OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the correlation between CYP11B2-344C/T polymorphism and essential hypertension susceptibility. METHODS: By retrieving relevant databases and collecting domestic and international literatures about the correlation between CYP11B2-344C/T polymorphism and essential hypertension, the quality of literature were evaluated according to NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA case-control study quality rating scale (NOS). RevMan 5.0 was used to select the best genetic model, analysis the heterogeneity, calculate combined OR and the 95% CI. RESULTS: 8532 subjects were included in this study. Compared with the control group, the OR (95% CI) values of dominant model, recessive model, and additive model were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.81~1.25), 1.03 (95% CI: 0.83~1.19) and 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93-1.29). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to confirm that CYP11B2 (-344C/T) polymorphism is associated with susceptibility of essential hypertension.
OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the correlation between CYP11B2-344C/T polymorphism and essential hypertension susceptibility. METHODS: By retrieving relevant databases and collecting domestic and international literatures about the correlation between CYP11B2-344C/T polymorphism and essential hypertension, the quality of literature were evaluated according to NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA case-control study quality rating scale (NOS). RevMan 5.0 was used to select the best genetic model, analysis the heterogeneity, calculate combined OR and the 95% CI. RESULTS: 8532 subjects were included in this study. Compared with the control group, the OR (95% CI) values of dominant model, recessive model, and additive model were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.81~1.25), 1.03 (95% CI: 0.83~1.19) and 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93-1.29). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to confirm that CYP11B2 (-344C/T) polymorphism is associated with susceptibility of essential hypertension.
Authors: Anjana Munshi; Vandana Sharma; Subhash Kaul; K Rajeshwar; M Sai Babu; Gowhar Shafi; A N Anila; N Balakrishna; Suvarna Alladi; A Jyothy Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2010-07-03 Impact factor: 3.181