| Literature DB >> 26308013 |
Alessandra Andrisani1, Gabriella Donà2, Elena Tibaldi3, Anna Maria Brunati4, Chiara Sabbadin5, Decio Armanini6, Gualtiero Alvisi7, Salvatore Gizzo8, Guido Ambrosini9, Eugenio Ragazzi10, Luciana Bordin11.
Abstract
Astaxanthin (Asta), a photo-protective red pigment of the carotenoid family, is known for its multiple beneficial properties. In this study, the effects of Asta on isolated human sperm were evaluated. Capacitation involves a series of transformations to let sperm acquire the correct features for potential oocyte fertilization, including the generation of a controlled amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cholesterol depletion of the sperm outer membrane, and protein tyrosine phosphorylation (Tyr-P) process in the head region. Volunteers, with normal spermiogram values, were divided in two separate groups on the basis of their ability to generate the correct content of endogenous ROS. Both patient group (PG) and control group (CG) were analysed for Tyr-phosphorylation (Tyr-P) pattern and percentages of acrosome-reacted cells (ARC) and non-viable cells (NVC), in the presence or absence of Asta. In addition, the involvement of ROS on membrane reorganization and the presence of Lyn, a Src family kinase associated with lipid rafts, were investigated. Results show that Lyn is present in the membranes of human sperm, mainly confined in midpiece in resting conditions. Following capacitation, Lyn translocated to the head concomitantly with raft relocation, thus allowing the Tyr-P of head proteins. Asta succeeded to trigger Lyn translocation in PG sperm thus bypassing the impaired ROS-related mechanism for rafts and Lyn translocation. In this study, we showed an interdependence between ROS generation and lipid rafts and Lyn relocation leading the cells to undergo the successive acrosome reaction (AR). Asta, by ameliorating PG sperm functioning, may be utilised to decrease male idiopathic infertility.Entities:
Keywords: : astaxanthin; acrosome reaction; cholera toxin subunit B (CTB); human sperm capacitation; tyrosine kinase Lyn
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26308013 PMCID: PMC4584338 DOI: 10.3390/md13095533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1ROS generation curves of sperm samples and effects of Asta, PP2, or both. Sperm from three volunteers for each experiment was collected to form a pool with a sufficient number of cells. Sperm was incubated for up to 180 min in capacitating conditions in the absence (C) or presence of Asta (2 μM), PP2 (6 μM), or both (Asta + PP2, 2 μM + 6 μM). Luminol chemiluminescence was monitored during sperm capacitation. Results are expressed as moving averages of Relative Luminescence Units (RLU)/30 s for 2 × 106 cells. Figure 1 is representative of 11 separate experiments, conducted on samples belonging to the control group (CG, panel A) or the patient group (PG, panel B). Detection was carried out in triplicate. Graphs in panel C show AUC of the RLU data in both groups. ** p < 0.01 vs. C; Student’s t test.
Sperm cells from control group (CG) or patient group (PG) at T0, or incubated for 180 min in capacitating conditions in the absence (C) or presence of Asta 2 μM, PP2 6 μM or both (Asta + PP2), were analyzed for Tyr-P pattern (Supplementary Figure S2), acrosome-reacted cells (ARC) and viability (non-viable cells, NVC) by immunofluorescence cytochemistry (see Methods). Number of cells expressed as % of total number of cells showing Tyr-P in any part of cell body or in head, were detected and reported as Tyr-P cells and Tyr-P head, respectively. Percentages of cells undergoing acrosome reaction (ARC) or NVC were also reported. Values are expressed as means ± SD. † p < 0.01; †† p < 0.001; ‡ p < 0.0001 comparison between various samples vs. C as reference; Student’s t-test for paired data. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001; *** p < 0.0001 comparison C vs. T0; Student’s t-test for paired data.
| Groups | Parameters | T0 | C | Asta | PP2 | Asta + PP2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 ± 3 | 93 ± 4 | 94 ± 5 | 30 ± 6 †† | 36 ± 7 ‡ | ||
| 10 ± 2 | 63 ± 6 *** | 67 ± 5 | 4 ± 2 ‡ | 5 ± 2 ‡ | ||
| 16 ± 5 | 59 ± 7 *** | 63 ± 6 | 5 ± 2 ‡ | 6 ± 1 ‡ | ||
| 7 ± 5 | 9 ± 3 | 5 ± 2 † | 69 ± 5 ‡ | 57 ± 7 †† | ||
| 48 ± 6 | 57 ± 5 | 64 ± 5 | 24 ± 6 ‡ | 29 ± 5 ‡ | ||
| 8 ± 2 | 19 ± 3 ** | 27 ± 3 ‡ | 2 ± 1 ‡ | 3 ± 1 †† | ||
| 10 ± 4 | 15 ± 4 ** | 31 ± 4 ‡ | 4 ± 2 †† | 4 ± 1 †† | ||
| 13 ± 4 | 19 ± 2 * | 12 ± 2 †† | 65 ± 8 ‡ | 58 ± 4 ‡ |
Figure 2Subcellular localization of Lyn (panel A) and membrane rafts (panels B and B’) and Lyn (panels C and C’) translocation in human sperm during capacitation in absence or presence of Asta. (Panel A): Western blot analysis of subcellular localization of human sperm Lyn. The presence of the Src family kinase Lyn was assessed in the non-capacitated sperm plasma membrane (M), cytosol (C), flagellum (F) or head (H), obtained as described in Methods. Aliquots from each fraction corresponding to 3 × 106 cells were loaded and analysed by SDS-PAGE (10%), transferred to nitrocellulose and immuno-revealed with anti-Lyn antibody. (Panels B, B’, C, and C’): Sperm cells from control group (CG, panels B and C) and patient group (PG, panels B’ and C’), at T0 or incubated in capacitating conditions for 180 min in absence (C) or presence of Asta (2 μM), were analysed for CTB labelling (panels B and B’) and Lyn localization (panels C and C’) by immunofluorescence cytochemistry as described in Methods. Corresponding phase-contrast images for each condition are shown. The figure is representative of 11 separate experiments conducted in triplicate.
