| Literature DB >> 26307639 |
Shin Nagai1, Kenlo Nishida Nasahara2, Tomoharu Inoue3, Taku M Saitoh4, Rikie Suzuki3.
Abstract
To accurately evaluate the responses of spatial and temporal variation of ecosystem functioning (evapotranspiration and photosynthesis) and services (regulating and cultural services) to the rapid changes caused by global warming, we depend on long-term, continuous, near-surface, and satellite remote sensing of phenology over wide areas. Here, we review such phenological studies in Japan and discuss our current knowledge, problems, and future developments. In contrast with North America and Europe, Japan has been able to evaluate plant phenology along vertical and horizontal gradients within a narrow area because of the country's high topographic relief. Phenological observation networks that support scientific studies and outreach activities have used near-surface tools such as digital cameras and spectral radiometers. Differences in phenology among ecosystems and tree species have been detected by analyzing the seasonal variation of red, green, and blue digital numbers (RGB values) extracted from phenological images, as well as spectral reflectance and vegetation indices. The relationships between seasonal variations in RGB-derived indices or spectral characteristics and the ecological and CO2 flux measurement data have been well validated. In contrast, insufficient satellite remote-sensing observations have been conducted because of the coarse spatial resolution of previous datasets, which could not detect the heterogeneous plant phenology that results from Japan's complex topography and vegetation. To improve Japanese phenological observations, multidisciplinary analysis and evaluation will be needed to link traditional phenological observations with "index trees," near-surface and satellite remote-sensing observations, "citizen science" (observations by citizens), and results published on the Internet.Entities:
Keywords: Biometeorology; Japan; Phenological observation network; Phenology; Remote sensing
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26307639 PMCID: PMC4821867 DOI: 10.1007/s00484-015-1053-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biometeorol ISSN: 0020-7128 Impact factor: 3.787
Fig. 1Spatial distribution of the first flowering date (day of year) of cherry (Prunus × yedoensis) in 2014. Data obtained nearby the 58 weather stations conducted by the Japan Meteorological Agency were published on the Internet. See Table 1 for details. DOY day of year
Summary of the first flowering date (day of year, DOY) of cherry (Prunus × yedoensis; somei-yoshino) near 58 weather stations based on data published on the Web site of the Japan Meteorological Agency
| Site name | Latitude (°N) | Longitude (°E) | Annual mean air temperature (°)a | Mean annual precipitation (mm)a | DOY | Substitute species | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Normala | ||||||
| Wakkanai | 45.4150 | 141.6783 | 6.8 | 1062.8 | 139 | 135 | 146 | 131 | 123 | 134 |
|
| Asahikawa | 43.7567 | 142.3717 | 6.8 | 1042.1 | 129 | 123 | 138 | 122 | 117 | 125 |
|
| Abashiri | 44.0167 | 144.2783 | 6.5 | 787.5 | 136 | 124 | 145 | 127 | 120 | 131 |
|
| Sapporo | 43.0600 | 141.3283 | 8.9 | 1106.6 | 127 | 122 | 133 | 119 | 112 | 123 | |
| Obihiro | 42.9217 | 143.2117 | 6.8 | 887.8 | 123 | 126 | 130 | 117 | 116 | 124 |
|
| Kushiro | 42.9850 | 144.3767 | 6.2 | 1042.9 | 138 | 138 | 143 | 132 | 126 | 137 |
|
| Muroran | 42.3117 | 140.9750 | 8.6 | 1184.9 | 126 | 130 | 136 | 119 | 118 | 126 | |
| Hakodate | 41.8167 | 140.7533 | 9.1 | 1151.9 | 122 | 123 | 128 | 118 | 111 | 120 | |
| Aomori | 40.8217 | 140.7683 | 10.4 | 1300.2 | 115 | 120 | 119 | 112 | 104 | 114 | |
| Akita | 39.7167 | 140.0983 | 11.7 | 1686.6 | 113 | 115 | 113 | 110 | 101 | 108 | |
| Morioka | 39.6983 | 141.1650 | 10.2 | 1266.2 | 110 | 115 | 113 | 103 | 99 | 111 | |
| Yamagata | 38.2550 | 140.3450 | 11.7 | 1163.2 | 108 | 114 | 105 | 104 | 100 | 105 | |
