Literature DB >> 26309813

Neurotranscriptome profiles of multiple zebrafish strains.

Ryan Y Wong1, John Godwin2.   

Abstract

Behavioral displays or physiological responses are often influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms in the context of the organism's evolutionary history. Understanding differences in transcriptome profiles can give insight into adaptive or pathological responses. We utilize high throughput sequencing (RNA-sequencing) to characterize the neurotranscriptome profiles in both males and females across four strains of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Strains varied by previously documented differences in stress and anxiety-like behavioral responses, and generations removed from wild-caught individuals. Here we describe detailed methodologies and quality controls in generating the raw RNA-sequencing reads that are publically available in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE61108).

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA-sequencing; brain; gene expression; sex; zebrafish

Year:  2015        PMID: 26309813      PMCID: PMC4542015          DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Data        ISSN: 2213-5960


Direct link to deposited data

The raw FASTQ files can be accessed through the Gene Expression Omnibus. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE61108.

Experimental design, materials and methods

In this study we analyzed the whole-brain transcriptome profiles of male and female zebrafish (Danio rerio) in four different strains [1], [2]. In brief, 17 week old zebrafish were quickly sacrificed and whole-brains were removed and processed for RNA-sequencing. Sequencing reads were subsequently aligned, analyzed, and quantified using open-source software. We also conducted technical and biological validation and replication of the RNA-sequencing results using quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (for overview of procedures, see Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Workflow for collecting and processing the neurotranscriptome in each zebrafish strain.

Animal subjects

Zebrafish cohorts were generated and reared using previously described methods [3]. All fish were kept in mixed sex 100-liter tanks. Tanks were on a custom-built recirculating filtration system with water temperature kept at 28 °C and on a 12:12 light:dark cycle. Fish were fed twice daily with commercial feed (Tetramin). The AB and Scientific Hatcheries (SH) zebrafish strains originated from commercial suppliers (Zebrafish International Resource Center and Scientific Hatcheries, respectively). Although the AB and SH strains were bred in laboratory conditions for many generations at their respective stock centers, these strains were maintained in our laboratory for four and one generations, respectively. The two other strains (High Stationary Behavior (HSB); Low Stationary Behavior (LSB)) of zebrafish originated from approximately 200 wild caught individuals and were six generations removed from the wild (see [3] for additional selective breeding details).

Tissue collection

We collected whole brains from 160 individual zebrafish (n = 20 for each sex for each strain) that were 17 weeks post-fertilization. Between 09:00–12:00 we quickly removed fish from their home tanks, deeply anesthetized with tricaine methanesulfonate, followed by decapitation. Whole brains were removed within 3 min of being caught and placed in RNAlater (Ambion). After storing the samples at 4 °C overnight, we removed all RNAlater and stored brains at − 80 °C until RNA extraction. Sex was assigned by observation of testes or ovaries on dissection.

RNA isolation

We extracted total RNA using column purification (RNeasy Plus Mini Kit, Qiagen). Brains were homogenized for 3 min at maximum speed with 50–100 μl of zirconium oxide beads (Bullet Blender, Next Advance) in 0.6 ml of Buffer RLT (Qiagen) with 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma). We then added 100 μl of chloroform, mixed, and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. We subsequently centrifuged the samples at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to the RNeasy genomic DNA column (Qiagen) and then we proceeded according to the manufacturer's instructions. All samples were eluted with 30 μl of DEPC-treated water (Ambion).

RNA-sequencing library preparation and sequencing

For each strain we pooled 1 μg of total RNA from 10 same sex individuals into a biological replicate. This generated four biological replicates for each strain (two biological replicates for each sex). We analyzed the quantity and quality of the RNA for the 16 samples with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent). All samples were of high quality (RIN > 8.0, Table 1). Using 1 μg of total RNA from the pooled samples we generated cDNA libraries following the manufacturer's protocol (TruSeq RNA Sample Prep V2, Illumina). We ligated a unique Illumina Index adapter to each biological replicate to allow for multiplexing. After cDNA library synthesis we submitted samples to the Genomic Sciences Laboratory at North Carolina State University for 72 bp single-end RNA sequencing (Illumina GAIIx). We followed a balanced block design [4] and multiplexed all 16 samples and ran them across 16 lanes.
Table 1

RNA characteristics of biological replicates as measured by a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent).

