| Literature DB >> 26303780 |
Satoko Soga1, Noriyasu Ota2, Akira Shimotoyodome3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our previous studies demonstrated that dietary supplementation with milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) combined with habitual exercise improved muscle strength by stimulating neuromuscular development in mice. This study aimed to demonstrate the beneficial effects of dietary MFGM supplementation plus regular exercise on muscle strength and neuromuscular function in healthy humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26303780 PMCID: PMC4547417 DOI: 10.1186/s12937-015-0073-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Characteristics of study subjects
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Age, year | 39.9 ± 1.3 |
| Body weight, kg | 69.1 ± 2.7 |
| Body fat ratio, % | 18.7 ± 1.5 |
| Whole BMM, kg | 52.8 ± 1.3 |
| Leg muscle mass, kg | 9.7 ± 0.4 |
| Thigh circumference, cm | 46.4 ± 0.9 |
BMM, body muscle mass
Body weight, body fat ratio, whole body and leg (average of left and right) muscle mass were measured using a bioimpedance body fat analyzer (BC-621, Tanita, Co., Tokyo, Japan). Thigh circumference (average of left and right) was measured 15 cm proximal to the superior pole of the patella
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 14)
Composition of MFGM and whole milk powder
| MFGM, % | Whole milk powder, % | |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 46.9 | 26.3 |
| Fat | 35.7 | 25.2 |
| Carbohydrate | 10.6 | 39.5 |
| Phospholipids | 16.6 | 0.286 |
| Phosphatidylcholine | 4.71 | 0.067 |
| Phosphatidylethanolamine | 5.20 | 0.063 |
| Phosphatidylinositol | 1.32 | 0.037 |
| Phosphatidylserine | 1.74 | 0.033 |
| Sphingomyelin | 3.62 | 0.057 |
| Ash | 3.8 | 5.7 |
| Moisture | 3.0 | 3.3 |
MFGM Milk fat globule membrane
Changes in anthropometric variables before and after the intervention
| Baseline | 4 weeks | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | MFGM | Placebo | MFGM | |
| Body weight, kg | 69.0 ± 2.7 | 69.5 ± 2.8 | 69.0 ± 2.7 | 69.5 ± 2.7 |
| Body fat ratio, % | 18.6 ± 1.6 | 17.7 ± 1.5 | 18.4 ± 1.6 | 18.3 ± 1.6 |
| Whole BMM, kg | 52.8 ± 1.2 | 53.8 ± 1.4 | 52.9 ± 1.2 | 53.3 ± 1.2 |
| Leg muscle mass, kg | 9.7 ± 0.36 | 9.9 ± 0.38 | 10.0 ± 0.34 | 10.0 ± 0.36 |
| Thigh circumference, cm | 45.8 ± 0.9 | 46.2 ± 0.9 | 45.8 ± 0.8 | 45.9 ± 0.9 |
MFGM Milk fat globule membrane, BMM Body muscle mass
Body weight, body fat ratio, whole body and leg (average of left and right) muscle mass were measured using a bioimpedance body fat analyzer (BC-621, Tanita, Co., Tokyo, Japan). Thigh circumference (average of left and right) was measured 15 cm proximal to the superior pole of the patella
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 14). There were no significant differences between the groups and the changes within each group from baseline
Values of serum and blood components before and after the intervention
| Placebo | MFGM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum components | ||||
| AST, IU/L | Baseline | 17.7 ± 1.5 | 17.1 ± 0.6 | |
| 4 weeks | 17.6 ± 0.8 | 16.6 ± 0.6 | ||
| ALT, IU/L | Baseline | 14.3 ± 1.8 | 12.9 ± 1.3 | |
| 4 weeks | 12.4 ± 1.1 | 11.9 ± 1.0 | ||
| Glucose, mg/dL | Baseline | 96.6 ± 2.1 | 95.5 ± 3.1 | |
| 4 weeks | 94.3 ± 2.0 | 97.7 ± 2.5 | ||
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | Baseline | 99.4 ± 9.8 | 95.3 ± 10.5 | |
| 4 weeks | 92.5 ± 11.1 | 95.8 ± 9.2 | ||
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | Baseline | 187.9 ± 7.6 | 179.9 ± 7.7 | |
