| Literature DB >> 26301826 |
Mamadou Lamine Fall1, David Mathieu Tremblay2, Mélanie Gobeil-Richard3, Julie Couillard4, Hélène Rocheleau5, Hervé Van der Heyden3, Camile André Lévesque5, Carole Beaulieu6, Odile Carisse2.
Abstract
The presence and abundance of pathogen inoculum is with host resistance and environmental conditions a key factor in epidemic development. Therefore, several spore-sampling devices have been proposed to monitor pathogen inoculum above fields. However, to make spore sampling more reliable as a management tool and to facilitate its adoption, information on infection efficiency and molecular tools for estimating airborne sporangia concentration are needed. Experiments were thus undertaken in a growth chamber to study the infection efficiency of four clonal lineages of P. infestans (US-8, US-11, US-23, and US-24) by measuring the airborne sporangia concentration and resulting disease intensity. The relationship between the airborne sporangia concentration and the number of lesions per leaf was exponential. For the same concentration, the sporangia of US-23 caused significantly more lesions than the sporangia of the other clonal lineages did. Under optimal conditions, an airborne sporangia concentration of 10 sporangia m-3 for US-23 was sufficient to cause one lesion per leaf, whereas for the other clonal lineages, it took 15 to 25 sporangia m-3 to reach the same disease intensity. However, in terms of diseased leaf area, there was no difference between clonal lineages US-8, US-23 and US-24. Also, a sensitive quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) tool was developed to quantify P. infestans airborne sporangia with detection sensitivity of one sporangium. The specificity of the qPCR assay was rigorously tested for airborne inoculum and was either similar to, or an improvement on, other published PCR assays. This assay allows rapid and reliable detection and quantification of P. infestans airborne sporangia and thereby, facilitates the implementation of spores-sampling network.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26301826 PMCID: PMC4547748 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primer and probe names and sequences for qPCR reactions.
| Primer/probe/sequence name | 5′-3′ sequence |
|---|---|
|
| TGG ACT GGT GAA CCA TGG CTC TT |
|
| TTG CGA AGT AGA GTG GCG GCT TCG GCT GC |
|
| CAA CAT TTC CCA AAT GGA TCG ACC CT |
|
| AACTAGATAGCAACTTTC |
|
| GTTTTCAGGTACTCTTTA |
|
| AGGCTAGCTAGGACCGATCAATAGG |
|
| CCTATGCGTTCCGAGGTGACGACCTTGCC |
|
| AGTGCTTCGTTACGAAAGTGACCTTA |
a Zen double-quenched fluorescent-labelled probe 5′-6-Fam, 3′-IBHQ1.
b Zen double-quenched fluorescent-labelled probe 5′-HEX, 3′-IBHQ1.
Isolates/DNA of species used in this investigation and evaluation of species specificity of the TaqMan assay.
Fluorescence is indicated as detected (+) or undetected (−) for Phytophthora species.
| Isolate/DNA | Species | Host | Origin | PCR reaction | Provided by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Prince Edward Island, Canada | + | 1 |
|
|
|
| Prince Edward Island, Canada | + | 1 |
|
|
|
| Prince Edward Island, Canada | + | 1 |
|
|
|
| Prince Edward Island, Canada | + | 1 |
|
|
|
| Ithaca, New York, USA | + | 2 |
|
|
|
| Ithaca, New York, USA | 2 | |
|
|
|
| New Brunswick, Canada | + | 3 |
|
|
|
| New Brunswick, Canada | + | 3 |
|
|
|
| Manitoba, Canada | + | 4 |
|
|
|
| Manitoba, Canada | + | 4 |
|
|
| N/A | Ithaca, New York, USA | − | 2 |
|
|
| N/A | Ithaca, New York, USA | − | 2 |
|
|
|
| Ecuador | + | 5 |
|
|
|
| Mexico | + | 5 |
|
|
|
| Maryland, USA | + | 5 |
|
|
|
| Maryland, USA | + | 5 |
|
|
|
| Hungary | − | 5 |
|
|
| N/A | Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
| N/A | N/A | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| N/A | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Ohio, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| England | − | 5 |
|
|
| N/A | Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| California, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
| Rubus occidentalis | California, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Netherlands | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Mississippi, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Canada | − | 5 |
|
|
| N/A | Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| New York, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| New York, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
| Myrtus nivellei | Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| California, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Ohio, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| Netherlands | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| India | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
| N/A | Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Minnesota, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| California, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
| Maryland, USA | N/A | 5 | |
|
|
|
| West Virginia, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Oregon, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| California, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| North Carolina, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| British Columbia, Canada | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| Maryland, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Mississippi, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| Massachusetts, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Balearic Islands, Spain | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Oregon, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| West Germany | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| California, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| California, USA | N/A | 5 |
|
|
|
| California, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
|
| Hawaii, USA | − | 5 |
|
|
| N/A | N/A | N/A | 6 |
|
|
| N/A | N/A | − | 6 |
1 Dr. Bud Platt Agriculture and Agri-Food, Prince Edward Island, Canada
2 Dr. Bill Fry, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYC, USA
4 Dr. Fouad Daayf, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
5 Dr. Michael Coffey, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
6 Dr. Schmale, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
Fig 1The number of lesions per leaf as a function of airborne sporangia concentration for four Phytophthora infestans clonal lineages.