Sample name in GSE61108StrainSexRNA concentration (ng/μl)RNA integrity number
AB female rep1ABFemale69.888.5
AB female rep2ABFemale70.588.5
AB male rep1ABMale67.768.5
AB male rep2ABMale73.168.6
SH female rep1Scientific HatcheriesFemale66.128.6
SH female rep2Scientific HatcheriesFemale90.588.5
SH male rep1Scientific HatcheriesMale118.388.7
SH male rep2Scientific HatcheriesMale105.768.7
LSB female rep1Low Stationary BehaviorFemale88.88.4
LSB female rep2Low Stationary BehaviorFemale69.888.4
LSB male rep1Low Stationary BehaviorMale54.148.7
LSB male rep2Low Stationary BehaviorMale57.528.4
HSB female rep1High Stationary BehaviorFemale71.488.5
HSB female rep2High Stationary BehaviorFemale89.628.7
HSB male rep1High Stationary BehaviorMale82.38.5
HSB male rep2High Stationary BehaviorMale75.628.5

Data processing

With reads that passed default quality controls (Illumina), we combined across lanes for each biological replicate. Total read counts varied between 34–65 million reads (Table 2). We utilized the open source software GSNAP [5] to align the reads to the zebrafish genome. We first built GSNAP genomic and GSNAP known and novel splice site databases using the Zv9 (release 71) D. rerio genome and gene sets, respectively (Ensembl). For each biological replicate we successfully aligned over 99% of the reads (assessed by SAMtools [6]) to the zebrafish genome using the default GSNAP parameters (Table 2).
Table 2

Sequenced library characteristics.

Sample name in GSE61108StrainSexRead countReads aligning to zebrafish genome (%)
AB female rep1ABFemale63,333,52299.2863542
AB female rep2ABFemale48,539,38999.194584
AB male rep1ABMale52,400,10699.2919213
AB male rep2ABMale42,245,84099.2484941
SH female rep1Scientific HatcheriesFemale65,493,70799.257547
SH female rep2Scientific HatcheriesFemale60,919,45799.2179313
SH male rep1Scientific HatcheriesMale59,127,32399.2323989
SH male rep2Scientific HatcheriesMale44,528,19599.2321562
LSB female rep1Low Stationary BehaviorFemale43,983,67499.1853227
LSB female rep2Low Stationary BehaviorFemale49,943,58499.2696399
LSB male rep1Low Stationary BehaviorMale57,927,97999.2060158
LSB male rep2Low Stationary BehaviorMale53,242,35099.2381685
HSB female rep1High Stationary BehaviorFemale55,298,35399.2311091
HSB female rep2High Stationary BehaviorFemale34,150,83599.2296909
HSB male rep1High Stationary BehaviorMale60,575,80999.2129366
HSB male rep2High Stationary BehaviorMale44,987,34399.2242418

Validation and replication with quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR

