Literature DB >> 26302817

30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.

Kara K Hoppe, Melissa A Schiff, Suzanne E Peterson, Michael G Gravett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of an 80 mL double-balloon catheter versus a 30 mL single-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.
METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial of women ≥18 years with a singleton, vertex pregnancy, a reactive non-stress test, and a Bishop score ≤5 comparing an 80 mL double- versus a 30 mL single-balloon catheters for cervical ripening. Women were randomly assigned to the two catheter types, stratified 1:1 by nulliparity or multiparity. The primary outcome was achieving a Bishop score ≥6 at the time of catheter expulsion or removal assessed by chi-squared, stratified by parity.
RESULTS: A total of 98 women were included in the analysis (50 in the 80 mL double and 48 in the 30 mL single-balloon catheter groups). Among nulliparous women, a greater proportion of those randomized to the 80 mL double achieved a Bishop score ≥6 at time of catheter removal (88.0% versus 28.0%; p ≤ 0.001) and delivered vaginally (60.0% versus 32.0%; p = 0.047) compared to those with the 30 mL single-balloon catheter. We found no difference by catheter type in achieving a Bishop score ≥6 or vaginal delivery among multiparous women.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the 80 mL double-balloon catheter is more effective than the 30 mL single-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening and achieving a vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26302817     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1067297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  4 in total

1.  Single versus Double-Balloon Transcervical Catheter for Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Samantha X de Los Reyes; Jeanne S Sheffield; Ahizechukwu C Eke
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 2.  Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiyao Liu; Yu Wang; Fan Zhang; Xiaoni Zhong; Rong Ou; Xin Luo; Hongbo Qi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Guang Song; Jing Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 4.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.