Literature DB >> 26309692

Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair on patients over 75 years of age.

Fatih Ciftci1.   

Abstract

AIM: In this prospective study, we aimed at comparing the laparoscopic and conventional open inguinal hernia repair procedures in the population over 75 years of age.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical data of 108 patients over 75 years of age who presented with inguinal hernia and underwent surgical treatment between July 2008 and December 2012 in Safa Hospital, General Surgery Department were prospectively recorded.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients in the open procedure group (n=75) and in the laparoscopic group (n=33) was 82 and 81 years, respectively. The mean American Society of Anaesthesiologists score was 2-7 in the open group and 2-4 in the laparoscopic group (P<0.005). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to perioperative complications. There was no mortality.
CONCLUSION: Similar to the outcome of open procedure, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can safely be performed without an increase in morbidity and mortality in the advanced age population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inguinal hernia; complications; herniorrhaphy; over 75 years of age

Year:  2015        PMID: 26309692      PMCID: PMC4538087     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  17 in total

Review 1.  Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention--effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review.

Authors:  Peter Jensen; Trine Mikkelsen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients.

Authors:  Florence E Turrentine; Hongkun Wang; Virginia B Simpson; R Scott Jones
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Is laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair more effective than open repair?

Authors:  Aly O; Green A; Joy M; Wong C H; Cheng S; Malik M
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.711

4.  Long-term cost-minimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Eklund; P Carlsson; A Rosenblad; A Montgomery; L Bergkvist; C Rudberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Inguinal hernia: follow or repair?

Authors:  Bala Ramanan; Brittney J Maloley; Robert J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2014

6.  Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  C G Schmedt; S Sauerland; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A W Robbins
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention after endoscopic hernia repair.

Authors:  Cody A Koch; Gary G Grinberg; David R Farley
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Day-case inguinal hernia repair in the elderly: a surgical priority.

Authors:  M Kurzer; A Kark; S T Hussain
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Hernias: inguinal and incisional.

Authors:  Andrew Kingsnorth; Karl LeBlanc
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.