Lee1, Hannah Song1, Yong-Tae Kim1.
Abstract
Ag is considered to be one of the best candidates for al">oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts in alkaline media for application in various electrochemical energy devices. In this study, we demonstrate that <span class="Chemical">water activation is a key factor in enhancing the ORR activity in alkaline media, unlike in acid environments. Ag supported on LaMnO3 having a high oxophilicity showed a markedly higher ORR activity than that on carbon with inert surfaces. Through various electrochemical tests, it was revealed that the origin of the enhanced ORR activity of Ag/LaMnO3 is the bifunctional effect mainly due to the water activation at the interface between Ag and LaMnO3. Furthermore, the ligand effect due to the charge transfer from Mn to Ag leads to the enhancement of both oxygen activation on Ag and water activation on Mn sites, and hence, an improvement in the ORR activity of Ag/LaMnO3. On the other hand, the strain effect based on the fine structure variation in the lattice was negligible. We therefore suggest that the employment of a co-catalyst or support with highly oxophilic nature and the maximization of the interface between catalyst and support should be considered in the design of electrocatalysts for the ORR in alkaline media.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26310526 PMCID: PMC4550837 DOI: 10.1038/srep13552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1TEM micrographs of (a) Ag/LaMnO3 and (b) Ag/C.
Figure 2XRD patterns of (a) Ag/LaMnO3, (b) Ag/C, and (c) LaMnO3.
Rietveld refined structural parameters of LaMnO3.
| Atom position | x | y | z | B/Å2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LaMnO3 | ||||
| space group R-3c (No.167) | ||||
| a = 5.5265(1) b = 5.5265(1) c = 13.3545(1) | ||||
| Rp = 4.34 Rwp = 5.62 Rexp = 4.51 S = 1.25 | ||||
| La | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| Mn | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| O | 0.444(2) | 0.0 | 0.25 | 0.3 |
Note. Isotropic thermal parameters (B) are fixed to be 0.3 Å2.
Figure 3Oxygen reduction polarization curves for Ag/C, Ag/C + LaMnO3 and Ag/LaMnO3 at 1600 rpm in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at 10 mV s−1, and (b) Koutecky–Levich plots of the ORR for Ag/C, Ag/C + LaMnO3 and Ag/LaMnO3.
Figure 4ORR scheme at around −0.1 V vs. Hg/HgO for Ag/C and Ag/LaMnO3.
Figure 5RRDE measurements of the ORR for carbon, LaMnO3, Ag/C, Ag/C + LaMnO3 and Ag/LaMnO3 at 1600 rpm in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at 10 mV s−1.
Collection efficiency N = 0.37; ring potential Er = 0.3 V vs. Hg/HgO.
Figure 6ORR scheme at around −0.2 V vs. Hg/HgO for LaMnO3 and Ag/LaMnO3.
Figure 7XPS for (a) Mn 2p of Ag/LaMnO3 and LaMnO3, and (b) Ag 3d of Ag/LaMnO3 and Ag/C.
Figure 8Mn L2,3 edge EELS obtained from Ag/LaMnO3 and LaMnO3.
The electron occupied states for s, p, d, and f and the calculated charge transfer of LaMnO3, Ag/LaMnO3, and Ag/C.
| Element | s | p | d | f | qi | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LaMnO3 | La | 2.110 | 6.160 | 1.210 | 0 | 1.520 |
| Mn | 0.350 | 0.530 | 5.620 | 0 | 0.490 | |
| O | 1.850 | 4.820 | 0 | 0 | −0.670 | |
| Ag/LaMnO3 | Ag | 0.912 | 0.398 | 9.872 | 0 | −0.181 |
| La | 2.068 | 6.101 | 1.252 | 0 | 1.578 | |
| Mn | 0.330 | 0.448 | 5.618 | 0 | 0.600 | |
| O | 1.857 | 4.804 | 0 | 0 | −0.665 | |
| Ag/C | Ag | 0.818 | 0.183 | 9.862 | 0 | 0.136 |
| C | 1.169 | 2.865 | 0 | 0 | −0.033 |
Figure 9Fourier transforms of EXAFS spectra at the Ag K-edge of (a) Ag/C and (b) Ag/LaMnO3.
Curve fitting results of the EXAFS data at Ag K-edge of the catalysts.
| shell | N | R(Å) | σ2(Å) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag/C | Ag-Ag | 9.6 | 2.86(1) | 0.01 |
| Ag/LaMnO3 | Ag-Ag | 10.1 | 2.85(1) | 0.01 |