| Sendai | 38.2617 | 140.8967 | 12.4 | 1254.2 | 102 | 109 | 99 | 97 | 93 | 101 | |
| Fukushima | 37.7583 | 140.4700 | 13.0 | 1166.1 | 102 | 107 | 95 | 98 | 92 | 99 | |
| Nigata | 37.8933 | 139.0183 | 13.9 | 1821.0 | 104 | 107 | 97 | 97 | 92 | 99 | |
| Kanazawa | 36.5883 | 136.6333 | 14.6 | 2398.9 | 97 | 101 | 89 | 91 | 90 | 94 | |
| Toyama | 36.7083 | 137.2017 | 14.1 | 2300.1 | 98 | 103 | 88 | 92 | 91 | 95 | |
| Nagano | 36.6617 | 138.1917 | 11.9 | 932.7 | 105 | 109 | 96 | 101 | 94 | 103 | |
| Utsunomiya | 36.5483 | 139.8683 | 13.8 | 1493.1 | 96 | 99 | 80 | 88 | 89 | 91 | |
| Fukui | 36.0550 | 136.2217 | 14.5 | 2237.7 | 97 | 101 | 87 | 90 | 90 | 93 | |
| Maebashi | 36.4050 | 139.0600 | 14.6 | 1248.5 | 93 | 99 | 81 | 88 | 87 | 90 | |
| Kumagaya | 36.1500 | 139.3800 | 15.0 | 1286.4 | 91 | 95 | 78 | 87 | 86 | 88 | |
| Mito | 36.3800 | 140.4667 | 13.6 | 1353.8 | 96 | 97 | 80 | 88 | 89 | 92 | |
| Gifu | 35.4000 | 136.7617 | 15.8 | 1827.6 | 87 | 90 | 80 | 83 | 82 | 85 | |
| Nagoya | 35.1667 | 136.9650 | 15.8 | 1535.4 | 86 | 90 | 78 | 83 | 80 | 85 | |
| Kofu | 35.6667 | 138.5533 | 14.7 | 1135.3 | 88 | 92 | 78 | 87 | 84 | 86 | |
| Chōshi | 35.7383 | 140.8567 | 15.4 | 1660.0 | 94 | 93 | 80 | 88 | 89 | 90 | |
| Tsu | 34.7333 | 136.5183 | 15.9 | 1581.3 | 91 | 95 | 84 | 86 | 88 | 89 | |
| Shizuoka | 34.9750 | 138.4033 | 16.6 | 2325.0 | 79 | 84 | 76 | 83 | 81 | 84 | |
| Tokyo | 35.6917 | 139.7500 | 15.4 | 1528.8 | 87 | 91 | 75 | 84 | 82 | 85 | |
| Yokohama | 35.4383 | 139.6517 | 15.8 | 1688.8 | 89 | 93 | 77 | 84 | 82 | 85 | |
| Matsue | 35.4567 | 133.0650 | 14.9 | 1787.2 | 96 | 97 | 82 | 86 | 88 | 90 | |
| Tottori | 35.4867 | 134.2383 | 14.9 | 1914.0 | 92 | 94 | 79 | 86 | 87 | 90 | |
| Kyoto | 35.0133 | 135.7317 | 15.9 | 1491.3 | 87 | 94 | 81 | 86 | 86 | 87 | |
| Hikone | 35.2750 | 136.2433 | 14.7 | 1570.9 | 91 | 99 | 89 | 92 | 90 | 92 | |
| Hiroshima | 34.3983 | 132.4617 | 16.3 | 1537.6 | 91 | 93 | 81 | 84 | 83 | 86 | |
| Okayama | 34.6850 | 133.9250 | 16.2 | 1106.2 | 90 | 94 | 83 | 87 | 87 | 88 | |
| Kobe | 34.6967 | 135.2117 | 16.7 | 1216.3 | 90 | 93 | 80 | 86 | 86 | 87 | |
| Osaka | 34.6817 | 135.5183 | 16.9 | 1279.1 | 90 | 93 | 80 | 86 | 85 | 87 | |
| Wakayama | 34.2283 | 135.1633 | 16.6 | 1317.0 | 86 | 90 | 77 | 85 | 82 | 85 | |
| Nara | 34.6933 | 135.8267 | 14.9 | 1316.1 | 90 | 94 | 81 | 86 | 86 | 88 | |
| Matsuyama | 33.8433 | 132.7767 | 16.5 | 1314.9 | 84 | 90 | 76 | 83 | 86 | 84 | |
| Takamatsu | 34.3167 | 134.0533 | 16.3 | 1082.4 | 90 | 93 | 81 | 85 | 83 | 87 | |
| Kochi | 33.5667 | 133.5483 | 16.9 | 2547.6 | 81 | 81 | 74 | 77 | 81 | 81 | |
| Tokushima | 34.0667 | 134.5733 | 16.6 | 1453.9 | 90 | 92 | 83 | 88 | 87 | 87 | |
| Shimonoseki | 33.9483 | 130.9250 | 16.7 | 1684.5 | 89 | 90 | 78 | 84 | 84 | 86 | |
| Fukuoka | 33.5817 | 130.3750 | 17.0 | 1612.5 | 81 | 87 | 72 | 78 | 81 | 82 | |
| Saga | 33.2650 | 130.3050 | 16.5 | 1870.2 | 81 | 88 | 77 | 78 | 81 | 83 | |
| Oita | 33.2350 | 131.6183 | 16.4 | 1644.7 | 82 | 87 | 73 | 84 | 85 | 83 | |
| Nagasaki | 32.7333 | 129.8667 | 17.2 | 1857.7 | 82 | 86 | 75 | 79 | 81 | 83 | |
| Kumamoto | 32.8133 | 130.7067 | 16.9 | 1985.9 | 80 | 85 | 75 | 79 | 80 | 82 | |
| Kagoshima | 31.5550 | 130.5467 | 18.6 | 2265.7 | 82 | 86 | 74 | 79 | 80 | 85 | |
| Miyazaki | 31.9383 | 131.4133 | 17.4 | 2508.7 | 82 | 84 | 72 | 78 | 81 | 83 | |
| Naze | 28.3783 | 129.4950 | 21.7 | 2837.7 | 30 | 20 | 14 | 16 | 20 | 19 |
|
| Ishigaki-jima | 24.3367 | 124.1633 | 24.3 | 2106.8 | 17 | 359b | 22 | 16 | 6 | 16 |
|
| Miyako-jima | 24.7933 | 125.2783 | 23.6 | 2021.1 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 16 | 22 | 16 |
|
| Naha | 26.2067 | 127.6867 | 23.0 | 2040.9 | 7 | 22 | 362b | 15 | 15 | 18 |
|
| Minami-Daito-jima | 25.8283 | 131.2283 | 23.3 | 1591.6 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 20 |
|
