| Literature DB >> 2630362 |
Abstract
Patients receiving antimalarial therapy, specifically hydroxychloroquine, for different periods were evaluated using contrast sensitivity test (CST) and results were compared with those of electro-retinography (EOG), and pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP), and a matching age control group. The results indicated CST to be most sensitive of the evaluated techniques particularly in patients under 40 years old. In 44.4% of the cases CST revealed macular dysfunction of which the other two methods of examination were not capable. Our findings suggest the CST is a reliable and practical method which could be used as an additional screening test for chloroquine maculopathy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1989 PMID: 2630362 DOI: 10.1038/eye.1989.121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eye (Lond) ISSN: 0950-222X Impact factor: 3.775