E K Calton1, K Pathak1, M J Soares2, H Alfonso3, K N Keane4, P Newsholme4, N K Cummings5, W Chan She Ping-Delfos6, A Hamidi4. 1. Nutrition, Dietetics and Food Technology, School of Public Health, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute-Metabolic Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia. 2. Nutrition, Dietetics and Food Technology, School of Public Health, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute-Metabolic Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia. m.soares@curtin.edu.au. 3. Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia. 4. School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute-Biosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia. 5. Optimal Nutrition and Exercise, St John of God Medical Clinic and Wexford Medical Centre, 100 Murdoch Drive, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia. 6. General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, 19 Mount Street, Fremantle, WA, 6959, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Resting metabolic rate (RMR) accounts for two-thirds of the total energy expenditure in sedentary individuals. After accounting for traditional factors, there still remains a considerable unexplained variance in RMR. There is a pandemic of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) which coexists with a high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effects of vitamin D status, insulin sensitivity (IS) and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) on RMR in Australian adults. METHODS: RMR, respiratory quotient (RQ), McAuley's insulin sensitivity index, fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM) and vitamin D status were assessed in Australian adults. The presence of MetS was evaluated by current standard criteria. Predictors of RMR were examined through multiple linear regression based on stepwise and backward regression approaches with attention to multi-collinearity. All analyses were conducted on SPSS version 21. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven participants (45 men, 82 women), aged 53.4 ± 11.7 years and BMI 31.9 ± 5.2 kg/m(2), were included. Forty-one subjects were insufficient in vitamin D status (<50 nmol/L), and 75 participants had the MetS. A parsimonious regression model explained 85.8 % of RMR and was given by: RMR (kJ/d) = 1931 + 83.5 × FFM (kg) + 29.5 × FM (kg) + 5.65 × 25(OH)D (nmol/L) - 17.6 × age (years) - 57.51 × IS. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D status and IS are novel independent predictors of RMR in adults. Future studies could validate a causal role for these factors in human energy metabolism.
PURPOSE: Resting metabolic rate (RMR) accounts for two-thirds of the total energy expenditure in sedentary individuals. After accounting for traditional factors, there still remains a considerable unexplained variance in RMR. There is a pandemic of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) which coexists with a high prevalence of vitamin Dinsufficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effects of vitamin D status, insulin sensitivity (IS) and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) on RMR in Australian adults. METHODS: RMR, respiratory quotient (RQ), McAuley's insulin sensitivity index, fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM) and vitamin D status were assessed in Australian adults. The presence of MetS was evaluated by current standard criteria. Predictors of RMR were examined through multiple linear regression based on stepwise and backward regression approaches with attention to multi-collinearity. All analyses were conducted on SPSS version 21. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven participants (45 men, 82 women), aged 53.4 ± 11.7 years and BMI 31.9 ± 5.2 kg/m(2), were included. Forty-one subjects were insufficient in vitamin D status (<50 nmol/L), and 75 participants had the MetS. A parsimonious regression model explained 85.8 % of RMR and was given by: RMR (kJ/d) = 1931 + 83.5 × FFM (kg) + 29.5 × FM (kg) + 5.65 × 25(OH)D (nmol/L) - 17.6 × age (years) - 57.51 × IS. CONCLUSION:Vitamin D status and IS are novel independent predictors of RMR in adults. Future studies could validate a causal role for these factors in human energy metabolism.
Entities:
Keywords:
Insulin sensitivity; Metabolic syndrome; Resting metabolic rate; Vitamin D
Authors: Kari E Wong; Frances L Szeto; Wenshuo Zhang; Honggang Ye; Juan Kong; Zhongyi Zhang; Xiao Jian Sun; Yan Chun Li Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Theresa Drabsch; Christina Holzapfel; Lynne Stecher; Julia Petzold; Thomas Skurk; Hans Hauner Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Alicja Nowak; Monika Dalz; Ewa Śliwicka; Helena Elegańczyk-Kot; Jakub Kryściak; Katarzyna Domaszewska; Maria Laurentowska; Piotr Kocur; Barbara Pospieszna Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Erika Aparecida Silveira; Camila Kellen de Souza Cardoso; Letícia de Almeida Nogueira E Moura; Ana Paula Dos Santos Rodrigues; Cesar de Oliveira Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Małgorzata Godala; Ewa Sewerynek; Dominik Maślach; Michalina Krzyżak; Ewelina Gaszyńska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 3.390