Literature DB >> 26300066

Lift vs. drag based mechanisms for vertical force production in the smallest flying insects.

S K Jones1, R Laurenza2, T L Hedrick3, B E Griffith2, L A Miller4.   

Abstract

We used computational fluid dynamics to determine whether lift- or drag-based mechanisms generate the most vertical force in the flight of the smallest insects. These insects fly at Re on the order of 4-60 where viscous effects are significant. Detailed quantitative data on the wing kinematics of the smallest insects is not available, and as a result both drag- and lift-based strategies have been suggested as the mechanisms by which these insects stay aloft. We used the immersed boundary method to solve the fully-coupled fluid-structure interaction problem of a flexible wing immersed in a two-dimensional viscous fluid to compare three idealized hovering kinematics: a drag-based stroke in the vertical plane, a lift-based stroke in the horizontal plane, and a hybrid stroke on a tilted plane. Our results suggest that at higher Re, a lift-based strategy produces more vertical force than a drag-based strategy. At the Re pertinent to small insect hovering, however, there is little difference in performance between the two strategies. A drag-based mechanism of flight could produce more vertical force than a lift-based mechanism for insects at Re<5; however, we are unaware of active fliers at this scale.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Computational fluid dynamics; Immersed boundary method; Insect flight

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26300066     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  8 in total

1.  An Immersed Interface Method for Discrete Surfaces.

Authors:  Ebrahim M Kolahdouz; Amneet Pal Singh Bhalla; Brent A Craven; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  IB2d: a Python and MATLAB implementation of the immersed boundary method.

Authors:  Nicholas A Battista; W Christopher Strickland; Laura A Miller
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.956

3.  On the Lagrangian-Eulerian Coupling in the Immersed Finite Element/Difference Method.

Authors:  Jae H Lee; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  A semi-automated finite difference mesh creation method for use with immersed boundary software IB2d and IBAMR.

Authors:  D Michael Senter; Dylan R Douglas; W Christopher Strickland; Steven G Thomas; Anne M Talkington; Laura A Miller; Nicholas A Battista
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.956

5.  Wing-kinematics measurement and aerodynamics in a small insect in hovering flight.

Authors:  Xin Cheng; Mao Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insects.

Authors:  Xin Cheng; Mao Sun
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Hybrid finite difference/finite element immersed boundary method.

Authors:  Boyce E Griffith; Xiaoyu Luo
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Vortex trapping recaptures energy in flying fruit flies.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann; Hao Wang; Thomas Engels
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.