A two-parameter exponential rise to a maximum was fitted to the data. The clonal lineages tested in the study were US-8, US-11, US-23, and US-24.
Factorial analysis of variance of the number of lesions per leaf among clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans in response to the airborne sporangia concentration in the growth chamber.
| Source | Degrees of freedom | Mean square |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3 | 0.502 | 0.001 ** |
|
| 2 | 13.195 | < 2e-16 *** |
|
| 6 | 0.420 | 0.00042 *** |
Signif. codes: **, and *** represent P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively.
Results of multiple comparisons of the number of lesions per leaf among clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans.
| ASC | Clonal lineage | Mean difference |
| 95% confidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||
|
| US-8 | US-11 | −0.0033 | 1.00 | 0.6013 | 0.5947 |
| US-23 | −0.0119 | 1.00 | −0.5613 | 0.5375 | ||
| US-24 | 0.0166 | 1.00 | 0.5328 | 0.5661 | ||
| US-11 | US-23 | 0.0085 | 1.00 | −0.5697 | 0.5868 | |
| US-24 | −0.0200 | 1.00 | −0.5983 | 0.5583 | ||
| US-23 | US-24 | 0.0285 | 1.00 | −0.5564 | 0.4993 | |
|
| US-8 | US-11 | 0.0500 | 1.00 | −0.8515 | 0.9515 |
| US-23 | 0.2000 | 0.99 | −0.5543 | 0.9543 | ||
| US-24 | 0.3000 | 0.99 | −0.6015 | 1.2015 | ||
| US-11 | US-23 | −0.1500 | 1.00 | −1.0053 | 0.7053 | |
| US-24 | −0.2500 | 0.99 | −1.2376 | 0.7376 | ||
| US-23 | US-24 | −0.1000 | 1.00 | −0.9553 | 0.7553 | |
|
| US-8 | US-11 | 0.5410 | 0.02* | 0.0299 | 1.0522 |
| US-23 | −0.4875 | 0.01* | −1.0505 | 0.0755 | ||
| US-24 | 0.5375 | 0.12 | −0.0673 | 1.1423 | ||
| US-11 | US-23 | 1.0285 | <0.00*** | 0.4502 | 1.6068 | |
| US-24 | 0.0035 | 1.00 | −0.6154 | 0.6226 | ||
| US-23 | US-24 | −1.0250 | <0.00*** | −1.6875 | −0.3624 | |
Significance codes: *, and *** represent P < 0.05, and P < 0.001, respectively.
Note: The mean differences and 95% confidence levels were calculated using the Tukey HSD (honest significant difference) function. Pairwise t-test was used to calculate the adjusted P-values (Padj) (α = 0.05).
Airborne sporangia concentration level: ASC ≤ 5 sporangia m-3 is considered to be low, 5 < ASC ≤ 10 sporangia m-3 is considered to be medium, and ASC >10 sporangia m-3 is considered to be high
Fig 2Relationship between the percentage of leaf area diseased and Phytophthora infestans airborne sporangia concentration.
A linear function was fitted to the data. The clonal lineages tested in the study were US-8, US-11, US-23, and US-24.
Fig 3Relationship between the quantification cycle (Cq) value and the log concentration of Phytophthora infestans sporangia and between the Cq value and the log concentration of internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) copies.
Fig 4Relationship between estimates of the number of Phytophthora infestans sporangia deposited on silicon-greased rotating-arm sampler rods based on the P. infestans real-time qPCR assay and estimates based on microscope counts.