Literature DB >> 26306882

Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare.

I C de Jong1, V A Hindle1, A Butterworth2, B Engel3, P Ferrari4, H Gunnink1, T Perez Moya1, F A M Tuyttens5, C G van Reenen1.   

Abstract

Welfare Quality(®) (WQ) assessment protocols place the emphasis on animal-based measures as an indicator for animal welfare. Stakeholders, however, emphasize that a reduction in the time taken to complete the protocol is essential to improve practical applicability. We studied the potential for reduction in time to complete the WQ broiler assessment protocol and present some modifications to the protocol correcting a few errors in the original calculations. Data was used from 180 flocks assessed on-farm and 150 flocks assessed at the slaughter plant. Correlations between variables were calculated, and where correlation was moderate, meaningful and promising (in terms of time reduction), simplification was considered using one variable predicted from another variable. Correlation analysis revealed a promising correlation between severe hock burn and gait scores on-farm. Therefore, prediction of gait scores using hock burn scores was studied further as a possible simplification strategy (strategy 1). Measurements of footpad dermatitis, hock burn, cleanliness and gait score on-farm correlated moderately to highly with slaughter plant measurements of footpad dermatitis and/or hock burn, supporting substitution of on-farm measurements with slaughter plant data. A simplification analysis was performed using footpad dermatitis, hock burn, cleanliness and gait scores measured on-farm predicted from slaughter plant measurements of footpad dermatitis and hock burn (strategy 2). Simplification strategies were compared with the full assessment protocol. Close agreement was found between the full protocol and both simplification strategies although large confidence intervals were found for specificity of the simplified models. It is concluded that the proposed simplification strategies are encouraging; strategy 1 can reduce the time to complete the on-farm assessment by ~1 h (25% to 33% reduction) and strategy 2 can reduce on-farm assessment time by ~2 h (50% to 67% reduction). Both simplification strategies should, however, be validated further, and tested on farms with a wide distribution across the different welfare categories of WQ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; animal-based assessment protocols; broilers; simplification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26306882     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115001706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  12 in total

Review 1.  Technology and Poultry Welfare.

Authors:  Neila Ben Sassi; Xavier Averós; Inma Estevez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  On-farm broiler chicken welfare assessment using transect sampling reflects environmental inputs and production outcomes.

Authors:  Neila BenSassi; Judit Vas; Guro Vasdal; Xavier Averós; Inma Estévez; Ruth C Newberry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Broiler Chickens On-Farm Welfare Assessment: Estimating the Robustness of the Transect Sampling Method.

Authors:  Neila BenSassi; Xavier Averós; Inma Estevez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-08-06

4.  Slow and steady wins the race: The behaviour and welfare of commercial faster growing broiler breeds compared to a commercial slower growing breed.

Authors:  Laura M Dixon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Environmental and Management Factors Affecting the Time Budgets of Free-Ranging Iberian Pigs Reared in Spain.

Authors:  Míriam Martínez-Macipe; Eva Mainau; Xavier Manteca; Antoni Dalmau
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  The Impact of Probiotics and Egg Yolk IgY on Behavior and Blood Parameters in a Broiler Immune Stress Model.

Authors:  Ibrahim F Rehan; Mohammed Youssef; Mootaz A M Abdel-Rahman; Sohaila G Fahmy; Eslam Ahmed; Ahmed S Ahmed; Mohamed A Maky; Hassan M Diab; Obeid Shanab; Saad Alkahtani; Mohamed M Abdel-Daim; Hamdy Hassan; Ahmed F Rehan; Mohamed A Hussien; Nesreen Z Eleiwa; Asmaa Elnagar; Ahmed Abdeen; Abd El-Latif Hesham
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-04-09

7.  Effects of different floor materials on the welfare and behaviour of slow- and fast-growing broilers.

Authors:  Enver Çavuşoğlu; Metin Petek
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2019-06-14

8.  Tilapia On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Semi-intensive Production Systems.

Authors:  Ana Silvia Pedrazzani; Murilo Henrique Quintiliano; Franciele Bolfe; Elaine Cristina de Oliveira Sans; Carla Forte Maiolino Molento
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-25

9.  A pilot survey of farm animal welfare in Serbia, a country preparing for EU accession.

Authors:  Clare J Phythian; Siobhan Mullan; Andrew Butterworth; Sarah Lambton; Jelena Ilić; Jelena Burazerović; Elvir Burazerović; Katharine A Leach
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-23

10.  Quantifying defence cascade responses as indicators of pig affect and welfare using computer vision methods.

Authors:  Poppy Statham; Sion Hannuna; Samantha Jones; Neill Campbell; G Robert Colborne; William J Browne; Elizabeth S Paul; Michael Mendl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.