Literature DB >> 26308657

Cognitive processing, language typology, and variation.

Kaius Sinnemäki1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Linguistic typological preferences have often been linked to cognitive processing preferences but often without recourse to typologically relevant experiments on cognitive processing. This article reviews experimental work on the possible parallels between preferences in cognitive processing and language typology. I summarize the main theoretical accounts of the processing-typology connection and show that typological distributions arise diachronically from preferred paths of language change, which may be affected by the degree to which alternative structures are preferred (e.g., easier) in acquisition or usage. The surveyed experimental evidence shows that considerable support exists for many linguistic universals to reflect preferences in cognitive processing. Artificial language learning experiments emerge as a promising method for researching the processing-typology connection, as long as its limitations are taken into account. I further show that social and cultural differences in cognition may have an effect on typological distributions and that to account for this variation a multidisciplinary approach to the processing-typology connection has to be developed. Lastly, since the body of experimental research does not adequately represent the linguistic diversity of the world's languages, it remains as an urgent task for the field to better account for this diversity in future work. WIREs Cogn Sci 2014, 5:477-487. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1294 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The author has declared no conflicts of interest for this article.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Year:  2014        PMID: 26308657     DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  3 in total

1.  Language Structures May Adapt to the Sociolinguistic Environment, but It Matters What and How You Count: A Typological Study of Verbal and Nominal Complexity.

Authors:  Kaius Sinnemäki; Francesca Di Garbo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-14

2.  Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning.

Authors:  Sebastian Sauppe; Kamal K Choudhary; Nathalie Giroud; Damián E Blasi; Elisabeth Norcliffe; Shikha Bhattamishra; Mahima Gulati; Aitor Egurtzegi; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; Martin Meyer; Balthasar Bickel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  The neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: evidence from case marking.

Authors:  Balthasar Bickel; Alena Witzlack-Makarevich; Kamal K Choudhary; Matthias Schlesewsky; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.