| Literature DB >> 26306699 |
Alexander Koch1,2, Tim De Meyer3, Jana Jeschke4, Wim Van Criekinge5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, increasing amounts of genomic and clinical cancer data have become publically available through large-scale collaborative projects such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). However, as long as these datasets are difficult to access and interpret, they are essentially useless for a major part of the research community and their scientific potential will not be fully realized. To address these issues we developed MEXPRESS, a straightforward and easy-to-use web tool for the integration and visualization of the expression, DNA methylation and clinical TCGA data on a single-gene level ( http://mexpress.be ).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26306699 PMCID: PMC4549898 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1847-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Visualization of the TCGA data for GSTP1 in prostate adenocarcinoma using MEXPRESS. a In the default MEXPRESS plot, the samples are ordered by their expression value. This view shows how GSTP1 expression and promoter methylation are negatively correlated, which is confirmed by the Pearson correlation coefficients on the right. It also indicates that normal samples tend to have higher GSTP1 expression than tumor samples. b When reordered by sample type, the differences in expression and methylation between normal and tumor samples become even more apparent
Fig. 2MEXPRESS view of the TCGA data for MLPH in breast invasive carcinoma. The samples are ordered by breast cancer subtype, revealing clear differences in expression and methylation, as well as HER2, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, between the different subtypes
A comparison of different tools for the visualization of TCGA data. As illustrated by the Additional file 1: Figures S1, S2, S3 and S4, there are obvious differences between existing tools and MEXPRESS in both the data and the features these tools offer. This table lists the most relevant of these differences, thereby highlighting some of the strengths and weaknesses of each tool. (CGW Cancer Genomics Workbench, IGV Integrative Genomics Viewer)
| UCSC genome browser | cBioPortal | CGW | IGV | MEXPRESS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All TCGA cancer and data types available | yes | yes | no | no | no |
| Integration of expression, DNA methylation and clinical data | no | no | no | no | yes |
| Statistical interpretation of the relationships | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| Registration and download required | no | no | no | yes | no |
CGW Cancer Genomics Workbench, IGV Integrative Genomics Viewer