Literature DB >> 26310489

Correlations between female breast density and biochemical markers.

Ji-Hye Kim1, Hae-Kag Lee2, Jae-Hwan Cho3, Hyong-Keun Park4, Han-Jun Yang3.   

Abstract

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to identify biochemical markers related to breast density. The study was performed with 200 patients who received mammography and biochemical marker testing between March 1, 2014 to October 1, 2014.
[Subjects and Methods] Following the American College of Radiology, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS), breast parenchymal pattern density from mammography was categorized into four grades: grade 1, almost entirely fat; grade 2, fibroglandular densities; grade 3, heterogeneously dense; and grade 4, extremely dense. Regarding biochemical markers, subjects underwent blood and urine tests after a 12-h fast. We analyzed correlations among breast density, general characteristics, and biochemical markers.
[Results] Breast density-related factors were age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), hematocrit, MCH, RDW, AST, ALT, ALP, uric acid, γGT, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol.
[Conclusion] The results can be used as basic and comparative data for the prevention and early control of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical marker; Breast density; Related factors

Year:  2015        PMID: 26310489      PMCID: PMC4540825          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.2097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

It is known that breast density is a risk factor of breast cancer. A woman who has more than 75% breast density is 4–6 times more likely to have breast cancer than a woman who has a breast density of less than 25%1). Guidelines for breast cancer screening have been suggested, and women over 50 years old are generally recommended to undergo mammography. One study even says women in their 40s can also increase their lifespan through mammography, recommending they too should undergo mammography2, 3). One of the key factors that affects mammography’s sensitivity is breast density. Not only does higher breast density mean a higher chance of having breast cancer, but breast density can also cause false negatives and increase re-examination rates by lowering mammography’s sensitivity4, 5). Breast density is affected by race, age, BMI, and the level of female sex hormones. In particular, body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for breast cancer in women who are in menopause. It has also been shown in several pilot studies that abdominal obesity and weight increase, even after correcting for BMI, have some connection with the increased rate of breast cancer after menopause6, 7). As the amount of body fat grows due to obesity, so does the amount of fatty tissue generally, and eventually the density in mammography decreases. As mentioned above, some factors related to breast density have been reported, but they are only basic characteristics. Thus, this study examined biochemical markers related to breast density.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study subjects were 230 patients who underwent mammography and biochemical marker tests between March 1 and October 1, 2014, at Soonchunhyang University hospital. All the subjects signed a written informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board of Soonchunhyang University Hospital. Subjects who may have had abnormal bone density levels, such as diabetic patients, fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl, ≥ 7.0 mmol/l, or those who had taken hormone treatment for over a year were excluded, and we chose only post-menopausal women. Six diabetic patients, 14 before menopause, and 10 hormone treatment patients were excluded, leaving 200 subjects whose average age was 48.64±10.92 yrs. To perform mammography, we used a LORAD Elite Trex Mammo (TREX-LORAD, USA) at 26 kVp and 80 mAs. The American College of Radiology, Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (ACR BI-RADS, USA) categorizes breast parenchymal pattern density from mammography into four grades: grade 1, almost entire fat; grade 2, fibroglandular densities; grade 3, heterogeneously dense; and grade 4, extremely dense (Fig. 1). Height and weight were measured with an automatic height and weight scale, and body mass index (BMI) was computed using the formula weight (kg)/height squared (m2).
Fig. 1.

Mammography. a) represents almost entirely fat, b) represents fibroglandular densities, c) represents heterogeneously dense, and d) represents extremely dense

Mammography. a) represents almost entirely fat, b) represents fibroglandular densities, c) represents heterogeneously dense, and d) represents extremely dense Subjects fasted for at least 12 h before blood and urine collections for biochemical marker tests. Fifty items were assayed: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), platelet count, red cell distribution width (RDW), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil (%), lymphocyte (%), monocytes (%), eosinophil (%), basophil (%), neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocytes, eosinophil, basophil, HbA1C, protein, albumin, glucose, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid, calcium, phosphrus, gamma-glutamyl transferase (γGT), lactate dyhydrogenase (LDH), amylase, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL-cholesterol), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-Cholesterol), iron (Fe), total iron binding capacity (TIBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), rheumatoid factor (RA factor), HIV Combo, HBsAg, AntiHBs, α-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), free thyroxine (Free T4), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), anti-hepatitis-C (Anti HCV). The data were collected as study variables. Simple correlation analysis was performed to investigate correlations among breast density, general characteristic, and biochemical markers. Then, multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the factors that showed a significant correlation. SPSS software (ver.18.0, Chicago, USA) with a significance of 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

