| Literature DB >> 26301783 |
R A Arriagada, E O Sills, P J Ferraro, S K Pattanayak.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26301783 PMCID: PMC4547807 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136809
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Covariate Balance.
| Variable | Sample | Mean Value PSA | Mean Value Non-PSA | Diff Mean Value | p-value | Raw eQQ Diff | Mean eCDF Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total native forest in 1992 (ha) | Unmatched | 86.13 | 37.14 | 48.99 | 0.02 | 45.82 | 0.14 |
| Matched | 51.73 | 45.89 | 5.84 | 0.50 | 8.79 | 0.05 | |
| Farm size (ha) | Unmatched | 165.11 | 71.43 | 93.68 | 0.06 | 90.05 | 0.19 |
| Matched | 81.08 | 73.78 | 7.31 | 0.64 | 18.39 | 0.10 | |
| D—Previous participation in other forest programs | Unmatched | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| Matched | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Distance to forestry office (km) | Unmatched | 29.48 | 25.08 | 4.41 | 0.05 | 4.68 | 0.08 |
| Matched | 30.64 | 28.21 | 2.43 | 0.19 | 3.82 | 0.05 | |
| Percent farm on steep slope | Unmatched | 38.40 | 25.54 | 12.86 | 0.01 | 13.01 | 0.13 |
| Matched | 37.25 | 34.01 | 3.24 | 0.28 | 4.49 | 0.05 | |
| D—Forest fenced in 1996 | Unmatched | 0.20 | 0.50 | -0.30 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.15 |
| Matched | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Hectares of forest in 1992 minus hectares of forest in 1986 | Unmatched | -11.35 | -10.08 | -1.27 | 0.85 | 11.00 | 0.16 |
| Matched | -5.46 | -6.64 | 1.18 | 0.63 | 3.50 | 0.10 | |
| Asset index in 1996 | Unmatched | -0.63 | -0.60 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.29 | 0.07 |
| Matched | -0.73 | -0.99 | 0.27 | 0.09 | 0.30 | 0.07 | |
| Simple count of assets in 1996 | Unmatched | 3.47 | 3.54 | 0.06 | 0.88 | 0.51 | 0.07 |
| Matched | 3.29 | 2.19 | 1.10 | 0.09 | 0.60 | 0.08 | |
| D—Resident on parcel in 1996 | Unmatched | 0.26 | 0.45 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| Matched | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Head of cattle on parcel in 1996 | Unmatched | 16.41 | 31.90 | 15.49 | 0.03 | 19.20 | 0.20 |
| Matched | 11.04 | 18.52 | 7.47 | 0.18 | 7.72 | 0.14 | |
| D- Hired workers in 1996 | Unmatched | 0.54 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| Matched | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
D indicates a “dummy” variable, coded as 1 = statement true for the respondent, and 0 = statement false for respondent; the mean for these variables is therefore the percentage of respondents for whom statement is true.
Steep slope indicates too steep to plant with crops.
Defined in footnote a of Table 1.
Unmatched sample includes 50 PSA participants and 152 non-participants. Matched sample includes 43 PSA participants and 43 non-participants.
Weighted means for matched controls.
Mean (for categorical covariate) or median (for continuous covariate) difference in the empirical quantile-quantile plot of treatment and control groups on the scale in which the covariate is measured (values > 0 indicate deviations between the groups in some part of the empirical distribution).
Note: The seventh and eighth columns present three measures of the differences in the covariate distributions between PSA and non-PSA farms. If matching is effective, all of these measures should move dramatically toward zero (Ho et al., 2007).