The data in this table was obtained from the biometeorological and meteorological observations conducted by the Japan Meteorological Agency (http://www.data.jma.go.jp/sakura/data/sakura003_06.html and http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/menu/menureport.html; in Japanese. Accessed 12 August 2015)
aAverage from 1981 to 2010
bObserved in the preceding year
Fig. 2Summary of the locations of the sites in each phenological observation network discussed in the text. The locations of the sites were determined by using Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/. Accessed 12 August 2015), information from each network’s Web site (INIS, http://www.sizenken.biodic.go.jp. Accessed 12 August 2015; PEN, http://www.pheno-eye.org. Accessed 12 August 2015; Cyberforest, http://landscape.nenv.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cyberforest/Welcome.html. Accessed 12 August 2015), and the literature (Ueta et al. 2012). INIS Internet Nature Information System, PEN Phenological Eyes Network
Summary of Japanese studies that analyzed RGB values obtained from phenological images
| Ecosystem type | Phenological network | Scale of image target (m) | Camera direction | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deciduous broad-leaved forest | PEN, INIS | 0.5 to 1000 | Downward from towers; sideways from buildings; upward from the ground | Ide and Oguma ( |
| Deciduous coniferous forest | PEN | 20 to 200 | Downward from towers | Ide et al. ( |
| Evergreen broad-leaved forest | INIS | 1000 | Sideways from buildings | Ide and Oguma ( |
| Evergreen coniferous forest | PEN | 20 | Downward from tower; upward from the ground | Nagai et al. ( |
| Mixed forests | PEN | 20 | Sideways from building | Mizunuma et al. ( |
| Grassland | PEN | 20 | Downward from tower | Akitsu et al. ( |
| Wetland | INIS | 200 | Sideways from buildings | Ide and Oguma ( |
PEN Phenological Eyes Network (Nasahara and Nagai 2015), INIS Internet Nature Information System (http://www.sizenken.biodic.go.jp. Accessed 12 August 2015)
Fig. 3Spatial distribution of a the start and b the end of the growing season (day of year) in 2014, detected by analyzing the daily Terra and Aqua MODIS GRVI observations with 500-m spatial resolution. White shows evergreen forests or points where we could not evaluate the timing of start or end of the growing season. For details of the method, see Nagai et al. (2015b)
Fig. 4Summary of the relationship between the amount and spatial resolution of the available datasets for phenological observations. Data obtained by citizen scientists tends to be openly published on the Internet
Summary of the advantages and limitations of different types of phenological observations
| Method | Observation period | Observation points | Spatial resolution | Spatial representativeness of the data | Labor | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periodic visual inspection of index trees by experts | 1953 to the presenta | Multiple weather stations | 1 to 100 cm | Low | High | High personnel cost |
| Fixed-point observations by time-lapse digital photography | 2003 to the presentb | Multiple sites and different ecosystems | 0.5 to 200 m | Low | Low | High capital investment (e.g., tower, power supply) |
| Analysis of near-surface remotely sensed spectral reflectance and vegetation indices | 2003 to the presentb | Multiple sites and different ecosystems | 10 m | Low | Low | High observation instrument cost and capital investment (e.g., spectral radiometer, tower, power supply) |
| Analysis of satellite remotely sensed spectral reflectance and vegetation indices | 2000 to the presentc | Global scale | 500 m | High | Low | Free for end users |
| Phenological information published on the Internet | Around 2010 to the present | Multiple points | 0.5 to 1000 m | Low to high | Low | Free for end users |
This table is a revised version of Table 1 in Nagai et al. (2015a)
aBy the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)
bBy the Phenological Eyes Network (Nasahara and Nagai 2015)
cBy the MODIS spectral radiometer sensor aboard the Terra satellite