Philip Pratt1, Alexander Jaeger2, Archie Hughes-Hallett3, Erik Mayer3, Justin Vale3, Ara Darzi4,3, Terry Peters5, Guang-Zhong Yang4. 1. Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College, London, UK. p.pratt@imperial.ac.uk. 2. Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University College, Cork, Ireland. 3. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK. 4. Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College, London, UK. 5. Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In order to assist in the identification of renal vasculature and tumour boundaries in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, robust ultrasound probe calibration and tracking methods are introduced. Contemporaneous image guidance during these crucial stages of the procedure should ultimately lead to improved safety and quality of outcome for the patient, through reduced positive margin rates, segmental clamping, shorter ischaemic times and nephron-sparing resection. METHODS: Small KeyDot markers with circular dot patterns are attached to a miniature pickup ultrasound probe. Generic probe calibration is superseded by a more robust scheme based on a sequence of physical transducer measurements. Motion prediction combined with a reduced region-of-interest in the endoscopic video feed facilitates real-time tracking and registration performance at full HD resolutions. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis confirms that circular dot patterns result in an improved translational and rotational working envelope, in comparison with the previous chessboard pattern implementation. Furthermore, increased robustness is observed with respect to prevailing illumination levels and out-of-focus images due to relatively small endoscopic depths of field. CONCLUSION: Circular dot patterns should be employed in this context as they result in improved performance and robustness. This facilitates clinical usage and interpretation of the combined video and ultrasound overlay. The efficacy of the overall system is demonstrated in the first human clinical case.
PURPOSE: In order to assist in the identification of renal vasculature and tumour boundaries in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, robust ultrasound probe calibration and tracking methods are introduced. Contemporaneous image guidance during these crucial stages of the procedure should ultimately lead to improved safety and quality of outcome for the patient, through reduced positive margin rates, segmental clamping, shorter ischaemic times and nephron-sparing resection. METHODS: Small KeyDot markers with circular dot patterns are attached to a miniature pickup ultrasound probe. Generic probe calibration is superseded by a more robust scheme based on a sequence of physical transducer measurements. Motion prediction combined with a reduced region-of-interest in the endoscopic video feed facilitates real-time tracking and registration performance at full HD resolutions. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis confirms that circular dot patterns result in an improved translational and rotational working envelope, in comparison with the previous chessboard pattern implementation. Furthermore, increased robustness is observed with respect to prevailing illumination levels and out-of-focus images due to relatively small endoscopic depths of field. CONCLUSION: Circular dot patterns should be employed in this context as they result in improved performance and robustness. This facilitates clinical usage and interpretation of the combined video and ultrasound overlay. The efficacy of the overall system is demonstrated in the first human clinical case.
Authors: Maryellen R M Sun; Andrew A Wagner; Ignacio F San Francisco; Alexander Brook; Louis Kavoussi; Paul Russo; Graeme Steele; Rosalia Viterbo; Ivan Pedrosa Journal: Ultrasound Q Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.657
Authors: Michael C Yip; Troy K Adebar; Robert N Rohling; Septimiu E Salcudean; Christopher Y Nguan Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2010
Authors: Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph Piven; Heather Cody Hazlett; Rachel Gimpel Smith; Sean Ho; James C Gee; Guido Gerig Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Archie Hughes-Hallett; Erik K Mayer; Hani J Marcus; Thomas P Cundy; Philip J Pratt; Ara W Darzi; Justin A Vale Journal: Urology Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Xinyang Liu; William Plishker; Timothy D Kane; David A Geller; Lung W Lau; Jun Tashiro; Karun Sharma; Raj Shekhar Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Philip Edgcumbe; Rohit Singla; Philip Pratt; Caitlin Schneider; Christopher Nguan; Robert Rohling Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-02-14