Literature DB >> 26303112

Psychometrics and its discontents: an historical perspective on the discourse of the measurement tradition.

Jordan Richard Schoenherr1,2, Stanley J Hamstra3.   

Abstract

Psychometrics has recently undergone extensive criticism within the medical education literature. The use of quantitative measurement using psychometric instruments such as response scales is thought to emphasize a narrow range of relevant learner skills and competencies. Recent reviews and commentaries suggest that a paradigm shift might be presently underway. We argue for caution, in that the psychometrics approach and the quantitative account of competencies that it reflects is based on a rich discussion regarding measurement and scaling that led to the establishment of this paradigm. Rather than reflecting a homogeneous discipline focused on core competencies devoid of consideration of context, the psychometric community has a history of discourse and debate within the field, with an acknowledgement that the techniques and instruments developed within psychometrics are heuristics that must be used pragmatically.

Keywords:  History; Measurement and scaling; Medical education; Psychometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26303112     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9623-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  4 in total

1.  Proceed With Caution: Implementing Competency-Based Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  M Douglas Jones; Tai M Lockspeiser
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-06

2.  The association of goal-striving stress with sleep duration and sleep quality among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Loretta R Cain-Shields; Dayna A Johnson; LáShauntá Glover; Mario Sims
Journal:  Sleep Health       Date:  2019-11-14

3.  Stakeholder perspectives on workplace-based performance assessment: towards a better understanding of assessor behaviour.

Authors:  Laury P J W M de Jonge; Angelique A Timmerman; Marjan J B Govaerts; Jean W M Muris; Arno M M Muijtjens; Anneke W M Kramer; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  Scientific integrity in research methods.

Authors:  Jordan R Schoenherr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.