Literature DB >> 26306779

ArthroBroström Lateral Ankle Stabilization Technique: An Anatomic Study.

Jorge I Acevedo1, Cristian Ortiz2, Pau Golano3, Caio Nery4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic ankle lateral ligament repair techniques have recently been developed and biomechanically as well as clinically validated. Although there has been 1 anatomic study relating suture and anchor proximity to anatomic structures, none has evaluated the ArthroBroström procedure.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the proximity of anatomic structures for the ArthroBroström lateral ankle ligament stabilization technique and to define ideal landmarks and "safe zones" for this repair. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: Ten human cadaveric ankle specimens (5 matched pairs) were screened for the study. All specimens underwent arthroscopic lateral ligament repair according to the previously described ArthroBroström technique with 2 suture anchors in the fibula. Three cadaveric specimens were used to test the protocol, and 7 were dissected to determine the proximity of anatomic structures. Several distances were measured, including those of different anatomic structures to the suture knots, to determine the "safe zones." Measurements were obtained by 2 separate observers, and statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS: None of the specimens revealed entrapment by either of the suture knots of the critical anatomic structures, including the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN), sural nerve, peroneus tertius tendon, peroneus brevis tendon, or peroneus longus tendon. The internervous safe zone between the intermediate branch of the SPN and sural nerve was a mean of 51 mm (range, 39-64 mm). The intertendinous safe zone between the peroneus tertius and peroneus brevis was a mean of 43 mm (range, 37-49 mm). On average, a 20-mm (range, 8-36 mm) safe distance was maintained from the most medial suture to the intermediate branch of the SPN. The amount of inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) grasped by either suture knot varied from 0 to 12 mm, with 86% of repairs including the retinaculum.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that there is a relatively wide internervous and intertendinous safe zone when performing the ArthroBroström technique for lateral ankle stabilization. While none of the critical anatomic structures was entrapped by the suture knots, it was evident that the IER was included in a majority of the repairs. This study further defines the proximity of adjacent anatomic structures and establishes the anatomic safe zones for the ArthroBroström lateral ankle stabilization procedure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: By defining this relatively risk-free zone, surgeons who are not as experienced with arthroscopic lateral ligament repair techniques may approach arthroscopic suture passage with more confidence.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Broström repair; ankle; arthroscopic ankle lateral ligament repair; ligaments

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26306779     DOI: 10.1177/0363546515597464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of lateral ankle joint instability. Open or arthroscopic?].

Authors:  M Galla
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The arthroscopic all-inside ankle lateral collateral ligament repair is a safe and reproducible technique.

Authors:  Matteo Guelfi; Jordi Vega; Francesc Malagelada; Miki Dalmau-Pastor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Arthroscopic modified Broström operation versus open reconstruction with local periosteal flap in chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Moritz Mederake; Ulf Krister Hofmann; Ingmar Ipach
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Operative treatment of lateral ligament instability.

Authors:  Rachel J Shakked; Sydney Karnovsky; Mark C Drakos
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 5.  Nonreconstruction Options for Treating Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries of the Elbow in Overhead Athletes.

Authors:  Nicholas J Clark; Vishal S Desai; Joshua D Dines; Mark E Morrey; Christopher L Camp
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

6.  Anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair using two suture anchors produced better functional outcomes than using one suture anchor for the treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  Hong Li; Yinghui Hua; Hongyun Li; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Current concepts in the surgical management of chronic ankle lateral ligament instability.

Authors:  Shiluka Dias; Thomas L Lewis; Yousif Alkhalfan; Raju Ahluwalia; Robbie Ray
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 8.  Arthroscopic versus open repair of lateral ankle ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra J Brown; Yoshiharu Shimozono; Eoghan T Hurley; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Does arthroscopic repair show superiority over open repair of lateral ankle ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaosong Zhi; Zhuman Lv; Chen Zhang; Changwang Kong; Shijun Wei; Feng Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Anatomic Knot Suture Anchor Versus Knotless Suture Anchor Technique for Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison.

Authors:  Hong Li; Hanlin Xu; Yinghui Hua; Wenbo Chen; Hongyun Li; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.