The simple correlation analysis of breast density, general characteristics, and biochemical markers before and after menopause is shown in Table 1. Items exhibiting significant correlations with breast density were: age, −0.55; height, 0.26; weight, −0.30; BMI, −0.48; hematocrit, −0.15; MCH, −0.19; RDW, 0.15; glucose, −0.15; AST(GOT), −0.22; ALT(GPT), −0.27; ALP, −0.28; uric acid, −0.16; γGT(GGT), −0.18; triglyceride, −0.30; total cholesterol, −0.16; HDL-cholesterol, 0.23; and LDL-cholesterol, −0.29 (p < 0.05). The results of multiple regression analysis using breast density-related variables are shown in Table 2. Significant factors were: age, −0.04±0.00, height, 0.04±0.01; weight, −0.03±0.01; BMI, −0.13±0.02; T-score, 0.13±0.05; hematocrit, −0.01±0.00; MCH, −0.06±0.02; RDW, 0.08±0.04; AST(GOT), −0.01±0.00; ALT(GPT), −0.02±0.00; ALP, 0.00±0.00; uric acid, −0.03±0.01; γGT(GTP), −0.01±0.00; triglyceride, 0.00±0.00; total cholesterol, 0.00±0.00; HDL-cholesterol, 0.02±0.00; and LDL-cholesterol, −0.01±0.00 (p < 0.05).
Table 1.

Simple correlation analysis of breast density, general characteristics, and biochemical markers

VariableBreastdensityVariableBreastdensityVariableBreastdensityVariableBreastdensity
Age−0.55Neutrophil %0.05AST (GOT)−0.22TIBC0.00
Height0.28Lymphocyte %−0.07ALT (GPT)−0.27CRP−0.13
Weight−0.30Monocytes %0.06ALP−0.28RA factor0.03
BMI−0.48Eosinophil %0.04Urea Nitrogen−0.07HIV Combo−0.04
ESR−0.07Basophil %0.03Creatinine−0.10HBsAg−0.09
WBC−0.12Neutrophil−0.06Uric acid−0.16AntiHBs0.06
RBC0.01Lymphocyte−0.04Calcium−0.09AFP−0.03
Hemoglobin−0.14Monocytes0.05Phosphorus−0.06CA 19-90.02
Hematocrit−0.15Eosinophil−0.02γGT−0.18CA 1250.04
MCV−0.13Basophil−0.08LDH−0.05Free T40.11
MCH−0.19HbA1C−0.10Amylase0.03TSH0.05
MCHC−0.05Protein−0.02Triglyceride−0.30AntiHCV−0.12
Platelet count−0.04Albumin0.04Cholesterol, Total−0.16
RDW0.15Glucose−0.15HDL-Cholesterol0.23
PDW−0.10Bilirubin, Total0.07LDL-Cholesterol−0.29
MPV0.07Bilirubin, Direct0.09Iron0.00

BMI: body mass index, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, WBC: white blood cell, RBC: red blood cell, MCV: mean corpuscular volume, MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC: mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, RDW: red cell distribution width, PDW: platelet distribution width, MPV: mean platelet volume, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, γGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase, LDH: lactate dyhydrogenase, HDL-cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein, LDL-cholesterol: low-density lipoprotein, TIBC: total iron binding capacity, CRP: C-reactive protein, RA factor: rheumatoid factor, AFP: α-fetoprotein, CA19-9: carbohydrate antigen 19-9, CA-125: cancer antigen 125, Free T4: free thyroxine, TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone, Anti HCV: anti-hepatitis-C

Table 2.

