Literature DB >> 26303811

Pancreatic cancer patients with lymph node involvement by direct tumor extension have similar survival to those with node-negative disease.

Jennifer L Williams1, Andrew H Nguyen2, Matthew Rochefort2, V Raman Muthusamy3, Zev A Wainberg3, David W Dawson4, James S Tomlinson2, O Joe Hines2, Howard A Reber2, Timothy R Donahue2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) involvement is a well-known poor prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, there have been conflicting results on the significance of the mechanism of LN involvement, "direct" tumor invasion versus "metastatic," disease on patient survival.
METHODS: Clinicopathologic records from all patients who underwent resection for PDAC from 1990 to 2014 at a single-institution were reviewed.
RESULTS: Of the 385 total patients, there was tumor invasion outside of the pancreas in 289 (75.1%) patients. Overall, 239 (62.1%) had node-positive disease: 220 (92.0%) by "metastatic" involvement, 14 (5.9%) by "direct" tumor extension, and five (2.1%) by a mix of "metastatic" and "direct". There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic factors associated with PDAC survival between "metastatic" and "direct" LN patients. The median overall survival for the whole cohort was 31.1 months. Compared to overall survival in patients with LN-negative disease (median 40.7 months), those with LNs involved by "metastatic" spread was significantly shorter (median 25.7 months, P < 0.001), yet "direct" LN extension was similar (median 48.1 months, P = 0.719).
CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of LN involvement affects PDAC prognosis. Patients with LNs involved by direct extension have similar survival to those with node-negative disease.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TNM staging; neoplasm metastasis; pancreatic cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26303811     DOI: 10.1002/jso.24011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Pathology Model of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Krzysztof Szymoński; Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska; Ewelina Lipiec; Dariusz Adamek
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  African Americans with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma exhibit gender differences in Kaiso expression.

Authors:  Jacqueline Jones; Angana Mukherjee; Balasubramanyam Karanam; Melissa Davis; Jesse Jaynes; R Renee Reams; Windy Dean-Colomb; Clayton Yates
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Rethinking the TNM Classification Regarding Direct Lymph Node Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fiona Speichinger; Mihnea P Dragomir; Simon Schallenberg; Florian N Loch; Claudius E Degro; Ann-Kathrin Baukloh; Lisa Hartmann; Ioannis Pozios; Christian Schineis; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Johannes C Lauscher; Katharina Beyer; Carsten Kamphues
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Dilemmas for the pathologist in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens : An overview of different grossing approaches and the relevance of the histopathological characteristics in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens.

Authors:  Eline Soer; Lodewijk Brosens; Marc van de Vijver; Frederike Dijk; Marie-Louise van Velthuysen; Arantza Farina-Sarasqueta; Hans Morreau; Johan Offerhaus; Lianne Koens; Joanne Verheij
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Pathomorphological features of metastatic lymph nodes as predictors of postoperative prognosis in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mayumi Hoshikawa; Sho Ogata; Makoto Nishikawa; Akifumi Kimura; Takahiro Einama; Takuji Noro; Suefumi Aosasa; Kazuo Hase; Hironori Tsujimoto; Hideki Ueno; Junji Yamamoto
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.