Literature DB >> 26299787

Remote ischemic preconditioning protects the spinal cord against ischemic insult: An experimental study in a porcine model.

Henri Haapanen1, Johanna Herajärvi1, Oiva Arvola1, Tuomas Anttila1, Tuomo Starck2, Mika Kallio2, Vesa Anttila1, Hannu Tuominen3, Kai Kiviluoma4, Tatu Juvonen5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysm jeopardizes the vascularization of the spinal cord, and therefore, despite improvement in surgical techniques, still carries the risk of paraplegia. This study aimed to demonstrate the possible protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on the preservation of spinal cord function after segmental artery (SA) occlusion.
METHODS: Twenty piglets were randomized into the RIPC group (n = 10) and the control group (n = 10). The RIPC group underwent transient left hind limb ischemia before systematic left subclavian artery and SA occlusion at the level of the diaphragm. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring was performed from the hind limbs. Afterward, the thoracic and lumbar spinal cords were harvested and analyzed.
RESULTS: The elevation of the MEP amplitude after RIPC was statistically significant, whereas amplitude was consistently decreased in the control group. Additionally, the onset latency was significantly shorter after RIPC during SA occlusion. The control group reached a 50% decrease of MEP amplitude in the right hind limb sooner than did the experimental group.
CONCLUSIONS: Remote ischemic preconditioning preserves spinal cord function after left subclavian artery and SA occlusion, as indicated by the MEP amplitudes.
Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular procedures; motor-evoked potentials; remote ischemic preconditioning; spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26299787     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the protective effects of direct ischemic preconditioning and remote ischemic preconditioning in a rabbit model of transient spinal cord ischemia.

Authors:  Takehiko Fukui; Kazuyoshi Ishida; Yoichi Mizukami; Kiyotaka Shiramoto; Hidenori Harada; Atsuo Yamashita; Satoshi Yamashita; Mishiya Matsumoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Two episodes of remote ischemia preconditioning improve motor and sensory function of hind limbs after spinal cord ischemic injury.

Authors:  Salah Omar Bashir; Mohamed Darwesh Morsy; Dalia Fathy El Agamy
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Spinal Cord Neurons Isolation and Culture from Neonatal Mice.

Authors:  Mohamed Eldeiry; Katsuhiro Yamanaka; T Brett Reece; Muhammad Aftab
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Increased plasma VEGF levels following ischemic preconditioning are associated with downregulation of miRNA-762 and miR-3072-5p.

Authors:  Koji Ueno; Makoto Samura; Tamami Nakamura; Yuya Tanaka; Yuriko Takeuchi; Daichi Kawamura; Masaya Takahashi; Tohru Hosoyama; Noriyasu Morikage; Kimikazu Hamano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Absence of Adverse Neurological Outcomes in a Non-Neurologically Injured Polytrauma Patient Despite Extreme and Prolonged Treatment-Resistant Hypotension: A Case Report.

Authors:  Wataru Sakai; Kayoko Okazaki; Johji Arakawa; Satoshi Fujita; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  A A Pract       Date:  2019-11-01

6.  Somatosensory and transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring in a porcine model for experimental procedures.

Authors:  Sven Maier; Ulrich Goebel; Sonja Krause; Christoph Benk; Martin A Schick; Hartmut Buerkle; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Fabian A Kari; Jakob Wollborn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.