Membrane rafts localization, Lyn localization and activity in human sperm during capacitation and effects of Asta, PP2, or both. Sperm cells from control group (CG, panel A) and patient group (PG, panel B), at T0 or incubated in capacitating conditions for 180 min in absence (C) or presence of Asta 2 μM (Asta), PP2 6 μM (PP2) or both (Asta + PP2), were analysed for cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) labelling and Lyn localization by immunofluorescence cytochemistry as described in Methods. Number of cells, expressed as % of the total amount of cells showing labelling in acrosome, sub-acrosomal region (Sub-acro), neck and tail, were detected and reported. Protein Tyrosine Kinase (PTK) activity: aliquots of total sperm lysate or Lyn-Ip from each sample were analyzed for PTK activity as described in Methods. The values were obtained as the ratio percentage of PTK activity of samples to T0 (chosen as arbitrary comparison units). The figure is representative of 11 separate experiments. Values are expressed as means ± SD. † p < 0.05; †† p < 0.01; ‡ p < 0.001 comparison between various samples vs. C as reference; Student’s t-test for paired data. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 comparison C vs. T0; Student’s t-test for paired data.
| 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 100 ± 1 | 101 ± 2 | |||
| 1 ± 1 | 4 ± 2 | |||||
| 89 ± 8 | 96 ± 4 | |||||
| 92 ± 4 | 11 ± 6 | |||||
| 91 ± 8 *** | 93 ± 6 *** | 173 ± 9 *** | 181 ± 7 *** | |||
| 91 ± 5 *** | 90 ± 8 *** | |||||
| 92 ± 4 | 77 ± 6 *** | |||||
| 78 ± 10 | 9 ± 4 | |||||
| 95 ± 3 | 91 ± 5 | 178 ± 11 | 183 ± 8 | |||
| 92 ± 2 | 93 ± 6 | |||||
| 90 ± 6 | 72 ± 7 | |||||
| 76 ± 7 | 10 ± 5 | |||||
| 31 ± 8 ‡ | 26 ± 8 ‡ | 29 ± 6 ‡ | 2 ± 1 ‡ | |||
| 37 ± 11 †† | 29 ± 3 ‡ | |||||
| 79 ± 10 † | 89 ± 7 | |||||
| 78 ± 9 | 7 ± 3 | |||||
| 52 ± 7 ‡ | 34 ± 5 ‡ | 30 ± 5 ‡ | 1 ± 1 ‡ | |||
| 54 ± 6 ‡ | 31 ± 6 ‡ | |||||
| 85 ± 9 | 79 ± 5 | |||||
| 84 ± 5 | 8 ± 4 | |||||
| 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 101 ± 1 | 102 ± 1 | |||
| 0 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | |||||
| 75 ± 9 | 95 ± 4 | |||||
| 93 ± 6 | 16 ± 5 | |||||
| 12 ± 2 *** | 15 ± 2 *** | 125 ± 7 *** | 123 ± 5 *** | |||
| 7 ± 2 *** | 6 ± 2 * | |||||
| 89 ± 10 ** | 90 ± 6 | |||||
| 93 ± 4 | 12 ± 5 | |||||
| 28 ± 7 †† | 22 ± 1 †† | 141 ± 4 †† | 139 ± 6 †† | |||
| 32 ± 9 †† | 21 ± 4 †† | |||||
| 92 ± 7 | 96 ± 3 | |||||
| 90 ± 6 | 13 ± 4 | |||||
| 9 ± 1 † | 8 ± 2 †† | 2 ± 1 ‡ | 1 ± 2 ‡ | |||
| 5 ± 2 | 1 ± 1 † | |||||
| 71 ± 9 † | 68 ± 11 †† | |||||
| 84 ± 8 † | 9 ± 4 | |||||
| 6 ± 4 † | 9 ± 1 †† | 3 ± 1 ‡ | 1 ± 1 ‡ | |||
| 7 ± 3 | 3 ± 2 | |||||
| 82 ± 8 | 73 ± 7 † | |||||
| 83 ± 6 † | 9 ± 3 | |||||
Figure 3Correlations between acrosomal CTB, acrosomal Lyn and Lyn-Ip activity (Lyn-Ip %) values vs. ARC in both groups (CG on left, PG on right). Linear regression parameters are indicated, as well as Pearson’s coefficient of correlation r (p < 0.0001 in all cases).