Literature DB >> 26304190

What eye movements can tell us about sentence comprehension.

Shravan Vasishth1, Titus von der Malsburg1, Felix Engelmann1.   

Abstract

Eye movement data have proven to be very useful for investigating human sentence processing. Eyetracking research has addressed a wide range of questions, such as recovery mechanisms following garden-pathing, the timing of processes driving comprehension, the role of anticipation and expectation in parsing, the role of semantic, pragmatic, and prosodic information, and so on. However, there are some limitations regarding the inferences that can be made on the basis of eye movements. One relates to the nontrivial interaction between parsing and the eye movement control system which complicates the interpretation of eye movement data. Detailed computational models that integrate parsing with eye movement control theories have the potential to unpack the complexity of eye movement data and can therefore aid in the interpretation of eye movements. Another limitation is the difficulty of capturing spatiotemporal patterns in eye movements using the traditional word-based eyetracking measures. Recent research has demonstrated the relevance of these patterns and has shown how they can be analyzed. In this review, we focus on reading, and present examples demonstrating how eye movement data reveal what events unfold when the parser runs into difficulty, and how the parsing system interacts with eye movement control. WIREs Cogn Sci 2013, 4:125-134. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1209 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 26304190     DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  8 in total

1.  Delayed Application of Binding Condition C During Cataphoric Pronoun Resolution.

Authors:  Clare Patterson; Claudia Felser
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-04

2.  False Positives and Other Statistical Errors in Standard Analyses of Eye Movements in Reading.

Authors:  Titus von der Malsburg; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Incremental Language Comprehension Difficulty Predicts Activity in the Language Network but Not the Multiple Demand Network.

Authors:  Leila Wehbe; Idan Asher Blank; Cory Shain; Richard Futrell; Roger Levy; Titus von der Malsburg; Nathaniel Smith; Edward Gibson; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.861

4.  Retrieval Interference in Syntactic Processing: The Case of Reflexive Binding in English.

Authors:  Umesh Patil; Shravan Vasishth; Richard L Lewis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-26

5.  Prosodic Focus Marking in Silent Reading: Effects of Discourse Context and Rhythm.

Authors:  Gerrit Kentner; Shravan Vasishth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-08

6.  Role of Expectation and Working Memory Constraints in Hindi Comprehension: An Eye-tracking Corpus Analysis.

Authors:  Arpit Agrawal; Sumeet Agarwal; Samar Husain
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 0.957

7.  The effect of decay and lexical uncertainty on processing long-distance dependencies in reading.

Authors:  Kate Stone; Titus von der Malsburg; Shravan Vasishth
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  RastrOS Project: Natural Language Processing contributions to the development of an eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms for Brazilian Portuguese.

Authors:  Sidney Evaldo Leal; Katerina Lukasova; Maria Teresa Carthery-Goulart; Sandra Maria Aluísio
Journal:  Lang Resour Eval       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 1.835

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.