| 4 weeks | 177.7 ± 6.6 | 177.3 ± 7.4 | ||
| Blood components | ||||
| WBCs, 102/μL | Baseline | 49.6 ± 4.1 | 46.7 ± 3.5 | |
| 4 weeks | 41.9 ± 3.2 | 46.4 ± 2.9 | ||
| RBCs, 104/μL | Baseline | 503.1 ± 8.3 | 508.4 ± 8.9 | |
| 4 weeks | 494.0 ± 11.6 | 520.9 ± 11.1 | ||
| Hemoglobin, mg/dL | Baseline | 15.1 ± 0.2 | 15.3 ± 0.2 | |
| 4 weeks | 14.8 ± 0.2 | 16.0 ± 0.3 | ||
MFGM Milk fat globule membrane, AST Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT Alanine aminotransferase, WBCs White blood cells, RBCs Red blood cells
Blood was collected from an intermediate vein of the forearm after an overnight fast. The serum samples were analyzed at SRL Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). The numbers of WBCs and RBCs, as well as the hemoglobin concentrations were measured with an automatic hemocytometer (Celltac MEK-5258, Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan)
Values are mean ± SEM of 14 subjects. Differences in study endpoints between interventions were analyzed by using a linear mixed model, with group, period, period baseline, and the interaction of group and period as fixed effects; and subject as a random effect. When the model showed a significant intervention effect, pairwise comparison between interventions was performed via Bonferroni analysis. Changes were considered significant if P < 0.05
Values of leg extension strength before and after the intervention
| Placebo | MFGM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leg extension strength, Nm | Baseline | 177.6 ± 7.3 | 175.8 ± 8.0 | |
| 4 weeks | 175.7 ± 7.3 | 182.2 ± 7.0 | ||
| Change from baseline to 4 weeks, % | ||||
| 4 weeks | −0.95 ± 1.2 | 4.23 ± 1.3 | ||
MFGM Milk fat globule membrane
The leg extension strength was measured using StrengthErgo 240 (Mitsubishi Electric Co., Tokyo, Japan)
Values are means ± SEM of 14 subjects. Differences in study endpoints between interventions were analyzed by using a linear mixed model, with group, period, period baseline, and the interaction of group and period as fixed effects; and subject as a random effect. When the model showed a significant intervention effect, pairwise comparison between interventions was performed via Bonferroni analysis. Changes were considered significant if P < 0.05
Electromyogram results before and after the intervention
| Placebo | MFGM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMS, mV | Baseline | 0.319 ± 0.035 | 0.278 ± 0.032 | |
| 4 weeks | 0.293 ± 0.044 | 0.308 ± 0.034 | ||
| Change from baseline to 4 weeks, % | ||||
| 4 weeks | −8.92 ± 7.28 | 12.52 ± 5.80 | ||
MFGM Milk fat globule membrane, RMS Root mean square
The surface EMG signals of the right vastus medialis were detected during leg extension strength measurement with the Ambu® Blue Sensor M (Ambu Ltd., Ballerup, Denmark). The EMG signal was measured using a Bio-monitor ME6000 (Mega Electronics Ltd., Kuopio, Finland). After the A/D conversion, the root mean square (RMS) amplitude was calculated using MegaWin 3.0 software (Mega Electronics Ltd., Kuopio, Finland)
Values are means ± SEM of 12 subjects. Differences in study endpoints between interventions were analyzed by using a linear mixed model, with group, period, period baseline, and the interaction of group and period as fixed effects; and subject as a random effect. When the model showed a significant intervention effect, pairwise comparison between interventions was performed via Bonferroni analysis. Changes were considered significant if P < 0.05