Literature DB >> 26308742

Does metarepresentation make human mental time travel unique?

Jonathan Redshaw1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Recent neurological evidence suggests that rats can mentally represent novel spatial trajectories and then are more likely to follow these paths in the future. Consequently, it has been proposed that human and nonhuman mental time travel capacities may differ in degree rather than kind. As of yet, however, there is no evidence for the crucial and qualitatively distinct component of metarepresentation in any nonhuman animal, not even our closest great ape relatives. Metarepresentation allows humans to represent the relationship between current reality and mere representations of reality-including those of the future. Drawing on parallels with dreaming and mind-wandering, I outline the future-oriented benefits associated with uncontextualized (non-metarepresentational) representations of past and novel events, but propose that further, immense benefits flowed from the addition of metarepresentational insight. I critique previous behavioral paradigms used to assess mental time travel in animals and suggest how future-oriented metarepresentation might possibly be demonstrated nonverbally. WIREs Cogn Sci 2014, 5:519-531. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1308 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The author has declared no conflicts of interest for this article.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26308742     DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  6 in total

1.  Preparatory responses to socially determined, mutually exclusive possibilities in chimpanzees and children.

Authors:  Thomas Suddendorf; Jessica Crimston; Jonathan Redshaw
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away: How temporal are episodic contents?

Authors:  Johannes B Mahr; Joshua D Greene; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2021-10-26

Review 3.  Deliberating trade-offs with the future.

Authors:  Adam Bulley; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-03-17

4.  Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory.

Authors:  Johannes Mahr; Gergely Csibra
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  The Phenomenology of Remembering Is an Epistemic Feeling.

Authors:  Denis Perrin; Kourken Michaelian; André Sant'Anna
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-03

6.  Young children's capacity to imagine and prepare for certain and uncertain future outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan Redshaw; Talia Leamy; Phoebe Pincus; Thomas Suddendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.