Literature DB >> 26306460

Developments in amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction programs.

Gemma Harding1, Richard A Griffiths1, Lissette Pavajeau1.   

Abstract

Captive breeding and reintroduction remain high profile but controversial conservation interventions. It is important to understand how such programs develop and respond to strategic conservation initiatives. We analyzed the contribution to conservation made by amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction since the launch of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Amphibian Conservation Action Plan (ACAP) in 2007. We assembled data on amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction from a variety of sources including the Amphibian Ark database and the IUCN Red List. We also carried out systematic searches of Web of Science, JSTOR, and Google Scholar for relevant literature. Relative to data collected from 1966 to 2006, the number of species involved in captive breeding and reintroduction projects increased by 57% in the 7 years since release of the ACAP. However, there have been relatively few new reintroductions over this period; most programs have focused on securing captive-assurance populations (i.e., species taken into captivity as a precaution against extinctions in the wild) and conservation-related research. There has been a shift to a broader representation of frogs, salamanders, and caecilians within programs and an increasing emphasis on threatened species. There has been a relative increase of species in programs from Central and South America and the Caribbean, where amphibian biodiversity is high. About half of the programs involve zoos and aquaria with a similar proportion represented in specialist facilities run by governmental or nongovernmental agencies. Despite successful reintroduction often being regarded as the ultimate milestone for such programs, the irreversibility of many current threats to amphibians may make this an impractical goal. Instead, research on captive assurance populations may be needed to develop imaginative solutions to enable amphibians to survive alongside current, emerging, and future threats.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amphibian decline; captive assurance; conservación ex situ; declinación de anfibios; ex situ conservation; frog; garantía en cautiverio; rana; reubicación; sapo; toad; translocation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26306460     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  14 in total

1.  Setting priorities in biodiversity conservation: An exercise with students, recent graduates, and environmental managers in Brazil.

Authors:  Emanuelle Cordeiro Azevedo Souza; Enrico Bernard
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Evaluation of different temporal periods between hormone-induced ovulation attempts in the female Fowler's toad Anaxyrus fowleri.

Authors:  Emmet L Guy; Michelle W Martin; Andrew J Kouba; Judith A Cole; Carrie K Kouba
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 3.  Captivity and Animal Microbiomes: Potential Roles of Microbiota for Influencing Animal Conservation.

Authors:  Jason W Dallas; Robin W Warne
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Body condition, skin bacterial communities and disease status: insights from the first release trial of the limosa harlequin frog, Atelopus limosus.

Authors:  Angie Estrada; Daniel Medina; Brian Gratwicke; Roberto Ibáñez; Lisa K Belden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Getting off to a good start? Genetic evaluation of the ex situ conservation project of the Critically Endangered Montseny brook newt (Calotriton arnoldi).

Authors:  Emilio Valbuena-Ureña; Anna Soler-Membrives; Sebastian Steinfartz; Mònica Alonso; Francesc Carbonell; Raquel Larios-Martín; Elena Obon; Salvador Carranza
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Monitoring health and reproductive status of olms (Proteus anguinus) by ultrasound.

Authors:  Susanne Holtze; Maja Lukač; Ivan Cizelj; Frank Mutschmann; Claudia Anita Szentiks; Dušan Jelić; Robert Hermes; Frank Göritz; Stanton Braude; Thomas Bernd Hildebrandt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation.

Authors:  Maciej Pabijan; Gemma Palomar; Bernardo Antunes; Weronika Antoł; Piotr Zieliński; Wiesław Babik
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Take one step backward to move forward: Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of captive Asian woolly-necked storks (Ciconia episcopus).

Authors:  Kornsuang Jangtarwan; Tassika Koomgun; Tulyawat Prasongmaneerut; Ratchaphol Thongchum; Worapong Singchat; Panupong Tawichasri; Toshiharu Fukayama; Siwapech Sillapaprayoon; Ekaphan Kraichak; Narongrit Muangmai; Sudarath Baicharoen; Chainarong Punkong; Surin Peyachoknagul; Prateep Duengkae; Kornsorn Srikulnath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Integrating Genomic Data Sets for Knowledge Discovery: An Informed Approach to Management of Captive Endangered Species.

Authors:  Kristopher J L Irizarry; Doug Bryant; Jordan Kalish; Curtis Eng; Peggy L Schmidt; Gini Barrett; Margaret C Barr
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Comparing the bacterial communities of wild and captive golden mantella frogs: Implications for amphibian conservation.

Authors:  Luiza F Passos; Gerardo Garcia; Robert J Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.