PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To compare the differences in mammogram completion rates over time between Chinese American women with and without a history of mammogram screening . DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled intervention study. SETTING: Metropolitan areas of Portland, Oregon. SAMPLE: 300 foreign-born Chinese immigrant women aged 40 years or older. Of these, 83 women (28%) had never had a mammogram. METHODS:Participants who had not been screened with a mammogram within the past 12 months were randomized into either an education group or a control (brochure) group. All participants completed a baseline survey, which was administered again at 3, 6, and 12 months . MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Mammography history, breast cancer knowledge, perceived risks, susceptibility, benefits, and common and cultural barriers . FINDINGS:Women who had never been screened were less likely to have insurance, a regular healthcare provider, or to have been instructed to have a mammogram. Postintervention in the education group, mammogram completion was not significantly different between those with or without a history of screening (p = 0.52). In the control brochure group, significantly more women with a history of screening had a mammogram (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners must be aware of differential effects of education on mammography cancer screening based on women's history of screening . IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Print material may not be as effective with women who have never been screened with a mammogram. Targeted approaches based on such understanding has the potential to decrease the breast cancer screening disparity among Chinese immigrant women .
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To compare the differences in mammogram completion rates over time between Chinese American women with and without a history of mammogram screening . DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled intervention study. SETTING: Metropolitan areas of Portland, Oregon. SAMPLE: 300 foreign-born Chinese immigrant women aged 40 years or older. Of these, 83 women (28%) had never had a mammogram. METHODS:Participants who had not been screened with a mammogram within the past 12 months were randomized into either an education group or a control (brochure) group. All participants completed a baseline survey, which was administered again at 3, 6, and 12 months . MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Mammography history, breast cancer knowledge, perceived risks, susceptibility, benefits, and common and cultural barriers . FINDINGS:Women who had never been screened were less likely to have insurance, a regular healthcare provider, or to have been instructed to have a mammogram. Postintervention in the education group, mammogram completion was not significantly different between those with or without a history of screening (p = 0.52). In the control brochure group, significantly more women with a history of screening had a mammogram (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners must be aware of differential effects of education on mammography cancer screening based on women's history of screening . IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Print material may not be as effective with women who have never been screened with a mammogram. Targeted approaches based on such understanding has the potential to decrease the breast cancer screening disparity among Chinese immigrant women .
Entities:
Keywords:
Chinese immigrant women; breast cancer screening; cancer screening education; mammography screening
Authors: David Chelmow; Mark D Pearlman; Amy Young; Laura Bozzuto; Sandra Dayaratna; Myrlene Jeudy; Mallory E Kremer; Dana Marie Scott; Julia Sage O'Hara Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 7.623