Multiple regression analysis of each variable related to breast density

VariableBSE
Age−0.040.00
Height0.040.01
Weight−0.030.01
BMI−0.130.02
Hematocrit−0.010.00
MCH−0.060.02
RDW0.080.04
AST−0.010.00
ALT−0.020.00
ALP0.000.00
Uric acid−0.030.01
γGT−0.010.00
Triglyceride0.000.00
Cholesterol, total0.000.00
HDL-cholesterol0.020.00
LDL-cholesterol−0.010.00

BMI: body mass index, MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin, RDW: red cell distribution width, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, γGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase, HDL-cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein, LDL-cholesterol: low-density lipoprotein

BMI: body mass index, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, WBC: white blood cell, RBC: red blood cell, MCV: mean corpuscular volume, MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC: mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, RDW: red cell distribution width, PDW: platelet distribution width, MPV: mean platelet volume, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, γGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase, LDH: lactate dyhydrogenase, HDL-cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein, LDL-cholesterol: low-density lipoprotein, TIBC: total iron binding capacity, CRP: C-reactive protein, RA factor: rheumatoid factor, AFP: α-fetoprotein, CA19-9: carbohydrate antigen 19-9, CA-125: cancer antigen 125, Free T4: free thyroxine, TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone, Anti HCV: anti-hepatitis-C BMI: body mass index, MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin, RDW: red cell distribution width, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, γGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase, HDL-cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein, LDL-cholesterol: low-density lipoprotein

DISCUSSION

Of the many risk factors that cause breast cancer, the best known is long-term exposure to female sex hormones8,9,10,11,12). It has been reported that as estrogen levels increase, so does the risk of breast cancer13). Additionally, breast density has a high correlation with breast cancer; as breast density increases, women are more likely to have breast cancer8). Factors that affect breast density include race, age, BMI, and levels of female sex hormones6, 7). In this study, the factors related to breast density were age, height, weight, BMI, hematocrit, MCH, RDW, AST, ALT, ALP, uric acid, γGT, triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol. Breast density, in general, is related to estrogen. After menopause, breast tissue degenerates due to the decline in estrogen and progesterone, and breast density starts to decrease due to an increase in fatty tissue14). Bone density level, breast density, and breast cancer are related. In this study, BMI and breast density showed a correlation. Studies of Western women reported BMI as one of the major factors that affecting breast density15, 16). According to those studies, when BMI was low, even after correcting for age, it indicated high density breasts. the proportion of dense breast was 60% in low-weight women under age 40, similar to the results of our present study. A limitation of this study was that, because there were a small number of subjects, it was difficult to identify correlations between breast density and biochemical markers objectively. Thus, an effort is needed to make more precise risk evaluations of breast density by conducting a large-scale prospective study of Korean women.
  13 in total

1.  Likelihood of additional work-up among women undergoing routine screening mammography: the impact of age, breast density, and hormone therapy use.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Claudia J Kasales; Anna N A Tosteson; Julia E Weiss; Martha E Goodrich; Steven P Poplack; Wendy S Wells; Linda Titus-Ernstoff
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  The case for individualized screening recommendations for breast cancer.

Authors:  Angela Bradbury; Olufumilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Effect of obesity on screening mammography: outcomes analysis of 88,346 consecutive examinations.

Authors:  K A Hunt; E A Sickles
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies.

Authors:  T Key; P Appleby; I Barnes; G Reeves
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the Guernsey prospective studies.

Authors:  Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Bianca De Stavola; Diane S Allen; Juan J Pérez-Gavilán; Jorge M Ferreira; Ian S Fentiman; Isabel Dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Gillian Reeves; Valerie Beral; Diana Bull; Barbara Crossley; Moya Simmonds; Elizabeth Hilton; Stephen Bailey; Nigel Barrett; Peter Briers; Ruth English; Alan Jackson; Elizabeth Kutt; Janet Lavelle; Linda Rockall; Matthew G Wallis; Mary Wilson; Julietta Patnick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

Review 7.  Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies.

Authors:  Andrew G Renehan; Margaret Tyson; Matthias Egger; Richard F Heller; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Functionality in Women with Breast Cancer: The Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Flávia Nascimento de Carvalho; Anke Bergmann; Rosalina Jorge Koifman
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-05-29

9.  The Effect of a PNF Technique Program after Mastectomy on Lymphedema Patients' Depression and Anxiety.

Authors:  Kyungjin Ha; Seungjun Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-07-30

10.  Influence of Wearing a Brassiere on Pain and EMG Activity of the Upper Trapezius in Women with Upper Trapezius Region Pain.

Authors:  Kyue-Nam Park; Jae-Seop Oh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-10-28
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of increasing maximal aerobic exercise on serum gonadal hormones and alpha-fetoprotein in the luteal phase of professional female soccer players.

Authors:  Aynur Otağ; Muhsin Hazar; İlhan Otağ; Malik Beyleroğlu
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-03-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.