We performed both technical validation of RNA-sequencing libraries and independent biological replication (HSB and LSB strains) through quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qPCR). We quantified the reads for each protein-coding gene by using the “union” mode in HTSeq [7] in all of our RNA-sequencing libraries. Read counts were then normalized to the library size in edgeR [8]. We selected eight genes (msmo1, oxt, gabbr1a, comta, sell, prodha, hsd11b2, gapdh) for technical validation and 14 genes (msmo1, oxt, gabbr1a, comta, sell, prodha, hsd11b2, gapdh, cyp19a1b, dio2, pmchl, cfos, gabbr1b, igf1) for independent biological replication (see [1], [2] for detailed primer characteristics and qPCR reaction parameters). After normalizing each gene's expression to ef1a, an endogenous reference gene [9], we confirmed a significant correlation between gene expression measured by RNA-sequencing and qPCR. Using the same material from cDNA libraries that were submitted for RNA-sequencing, we found a significant correlation between normalized read count (RNA-sequencing quantification) and cycle threshold (qPCR quantification) for the eight genes examined (technical validation; n = 64, Spearman's ρ = − 0.278 p = 0.026; Fig. 2). Using independent samples (n = 9 for each sex in each of the LSB and HSB strains), we similarly observed a significant correlation between expression measurements from the two techniques (RNA-sequencing and qPCR) for 14 genes (independent biological replication; n = 56, Spearman's ρ = − 0.406 p = 0.002). Of note, we also observed consistent patterns of differential gene expression between sexes and stress coping styles (see [1], [2] for details).
Fig. 2

Technical validation of RNA-sequencing results using qPCR. Each point represents a gene expression value for one of eight genes in each of the biological replicates in the HSB and LSB strains. Gene expression was normalized to an endogenous reference, ef1a, as measured in their respective quantification methods.

Conclusions

Zebrafish are a model system utilized in many developmental, toxicological, neuroscience, and biomedical studies [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Understanding and accounting for genomic and transcriptomic variation will provide important additional insights. Here we describe in detail the procedures and methodologies in sequencing the whole-brain transcriptome of both male and female adult zebrafish in four different strains. The high quality RNA-sequencing results, which have been both technically and biologically validated, are available through the NCBI's GEO database (GSE61108). This dataset should be of use to studies in a variety of contexts (e.g. evolution, neuroscience, genetics, bioinformatics, and biomedicine).
Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissueZebrafish brain
SexMale and female
Sequencer or array typeIllumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Data formatRaw: FASTQ files
Experimental factorsStrain (AB, Scientific Hatcheries, LSB, HSB), sex (male, female)
Experimental featuresRNA-sequencing analysis of male and female zebrafish brains in four different strains (AB, Scientific Hatcheries, LSB, HSB), 17 weeks post-fertilization
ConsentAll procedures approved by the North Carolina State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
Sample source locationExperiments were conducted at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
  14 in total

Review 1.  Headwaters of the zebrafish -- emergence of a new model vertebrate.

Authors:  David Jonah Grunwald; Judith S Eisen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Statistical design and analysis of RNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Paul L Auer; R W Doerge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Characterizing the neurotranscriptomic states in alternative stress coping styles.

Authors:  Ryan Y Wong; Melissa S Lamm; John Godwin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Limited sex-biased neural gene expression patterns across strains in Zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Ryan Y Wong; Melissa M McLeod; John Godwin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Behavioral and neurogenomic transcriptome changes in wild-derived zebrafish with fluoxetine treatment.

Authors:  Ryan Y Wong; Sarah E Oxendine; John Godwin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Mind the fish: zebrafish as a model in cognitive social neuroscience.

Authors:  Rui F Oliveira
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Characterization of housekeeping genes in zebrafish: male-female differences and effects of tissue type, developmental stage and chemical treatment.

Authors:  Amy T McCurley; Gloria V Callard
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.946

View more
  4 in total

1.  Contextual fear learning and memory differ between stress coping styles in zebrafish.

Authors:  Matthew R Baker; Ryan Y Wong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  HDL biodistribution and brain receptors in zebrafish, using HDLs as vectors for targeting endothelial cells and neural progenitors.

Authors:  Nora Cassam Sulliman; Batoul Ghaddar; Laura Gence; Jessica Patche; Sepand Rastegar; Olivier Meilhac; Nicolas Diotel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Repeatability and reliability of exploratory behavior in proactive and reactive zebrafish, Danio rerio.

Authors:  Matthew R Baker; Alexander C Goodman; Jonathan B Santo; Ryan Y Wong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Differential effects of ethanol on behavior and GABAA receptor expression in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) with alternative stress coping styles.

Authors:  Alexander C Goodman; Ryan Y Wong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.