Literature DB >> 26304210

The true impact of the French pay-for-performance program on physicians' benzodiazepines prescription behavior.

Audrey Michel-Lepage1,2, Bruno Ventelou3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The French pay-for-performance (P4P) contract CAPI implemented by the national health insurance included a target-goal which aims at reducing benzodiazepines prescriptions. In this investigation, we would like to assess whether: (1) the general practitioners (GPs) having signed P4P contract obtain better results regarding the target-goal than non-signatories; (2) (part of) this progression is due to the CAPI contract itself (tentative measurement of a "causal effect"); (3) (part of) the money spent on this P4P incentive can be self-financed with the amount of pharmaceuticals saved.
METHODS: We matched cross-sectional and longitudinal data including 4622 French GPs from June 2011 to December 2012. A treatment effect model using instrumental variables was performed to take into account potential self-selection issue in signing. After having identified the NET impact of the P4P, we calculate the cost of an avoided benzodiazepines treatment.
RESULTS: In our study, GPs who have signed the CAPI contract (36 % of the sample) are more numerous in achieving benzodiazepines target goal than non-signatories: 90.7 vs. 85.5 %. After controlling for the self-selection bias, the propensity of GPs to achieve the benzodiazepines target is only 0.31 % higher for signatories than for their non-signing counterparts-estimate for June 2012, which yields a statistically significant gap. Our economic analysis demonstrates that the CAPI contract does not allow savings, but presents in 2012 a NET cost of 93.6€ per avoided benzodiazepines treatment (291€ in 2011).
CONCLUSIONS: The P4P contract has a positive but modest impact on the achievement of GPs regarding benzodiazepines indicator.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behaviors; Benzodiazepines; CAPI; General practitioners; Pay-for-performance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26304210     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-015-0717-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  9 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of diabetes pay-for-performance incentive designs.

Authors:  Hui-Min Hsieh; Shu-Ling Tsai; Shyi-Jang Shin; Lih-Wen Mau; Herng-Chia Chiu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer; Denise Remus; Sheila Roman; Michael B Rothberg; Evan M Benjamin; Allen Ma; Dale W Bratzler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Payment for performance in health care.

Authors:  Russell Mannion; Huw T O Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-09

4.  Effect of a UK pay-for-performance program on ethnic disparities in diabetes outcomes: interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  Riyadh Alshamsan; John Tayu Lee; Azeem Majeed; Gopalakrishnan Netuveli; Christopher Millett
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 5.  Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS.

Authors:  Simon Walker; Anne R Mason; Karl Claxton; Richard Cookson; Elisabeth Fenwick; Robert Fleetcroft; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Impact of a pay for performance programme on French GPs' consultation length.

Authors:  Olivier Saint-Lary; Jonathan Sicsic
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England.

Authors:  Stephen M Campbell; David Reeves; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Bonnie Sibbald; Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Is a diabetes pay-for-performance program cost-effective under the National Health Insurance in Taiwan?

Authors:  Elise Chia-Hui Tan; Raoh-Fang Pwu; Duan-Rung Chen; Ming-Chin Yang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood; Hugh Gravelle; David Reeves; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Urara Hiroeh; Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures.

Authors:  Sophie Massin; Antoine Nebout; Bruno Ventelou
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-08-31

2.  Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings.

Authors:  Liying Jia; Qingyue Meng; Anthony Scott; Beibei Yuan; Lu Zhang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-20

3.  Effect of reimbursement restriction policy on the use of benzodiazepines in the Netherlands: an interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  Lennart Jan Stoker; Eibert Roelof Heerdink; Richard Janssen; Toine C G Egberts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The implementation potential of a method to monitor empirically-supported children's mental health treatment through claims data.

Authors:  Sarah Cusworth Walker; Noah Gubner; Aniyar Iztguttinov; Felix Rodriguez; Paul Davis; Aaron Lyon; Suzanne Kerns; Eric Bruns; Jiage Qian; Georganna Sedlar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Arezou Zaresani; Anthony Scott
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.